- Easy deployment
- Easy configuration
- Great reports
I can have the firewall up and running and configured in one hour.
I can have the firewall up and running and configured in one hour.
I do not seeing any areas that need improvement.
I've used it for two years.
Not at all.
Not at all just make sure you using a proper model for your environment, as you don't want to overload the firewall.
If you are overloading the firewall, you need to buy the next model as there is no upgrade path.
It's brilliant, 10/10 - you can open case online, or call them and you will be talking directly to the tech, who has access to your environment.
Technical Support:10/10.
I used Checkpoint, Cisco ASA, Palo Altos, Juniper. To configure the devices you need days, to spin up Meraki Firewall you need minutes.
It's very simple.
We did it in house, across five offices and the data center.
It saves time on spinning up new offices, and on managing the firewall.
Juniper switches.
I will never go back to any other solution. Right now our corporate network, across the five offices and the data center, is 100% Meraki, Meraki Firewalls, Meraki Switches, and Meraki APs.
We use it for UTM devices.
We have roughly 200 users, using this solution.
We prefer UTM solutions.
As far as what needs to be improved — nothing really comes to mind. It does what we need it to do.
I have been using Meraki MX for more than five years.
Both the scalability and the scalability are great with Meraki MX.
The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment takes less than one day.
If you're thinking about implementing Meraki MX, make sure to plan it properly. Planning takes time which gives you the ability to make sure it's scaled properly, without too much complexity.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine — nothing is perfect.