We performed a comparison between Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The case management functionality of this solution has been most valuable."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"The case management is great."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"UI needs improvement."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow. Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, OpenText Operations Orchestration, ServiceNow Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.