We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."Ability to collaborate with others in one location."
"The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"The solution is pretty easy to use for the most part."
"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."
"The collaboration, the ability for multiple users to work on a single document."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The entire product is good."
"The overall functions are good."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."
"The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it."
"Workflows could be simplified."
"I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications."
"The areas around security, such as protection, need to be included."
"I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications."
"The solution needs to have more flexibility. The classic version had more flexibility, however, the modern version has many more limitations."
"The GUI is outdated."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HCL Connections, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Drupal and SharePoint.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.