We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetDiagnostics and ITRS Geneos based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."
"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."
"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."
"The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring."
"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort."
"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."
"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."
"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."
"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."
"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."
"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."
Earn 20 points
Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews. Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0, while ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with , whereas ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Datadog and Prometheus.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
