It was a valuable firewall some years ago but then Palo Alto created the next generation firewall and Cisco needed too much time to create ASA CX. At the moment it has, basically, the same features. In my opinion the most valuable features now are the layer seven capabilities and the new FirePOWER.
Senior Network and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It has very good stability, but it took too much time to create ASA CX.
Pros and Cons
- "With ASA, you can scale to the largest deployments."
- "It was a valuable firewall some years ago but then Palo Alto created the next generation firewall and Cisco needed too much time to create ASA CX."
What is most valuable?
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the devices for over 10 years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I have never had an issue with my deployments.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
One of the best things about ASA's is that they are very stable.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Firewall
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
With ASA, you can scale to the largest deplyments. As an example, I have installed an ASA in an environment with 80.000 users.
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service:
Cisco Support is very good, you don't have problems using it.
Technical Support:10/10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have migrated customers from Cisco's competitors to ASA's.
How was the initial setup?
Once you have the knowledge it is not complex to install an ASA, but it does depend on the network of the customer.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Our customers also evaluate PaloAlto.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partners
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
FirePOWER mobile is good, but they should make the device accesible from the web.
Pros and Cons
- "It was straightforward."
- "They should make the ASA accessible via the web instead of ASDM. Also, a big improvement is needed on the transparent mode."
Valuable Features
- Firewall
- VPN
- FirePOWER mobile
Room for Improvement
They should make the ASA accessible via the web instead of ASDM. Also, a big improvement is needed on the transparent mode.
Use of Solution
I've used it for over six months.
Deployment Issues
There were some issues.
Stability Issues
There have been some issues with Java.
Scalability Issues
There were some issues.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Customer Service:
8/10.
Technical Support:8/10.
Initial Setup
It was straightforward.
Other Advice
Make sure to plan your network carefully.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Firewall
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Secure Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network System Engineer with 51-200 employees
The filter with NAT mode is valuable but the security options needs to be improved.
Pros and Cons
- "The filter with NAT mode is valuable."
- "Speed of execution and security options needs to be improved."
What is most valuable?
The filter with NAT mode is valuable.
How has it helped my organization?
Not really, as we are a subcontractor we install and configure it for other companies.
What needs improvement?
Speed of execution and security options needs to be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the devices for, more or less, one year.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues so far.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues so far.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
3.5/5.
Technical Support:3/5.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes we did, but we switched due to Ciscos ASA's ability to support big data stream in some networks.
How was the initial setup?
It's not too complex, but it depends on the customers' network architecture.
What about the implementation team?
As a vendor, we find IT experts with CCIE certifications.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I haven't, and my first experience working with ASA, was a project with the specifications already defined
What other advice do I have?
You must specify your needs and choose the right options depending on the network requirements.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Vendor.
Network, Unix and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It's easy to deploy, but the routing needs to be improved.
Pros and Cons
- "Yes we previously used Linux and we moved because Cisco is great."
- "With versions 8.4.4 and version 8.4.6, they had a lot of bugs."
What is most valuable?
- NAT
- IPSec
- ACL
How has it helped my organization?
It solved an IPSec issue we had with a customer. We have moved from Linux IPSec to Cisco.
What needs improvement?
- Routing
- It needs GRE supports
- Application visibility
- Context
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used Cisco ASA products since 2010.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No, it's very easy to deploy.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
With versions 8.4.4 and version 8.4.6, they had a lot of bugs. Also, after I moved to 8.4.5, route lookup changed to NAT divert and that kicked me.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
No service.
Technical Support:No service.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes we previously used Linux and we moved because Cisco is great.
How was the initial setup?
It was straightforward as Cisco Asia integrated it into OSPF, another router on the stack, and for NAT IPSec.
What about the implementation team?
I implemented it by myself.
What was our ROI?
It's good.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No other options were evaluated.
What other advice do I have?
It's a great product.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network and System Administrator at a pharma/biotech company with 501-1,000 employees
One of the features that should be improved is the URL filtering engine, but the stability of this product is one of the key functionalities in our deployment.
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to intercept unwanted traffic, and prevent attacks without interrupting everyday work, and the stability of this product are the key functionalities in our deployment."
- "Cisco ASA lacks some functionalities, when compared with other vendors’ products."
What is most valuable?
The ability to intercept unwanted traffic, and prevent attacks without interrupting everyday work, and the stability of this product are the key functionalities in our deployment.
How has it helped my organization?
This product, and our implementation, are not directly correlated with the core business of our company. It is designed to protect our company from outside threats and reduce impact on other network elements, such as the backend firewall, DMZ zone and VPN concentrators.
What needs improvement?
Cisco ASA lacks some functionalities, when compared with other vendors’ products. Cisco need to implement some more functionalities, like client-less VPN (HTML5), but I expect that Cisco will continue to add, and improve, features of the product. One of the features that should be improved is the URL filtering engine, as currently it has limited functionality. For full functionality, you will need an external URL filtering server, like Websense.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have used it for more than five years, and have implemented it for perimeter network protection. It is designed for basic network protection for our corporate environment.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues during the deployment, as we had good planning.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability. The device is designed for hard work 24/7. I never have a lack of resources like RAM or CPU. The only reason I need to restart the device is during a software upgrade.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In our deployment, we did not have a scalability issue.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
It is very high.
