We performed a comparison between Bizagi, webMethods Integration Server, and WebRatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"Great software for managing my business. I think this is the best business process management software."
"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."
"The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"BPMN 2.0 compliance, while you model the processes, the system can detect your notation errors."
"The free online Help and E-Learning is very strong."
"It is quite a stable solution."
"The interface, design, and accessible user manuals to help get started using the solution are valuable features in Bizagi."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"It integrates well with various servers."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."
"Bizagi doesn't have integrations with other solutions, such as ERP systems. In the industry and your company, you have a lot of systems with which you need to integrate, but Bizagi doesn't have such integrations, which makes it very difficult. Its scalability can also be improved. It is good for a startup, but when you need something more complex, it is not good."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"The free version could be better. Some of the templates and all the functionalities aren't available in the free version. I've been trying to check some maps, for example, organizational maps or a model on organization hierarchy. Apparently, there seems to be no template. You have to create your own. I am not sure if there are templates, but I've not really seen any. I think that there's room for improvement."
"One thing that I don't like very much is related to integration: we have to develop some connectors... I would need a connector that connects to a REST service and that uses client ID in secret... They provide the means to develop a connector and use it, but they should implement this because REST services are among the most used protocols for web services."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"Sometimes, when your process is big with multiple lanes, the product will freeze the issue noticed on multiple laptops, not a single PC."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
