Windows Server Reviews

What I like most about Windows Server is that it's easy to use.

I would like to see better performance and more integration options in the next release of Windows Server. 

I've been using Windows Server for quite a while now. I'm not sure how long.

Windows Server is stable.

I would rate Windows support five out of 10. 

Installing Windows Server is pretty straightforward. You don't really need much IT knowledge to deploy it.

We pay for a yearly license

I would rate Windows Server five out of 10. I would recommend it to others. 

We are using Windows Server as a cloud server.

I have found Windows Server to be easy to use and the performance to be good.

I have been using Windows Server for many years.

The stability of the Windows Server has been good.

We have been using the same Windows Server release for years, we haven't needed to buy another one.

We use Windows Server primarily as a file server and as a mail server and has been working well with 20 users.

We do our own technical support within the company.

The implementation process for Windows Server was fine, we did not have any problems. It took us less than a day to complete the implementation.

We have a team that handles the implementation.

The price of the solution should be less expensive. There is an annual subscription to use the solution.

The solution has fulfilled its requirements.

There are many operating systems that people can use, such as Linux and Windows Server. They all work well for their purpose.

I rate Windows Server a six out of ten.

We used Windows Server to run SQL applications and a few remote desktop applications.

The solution is easy to use.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

Windows Server is scalable.

We have approximately 20 people in my organization using this solution.

Windows Server is easy to configure. However, it takes approximately three months for the full implementation.

We used integrators to do the implementation of the solution. We have one technician that works on the solution.

Windows Server's whole licensing model is complex because if you have, for example, Microsoft Office and end-user applications installed on a server with a remote desktop, then the licensing can be complex. If the model could be simplified it would be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for hosting applications on the server. 

The on premises to cloud migration should be easier. 

I have used this solution for ten years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.