The solution is mainly used for personal tasks. A lot of the customers are working with Microsoft solutions. This product works well with Microsoft. That's why we provide the Microsoft Windows Server solution to a lot of our customers.
Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Scalable, easy to implement, and has a nice interface
Pros and Cons
- "We find the initial implementation process to be quick and easy."
- "The technical support needs to be improved."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The solution is very stable.
The scalability has been good.
We find the initial implementation process to be quick and easy.
The interface is good.
We've found the level of security to be fine.
What needs improvement?
The technical support needs to be improved.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for eight years. It's been a while. I've used it for almost a decade.
Buyer's Guide
Windows Server
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Windows Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so. It's not a problem.
We only have about 14 people on the solution currently.
How are customer service and support?
Microsoft technical support isn't ideal. They could improve their services. We're not 100% satisfied.
They could be faster, more knowledgeable, and more customer-friendly. They need to provide more direct answers.
How was the initial setup?
The installation process isn't too difficult. It's fairly straightforward.
The deployment is fast and only takes about three or four hours or so. It doesn't take long.
In my organization, we have eight people that can handle deployment or maintenance tasks.
What about the implementation team?
As integrators, we can set up the solution for our clients. I can handle a deployment myself. It's not overly complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Customers do need to pay a yearly licensing fee.
What other advice do I have?
I work with both the on-premises and cloud deployment models.
We're an integrator.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're pretty happy with its capabilities.
That said, in Thailand, they do not sell many Windows Servers, so it's difficult to use the product, Windows Server, a lot.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Integrator

Group DWH and BI Senior Manager at Virgin Mobile Middle East and Africa
Plenty of support, flexible, and easy to maintain
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features are the ease of access and maintaining the solution."
- "The security could improve. If you are comparing the Linux operating systems and Windows Server, Windows Server is still way behind in terms of security. Microsoft can enhance security instead of having customers rely on third-party security tools."
What is our primary use case?
We use Windows Server mainly for deploying high-end applications and databases.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are the ease of access and maintaining the solution.
What needs improvement?
The security could improve. If you are comparing the Linux operating systems and Windows Server, Windows Server is still way behind in terms of security. Microsoft can enhance security instead of having customers rely on third-party security tools.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Windows Server for approximately 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Windows Server is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable and flexible to expend.
We have approximately 25 users using this solution in my organization.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support and local support from Microsoft are good and there is a large online community that can support us. If we ever have any problems or bugs with the solution we can reach out to those supports to help us. However, we have not encountered any issues at this time.
How was the initial setup?
If it is a basic installation then it is pretty straightforward. However, if you need to do a lot of configurations you will need some technical knowledge.
What about the implementation team?
We can do the implementation ourselves, but mostly we distribute the task to consultants because they know the timeliness and the amount of work that needs to be done.
We have our IT support team of administrators and technicians that needs to manage the resources and in some cases do patch management and maintenance. For server maintenance, we need an expert that understands how to scale up or scale down the server.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a one-time purchase for the license of Windows Server.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Technically we only have two options to choose from for a solution to our use case. One is red Hat Linux and the other is Windows Server. Some of the applications that the team needs to develop only work on Windows Server. Based on the use case and the ease of access we went for Windows Server.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Windows Server
August 2025

Learn what your peers think about Windows Server. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Platform Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Easy to use, stable, and scalable
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is very easy to use and very easy to onboard."
- "It requires a lot of monthly maintenance in terms of vulnerability management, which is the downside."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for a variety of tasks including active directory servers, exchange servers, hosting applications, running insurance apps, and SQL databases. A whole gamut of things.
What is most valuable?
The SQL version of the solution is its most valuable aspect.
The solution is very easy to use and very easy to onboard.
The solution, for the most part, is stable. The stability is actually pretty good in terms of availability.
The product's performance depends on the use case.
The solution is very scalable.
The initial setup isn't overly difficult.
What needs improvement?
It requires a lot of monthly maintenance in terms of vulnerability management, which is the downside.
I would say the biggest improvement could be improvement in the vulnerability space. Every month we get critical vulnerabilities across the Windows Server fleet. If I could see the volumes come down there, that would be the biggest step forward.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 15 or more years at this point. It's been well over a decade. it's been a while.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is pretty stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
However, every release gets more stable and offers more performance with the exception of vulnerability management, which doesn't seem to improve. I would say, we haven't got that much experience with 2019, yet 2012 was a big advancement on 2008's version. 2016 advanced as well. Every newer version gets better in terms of performance and stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We tend to scale horizontally, and that'll scale up to quite a degree. We have some very large SQL Servers in particular that are scalable.
We have about 5,000 to 10,000 users on the solution currently.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is okay. If I had to rate it against any industry standards, I would rate it at a six or seven out of ten. It's not as good as other providers I work with. Right now, Microsoft needs you to prove it's a Microsoft issue before they'll work on it.
How was the initial setup?
We generate a custom build that's automated. Automating everything took quite a lot of effort, however, now that we have an automated build, implementing that for any new version probably takes, I'd say, a month, or maybe a bit more, which is not too bad. It's pretty straightforward.
We have a team of eight or nine individuals that can handle deployment and maintenance.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation by ourselves. We didn't need the assistance of any consultants or integrators.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have enterprise agreements with Microsoft.
What other advice do I have?
We are customers and end-users.
While the deployment models we use are mostly on-premises, we do sometimes use cloud deployment as well.
We use a variety of versions of the solution, including 2019, 2016, and 2012. We actually use a lot of 2012.
I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's a step up from older versions.