Technical Support:We did not have any technical problems with this product, so we have not had need of technical support
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We implemented ASA after a complete redesign of our network, and we believe that Cisco ASA is the right solution for our needs.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward, as there is a lot of documentation available on the Cisco site, and other sites, which makes planning and deployment pass without any problems. However, the ASA is a complex device, with a lot of features and further tuning is complex and you must have the right knowledge to do it. Configuration can be done through a Java based application called ASDM or through the CLI interface. Using ASDM is much more simple and easy, but ASDM is not compatible with the newer Java version, so before implementation you must read the compatibility notes. Also, keep in mind that when upgrading ASA software, you must also upgrade the ASDM package.
What about the implementation team?
Initial implementation was through a vendor. I would rate their experience and expertise as 9/10.
What was our ROI?
Calculating the ROI for network security or IT security is complex and dependent on many factors, like the implementation, role, expectation etc. IT security cannot be compromised, but on the other hand, we must ask how much is enough. In our case, we do not have a defined ROI for this product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of the setup was only the product price, local vendor support for the implementation, and employee training. This product is set it and forget it, so we do not have day to day costs.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate other products. One reason was that we believe that the ASA is a reliable product and fits our needs. Another reason, was the lack of local support for other solutions.
What other advice do I have?
Unfortunately, the ASA 5500 is EoS and EoL, and I hope that Cisco’s NGF 5500-X series will be a worthy successor. This does not mean that Cisco will stop software support and will continue to release new software versions with new and improved features for the ASA 5500 series.
As with any other product, the main things for a successful implementation are to decide what you want to achieve, and what your main goal is, and then, you need good planning, not only for your current needs, but you also need to keep in mind further grow and needs. Good planning is, at least, 80% of successful implementation.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It is very scalable, but they need to improve the pricing.
Pros and Cons
- "It has very advanced security features including FirePOWER threat management, which is the most valuable, but also URL filtering, FireSIGHT, and advanced malware protection."
- "The cost of this product should be reconsidered."
What is most valuable?
It has very advanced security features including FirePOWER threat management, which is the most valuable, but also URL filtering, FireSIGHT, and advanced malware protection.
What needs improvement?
The cost of this product should be reconsidered.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for almost a year.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
So far, I have found this model very smooth.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We had a slight issue with IPS, as the signature update was, sometimes, getting stuck.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I believe this product is very scalable with our current needs and requirements.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, I used a normal model of Cisco ASA and found it a very successful experience. Therefore we have it to a more advanced ASA box for improved, and more advanced, security management.
How was the initial setup?
Cisco implementations are always very straightforward.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Evaluation is mandatory in IT, and we have found this device has better features and reliability when compared to other products.
What other advice do I have?
I would suggest implementing this product ascand has advanced security features.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are platinum partners
Sr. Network Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
CLI of the firewall is valuable, but there are IOS related bugs in later versions.
Pros and Cons
- "It has increased the security and works best for VPN users."
- "Encountered IOS related bugs in later versions."
What is most valuable?
- Stateful inspection
- CLI of the firewall
How has it helped my organization?
It has increased the security and works best for VPN users.
What needs improvement?
The product has been introduced with UTM i.e. FirePower, and I would like to use it and comment on it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for three years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Encountered IOS related bugs in later versions.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
10/10.
Technical Support:It depends on the support contract that you have.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I previously used CheckPoint, and switched because of the UTM features.
How was the initial setup?
It was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
I implemented it myself.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I think evaluated other options with reference to our architecture.
What other advice do I have?
You should analyze the current setup and implement it as per the customers' requirement.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Platinum Partner
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Debugging messages are a valuable feature, but IPS needs to be added to the IOS.
Pros and Cons
- "Its a nice professional product with lots of scalability."
- "IPS, IDS, anti-virus etc. should be added to IOS instead of separate cards."
Valuable Features
- Scalability
- Debugging messages
- Context modes
Improvements to My Organization
Context modes as this means there is no need to buy additional firewall for different customers.
Room for Improvement
IPS, IDS, anti-virus etc. should be added to IOS instead of separate cards.
Use of Solution
I've used it for three years.
Deployment Issues
No issues encountered.
Stability Issues
No issues encountered.
Scalability Issues
No issues encountered.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Customer Service:
Dedicated experts are available in support contract with Cisco.
Technical Support:100% skilled engineers with knowledge are available 24/7.
Initial Setup
It is straightforward.
Implementation Team
We implemented it in-house.
Pricing, Setup Cost and Licensing
It is £2,000 to set up, and the running costs, depend on the customers' issue(s) or tickets raised.
Other Solutions Considered
- Juniper
- FortiGate
Other Advice
Its a nice professional product with lots of scalability. Easy to troubleshoot and there is tool called PACKET TRACER which simulates the packet and it will tell you whether a packet is allowed inbound or outbound for testing purposes.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Popular Comparisons
Fortinet FortiGate
Netgate pfSense
Sophos Firewall
Cisco Umbrella
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
WatchGuard Firebox
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
Cisco Meraki MX
Azure Firewall
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Cisco Secure Email
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
SonicWall TZ
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Secure Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Cisco ASA And Fortinet FortiGate?
- Cisco Firepower vs. FortiGate
- How do I convince a client that the most expensive firewall is not necessarily the best?
- What are the biggest differences between Cisco Firepower NGFW and Fortinet FortiGate?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between Cisco Firepower and Palo Alto?
- Would you recommend replacing Cisco ASA Firewall with Fortinet FortiGate FG 100F due to cost reasons?
- What are the main differences between Palo Alto and Cisco firewalls ?
- A recent reviewer wrote "Cisco firewalls can be difficult at first but once learned it's fine." Is that your experience?
- Which Cisco firewall model is the latest: ASA or NGFW?
- Which is better - Fortinet FortiGate or Cisco ASA Firewall?











