Trend Vision One Reviews

Vision One is the primary endpoint security product we use to protect our Macs and PCs. We also use the server product version, so it runs on my servers as well. We exclusively purchase Trend Micro's endpoint products. They have network and firewall products. We were using their email product until last month, and I ended up selecting a different provider. We stayed with them for the endpoint, but I moved off of them for the email product.

Vision One was a big deal to us immediately because we did not have context-aware before. We saw everything we had no idea was happening. It was a big deal three years ago. 

It certainly reduces time to detect because a lot of the time, I didn't have it before. I didn't have that information until it gave it to me. The speed of response helps me know much more about what's happening quicker. They have some improvement to do in terms of automated remediation. It probably makes investigations 30 percent faster because of what it puts together. 

When we purchased Vision One, what set it apart was that it wasn't a traditional signature-based antivirus. It's a process-aware solution that provides real-time protection. That was a big differentiator three years ago, but now it's a given that every AV provider should be doing that. It combines signature-based telemetry with behavioral awareness and a detection-based solution, making it a good solution for us.

When we bought it three years ago, it was separate. Apex One handled cloud and web app security, and Vision One handled cloud and server workload protection. Now, they call it Vision One. The server stuff is still separate, but it is the same now. When we purchased it, they told us we'd have a single console, but that took about two and a half years. Finally, there is a single pane of glass. 

One of the things that made me the craziest was that we had too many tools or one tool that I had to log into five different ways. One of the frustrations is you have both legacy and newer detection methods. Not being able to fully investigate it in a single portal was a huge pain.

They need to stop changing Vision One once a week. They're in a hurry to change things so badly and so fast that I can't find where stuff is half the time, which is a challenge sometimes.

I've given one piece of feedback to their product guys. One thing that they're trying to make is a SIEM. It's a product where you input all the logs from your tools, and it creates additional insights into how things look. They've been kind of playing the "me too" game on that, even though that's not what I bought the product for.

They have a new gateway where I can take my firewall of email logs and send it over there. In theory, it's supposed to do a more comprehensive evaluation of all my stuff to improve that risk index score. I'm not impressed with it, and I've told them as much. I feel if you're good at something, you should keep working on that and not try to be all the things to all the people. 

I bought a different email solution even though it would have been 10 times easier to just stay with their email solution because they aren't great at it. They are great at other things, but they're playing the "me too" game with some of their products. Their competitors do this, so they should be doing this, too. They need to pick a product and keep being good at that. If they're going to roll new things out, they should do it but do it right. 

They have a button to isolate an endpoint because it looks bad, but it doesn't usually work. I've had no chance to argue with the product guys to show them examples of how their button doesn't work. You think it does, but it doesn't work in a real environment. That can be a challenge sometimes.

I can see in the data showing what is a false positive. But it doesn't save me time helping them figure out how to fix the problem in their engine. It can help me identify it as a false positive, but it doesn't apply that consistently. It will ignore the false positive for that device, but if they start detecting a false positive on Apple devices, I have eight thousand Apple devices and get 8,000 alerts. I can tell that specific false positive, but it doesn't learn from that particularly well.

We use the executive dashboards, but I don't find them particularly useful. One is the ability to customize. That has gotten a little better, and it'll be better in the future. Most of what they have on there are data points that are generic and not particularly actionable. That's why it's called an executive dashboard. Executives want to see if we are secure, but it's hard for me to find out why our attack surface risk went down by x percentage. I don't know. It says that on the dashboard, but it doesn't give me specific details about why.

I find it confuses my executives, and it's not useful for me because it doesn't give me things to work on. It will give me generic things on the executive dashboard like you have a thousand accounts with an old password. Those are big generic things, but I also can't tell it that our password policy is different from what your automatic detection model means, and I don't have a problem with that, so quit lowering my risk score. 

The risk score is useless. In theory, it's based on the random intelligence they're getting from their various customers. I'm in K-12 education, so they have a decent amount of K-12 customers, but it's a subset, and the baseline of what's common in K-12 education is not the same. There's not enough data to make that particularly clean or useful. Vision One is not custom, and that's part of my beef. That index score is based on whatever random report they're looking at from their data sources at any given moment in time. It's nice, but I'd rather have one that's based on your particular circumstances. Instead, it's saying that the number one attack threat surface for school districts is email phishing. It's too generic.

I have used Trend Vision One for three and a half years.

Vision One has been less impactful toward my endpoints when scanning than the previous solution. 