I'd recommend the solution to other companies. However, it depends on the use case. If you were hosting SQL or Exchange server, certainly. However, in other circumstances, if it was between this and Red Hat Linux, you might choose Red Hat Linux.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Sr. System and Storage Administrator at a government with 51-200 employees
Easy to use, simple to set up, and offers good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is easy to learn. It doesn't take much training."
- "The system needs to offer better integration capabilities."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for our different applications.
What is most valuable?
We appreciate how many different applications can be on the server at any given time.
The solution is easy to learn. It doesn't take much training.
The implementation is simple.
The graphic interface is very nice.
What needs improvement?
The technical updates need to be improved upon. How they are delivered isn't ideal.
Technical support in and of itself needs to be better. The experience we have isn't very good. It's hard to get timely answers to our questions.
The system needs to offer better integration capabilities.
The solution's availability could be better in future releases.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've subscribed to Windows for many years now. It's been at least over two, but probably longer.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. We don't have problems with reliability. It doesn't crash or freeze at all. We don't experience bugs either.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale. If a company needs to expand, they can do so.
Currently, our organization has 3,000 users.
We may not continue with Windows. We're moving towards graduating to Linux instead.
How are customer service and technical support?
I've dealt with technical support in the past and I can say that we are not satisfied with their level of service. They are slow to respond. They need to act faster to get us the help we need.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have always used some form of Windows products before we began implementing Windows Server. We originally decided to implement the server as we felt it was simple and easy to use. It also had a good graphic interface.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I wouldn't describe it as complex. It was rather simple. In terms of people getting trained on the system, it shouldn't take up too much time so a company can get up and running quickly. That said, the time it takes to deploy is directly linked to the training. However long it takes to get your team comfortable with it, that's how long it will take to deploy.
We had an IT staff of around ten people that assisted with the implementation. We also has a team that handles any maintenance as necessary.
What about the implementation team?
As the implementation process was pretty straightforward, we handled it internally ourselves. We didn't need an external consultant or integrator to help us.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We've looked into Linux. We may move over to that in the future.
What other advice do I have?
We're just a Windows customer. We don't have a business relationship with the company.
We're using the latest version of the solution.
I'd recommend the solution to other companies.
Overall, from one to ten, I'd rate this product at a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Cybersecurity and Compliance Coordinator at Plaenge
Easy to use, secure, scales well and has helpful responsive support
Pros and Cons
- "There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
- "The most valuable features of this solution are its performance, security, and that it is easy to use."
- "There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
How has it helped my organization?
Managing active directories and middle directories, including users and accounts, is of utmost importance for organizations.
This entails implementing protective measures, enabling conditional access, and ensuring data security, among other essential aspects.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of this solution are its performance, security, and that it is easy to use.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in terms of pricing.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Windows Server for 20 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Windows Server a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of Windows Server a nine out of ten.
We have plans to increase our usage in the future.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support a ten out of ten.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What was our ROI?
We have experienced a positive return on investment (ROI).
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost is relatively high.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Account Manager Individual Contributor at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Affordably priced, simple to install, and helpful technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to be used in a virtualized environment."
- "I would like to see better integration with other solutions."
What is our primary use case?
I use Windows Server for the deployment of applications for users.
This is only for the duration of the project; it is not for our personal use.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to be used in a virtualized environment.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see better integration with other solutions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Windows Server for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Windows Server is a stable product.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is fine. They were helpful.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not worked with other similar solutions.
How was the initial setup?
It's a software solution.
The initial setup is straightforward.
It takes two months to deploy.
What about the implementation team?
For deployment, we have an internal technical team of three people.
What was our ROI?
Because we are not using this solution for our needs, the ROI would be more applicable to our customers.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In terms of price, it's affordable.
There are additional fees to pay for support. This is more specifically to do with the license price.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated several products, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux, in order to find a budget for a project solution, but the project was canceled.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
Our company is a partner.
I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
Enterprise API Architect at Al-Futtaim Group
Beneficial application compatibility, highly scalable, and good support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Windows Server is the ease of use and the applications that are available."
- "Windows Server could improve by improving technology modernization."
What is our primary use case?
For the server-side deployment, we use Windows Server to run applications.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Windows Server is the ease of use and the applications that are available.
What needs improvement?
Windows Server could improve by improving technology modernization.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Windows Server for a very long time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Windows Server is an important feature.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have approximately 200 users using this solution.
How are customer service and support?
The support from Microsoft is good.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Windows Server was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation requires a full team to accomplish the task.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a license required to use Windows Server.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Solutions Development Manager at Kyocera International
Straightforward solution used to manage multiple servers for our business
Pros and Cons
- "This solution is easy to use."
- "The upgrade process for this solution could be simplified and made more straightforward."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for our exchange, database and SQL servers.
What is most valuable?
This solution is easy to use.
What needs improvement?
The upgrade process for this solution could be simplified and made more straightforward.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for 20 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward and took two to three hours.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Windows Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Product Categories
Operating Systems (OS) for BusinessPopular Comparisons
Ubuntu Linux
Rocky Linux
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Oracle Linux
SUSE Linux Enterprise
CentOS
openSUSE Leap
Windows 11
Windows 10
Oracle Solaris
Debian
Google Chrome Enterprise
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Windows Server Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which is better, Windows Server or Windows 10?
- Which would you choose, Oracle Linux or Oracle Windows Server?
- What operating system will be a good alternative for SLES?
- Oracle Linux or RHEL; Which Would You Recommend?
- What change management solution do you recommend for users to adapt to Windows 10 updates?
- What operating system do you use in your business?
- When evaluating Enterprise Linux, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best Windows MSI installer?
- Which operative system would be a good alternative for DevOps?
- What features do you look for in an operating system?