We performed a comparison between New Relic and Tintri Global Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."It is a software solution as a service, so I don't have to manage it on-premise."
"It has the ability to monitor random URLs not tied to the one pinger per application (though it costs extra)."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage the application flow."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use."
"Server uptime is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of New Relic are the reports and ease of use."
"The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM)."
"The service maps that it creates, the health maps that it creates, the insights that it provides, etc., are all quite useful."
"The Tintri product line as a whole has freed up a lot of resources from constant administration of legacy enterprise storage."
"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."
"It is complicated, especially in how you interpret the data that it provides. If it had a bit more canned, out-of-the-box features, especially some of the reporting features, that would be more useful."
"The price could improve."
"I think that there have been some questionable product enhancements. Over a year ago, New Relic rolled out a new navigation that really disrupted our workflow."
"Real-user monitoring would be helpful as it would help me to really understand the client-side performance of the application."
"The older view is much better than the new view that they have. We'd like to go back to that previous version. The user interface just isn't as nice as it used to be."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"There has been some problem with the agent, and it is just not working well. It is not able to record information with the application server. They have been able to fix the issue, but it took quite a long time. This is the main issue in the APM products and also in New Relic. The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive. It should be a little bit easier and cheaper. Because it is pretty difficult and expensive, many customers don't take it."
"A better Tintri would be a "cheaper" one to get things started again."
Earn 20 points
New Relic is ranked 5th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 152 reviews while Tintri Global Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. New Relic is rated 8.6, while Tintri Global Center [EOL] is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tintri Global Center [EOL] writes "Provides VM protection with scheduled snapshots and replication". New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus, whereas Tintri Global Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