Vision One's resource usage is starting to creep up compared to three years ago. They used to focus on making their agent lightweight. I don't necessarily think all of this is their fault, but their agents are starting to suck more resources than they used to. Part of it is that the threat landscape has changed, and you need to look at it in additional ways, and it is a strain on the servers. They've gotten really bad about that on the servers.

I rate Trend Micro support three out of 10. Their technical support is challenging. The support's good once you get to the second layer, but they don't read what you write. They auto-respond by telling us to give them the logs. 

Every time, I need to send them a written statement with my product license ID and that I'm the contact authorized to do a support ticket. About 75 percent of the time when I open a support ticket, I immediately email my customer service satisfaction manager person with the ticket number so they can help move it along.

Negative

I was using Sophos three years ago. I've looked at many of the feature sets out there, and they might be 80 percent of what Vision One has, and some might be better, but Vision One is price-competitive.

Deploying Vision One was a pain because of the automated removal tool. In the antivirus world, they try to make it difficult to uninstall people's defenses because that's what an attacker would do. However, all the competitors are making tools to uninstall their competitors' tools when they win business. That's directly counterintuitive to the whole point of the antivirus. 

We went through a process of trying to do this in an automated fashion to replace the old product, and Trend didn't quite do it right. Trend had a real struggle toget their own tool to fix it. 

We use it as a SaaS, so we have a gateway integrator on the server on-site, but the product sits on all my endpoints. In that aspect, it's on-prem, but all the processing, reporting, and everything else happens in the cloud. We had it 75 percent deployed in 45 days. That last 25 percent took us another four months.

I work at an underfunded public school district. I need a whole team, but there is only me. I used to have a security analyst until that position moved around, and
my ability to use the product has been drastically reduced. I miss much of the value of what I'm paying for because I don't have enough staff to use it. I wouldn't need more than one if that was their whole job. 

It's not a totally elegant solution that always feeds and cares for itself. We have to check if it's doing its updates properly. It doesn't tell us, for example, that 2,000 devices haven't been updated or checked in. I have to go proactively looking at it.

Vision One's pricing is extremely competitive. They're probably the lowest-cost provider that has this feature set. 

I rate Vision One seven out of 10. Make sure you learn the 90 percent of stuff in there that you didn't know you bought and preestablish an escalation contact for support tickets. 

Our use cases for Trend Vision One are monitoring and alerts.

The biggest challenges we wanted to address with Trend Vision One were securing endpoints and enabling us to quickly respond to incidents or threats. This is the main goal for using this solution.

Trend Vision One has improved the way our organization functions by acting as both a monitoring tool and an antivirus, giving us insight on potential threats and enhancing our response time to security incidents. It is hard to measure the time savings but we save a significant amount of time in responding to potential threats. For example, we don't expect employees to respond to emails, chat, or calls outside of working hours. Trend Vision One has a feature where we can block all access to the laptop or endpoints. It allows us to take immediate action without waiting for the user to respond.

In terms of reducing noise from false positives, unfortunately, some behaviors can be mistaken for bad behaviors, but that isn't the fault of the software itself. It largely depends on how the developers of other applications implement their software and how it is run. We encountered an issue with another software called Rapid7, which periodically runs a command on MacBooks or Apple operating systems. This command, which is quite lengthy, searches for any unsecured credentials or API keys related to GitHub on the laptop. The way the application triggers is significant: it runs under root privileges, executing that command in the terminal for the user. Trend Vision One picks this up as a suspicious command, interpreting it as an attempt to find unsecured credentials. Despite having whitelisted the entire command in Rapid7, Trend Vision One still flagged it. We went back and forth on this issue, but ultimately we decided that it wasn't worth further troubleshooting to silence this alert due to the potential for actual malicious use of such commands. While we could whitelist it, we did not want to risk it being exploited maliciously. In the end, we chose to ignore the alert. They helped us reduce some other noise, but there was some noise that we weren't able to reduce.

Vision One AI has been very useful. All IT people stay up to date with security risks, exposures, alerts, or attacks. Vision One AI helps us explain or understand the alerts and what actions are recommended.

The workbench alerts are something we find very useful, as they help us stay informed about various activities. Not all alerts are positive, but they provide valuable insights into the detection methods and help us understand how certain issues arise. For example, if someone attempts to run a piece of software that encrypts a file, one of our tools, which is used for evidence gathering in surveillance systems, may encrypt the file too quickly. As a result, Trend Vision One may trigger an alert. Although this is a false positive, it still gives us insight into the behavior involved. This allows us to investigate the alert further and provide feedback to the user or development team, letting them know that similar triggers are likely to occur with other security systems or software.

