We performed a comparison between Laserfiche Rio, Oracle Content Management, and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."This is a very complete and powerful solution."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"The ability to take Excel files and make them dynamic SharePoint lists with instant reporting capabilities has been a major benefit."
"It is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."
"We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools."
"Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
Earn 20 points