We performed a comparison between Bizagi, Genpact Cora SeQuence, and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It is quite a stable solution."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."
"The initial setup is super simple."
"Very, very stable."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn."
"Bizagi is a very useful tool because it does not require you to program. The user logic is very easy to understand even for people who are not engineers or developers."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"Operationally, I consider the solution to be quite good."
"How simple it is to create new solutions."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"The product is very stable."
"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."
"The solution was very limited."
"I would like to see simulation as a free feature again. In version 3.3 it was free, but in 4.0 it isn't."
"The tool is expensive and it should improve its pricing."
"It works slowly on the cloud, sometimes."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"We have migrated to the cloud, but there are a lot of issues while integrating with the cloud. There are a lot of things to improve with the cloud and reporting. We were previously working with on-premise solutions, and we had access to a lot of things, but with the cloud, they changed a lot of functionalities. Some of the things we know, but with some of the things, we are having difficulties."
"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."
"It is quite expensive."
"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."
"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"The market webMethods Integration Server falls under is a very crowded market, so for the product to stand out, Software AG would need to get traction in the open source community by releasing a new version or a base version and open source it, so people can create new custom components and add it to the portfolio."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