Other useful features include intrusion and mailbox alerts, suspicious unauthorized access, tracing logs, website clicks, and email filtering for bad attachments.

The improvement I have been asking for is an easier way to create MDR requests. Not all alerts that come through Trend Vision One receive an investigation, and we would like the ability to easily request an investigation on lower-scored alerts without logging into the support portal to create a ticket.

I would like to see Trend Vision One and OfficeScan consolidated into one platform. Currently, it is the same space but two different layers. It would be nice to have both combined instead of having two clients.

There is room for improvement when it comes to support.

I've been working with Trend Vision One for three years.

Trend Vision One is stable enough. We don't see many performance impacts on our endpoints, except for when our weekly scheduled scans happen. Our developers express that it limits how freely they can develop, but I personally appreciate the insight it gives us and the actions that allow us to take on our devices.

I would rate their support a six out of ten. We encountered an issue with one of our tools—specifically, Visual Studio. One of our developers faced difficulties debugging code because Trend Vision One was blocking the debugging application or causing it to crash. This problem stemmed from a Windows update, and it took us a month and a half to identify the root cause. After we opened a ticket either at the end of March or early April, we waited several more weeks for a solution. Although the Windows update occurred back in February, we didn’t receive the fix until the end of May. The interaction between Windows and the application played a significant role in the issue, as the debugging application starts the code and injects itself into the running application, which Trend Micro flagged as problematic after the latest Windows update. Fortunately, this issue has now been resolved, but it was indeed a painful experience. Our developers were understandably frustrated that they couldn’t debug code for a month and a half, which impacted our project timelines.

Neutral

The company previously had SentinelOne before my time, and I can say that SentinelOne was not effective. 

We currently use Rapid7 as our Managed Detection and Response (MDR) service. In my experience, both Rapid7 and Trend Vision One serve similar purposes, but they have distinct differences. There are times when Rapid7 provides us with more detailed information, while at other times, Trend Vision One offers greater insights. This is partly because Trend Vision One collects more data from the devices, allowing it to better identify the root causes of alerts compared to Rapid7. 

Additionally, I find that the MDR team at Trend is generally more responsive than that of Rapid7. However, there are some disadvantages as well. For instance, we haven't yet set up cloud monitoring capabilities with Trend Vision One. Rapid7 currently handles our cloud infrastructure monitoring and manages services like Office and Okta. While Rapid7 is equipped to monitor these services, Trend Vision One is not yet at that level. We are exploring ways to enhance its capabilities, and if it can provide the same level of service as Rapid7, we might consider discontinuing our use of Rapid7 altogether.

We use the SaaS solution. I was not involved in the initial setup and deployment process, which occurred prior to my time here, but I have readjusted some policies.

Previously, it was difficult to understand some alerts. However, as time goes by, we differentiate better between them, and the AI feature is an extremely good tool that explains things that are gibberish to the regular user. The learning curve is quite steep.

It has helped us understand some of the alerts that we did not comprehend.

It is an all-around solution that includes various modules for comprehensive security monitoring and alerting. This solution is particularly effective when integrated with other hardware or on-premises solutions, such as Deep Discovery Inspector, which monitors your network.

The interface is adequate, but it is constantly changing. New features are being added, and items are being rearranged almost daily. We might have missed some announcements regarding these frequent updates. As it is an evolving solution, such changes are to be expected. However, there are still features that are buried within menus, which previously required extensive searching to locate. For instance, until last year, isolating endpoints was only possible through the search function. Now, they have added a feature within the endpoint inventory that allows you to select devices and isolate them immediately, rather than having to jump through multiple hoops to access that option.

The application has also become slightly more responsive. Regarding its functionality, the insights it provides are quite useful. The application displays various actions, and you can drill down into alerts to view the execution path associated with them. For example, if an application triggers an alert, you can right-click on that alert and select "Check Execution Profile." This feature shows you where the process started, what actions it took, and where it ended. This improvement is beneficial for understanding how tasks are executed.

I would rate Trend Vision One an eight out of ten.

As a security architect, I design solutions for our end customers. In previous projects, we've successfully implemented Trend Vision One for customers with cloud-based assets and email servers, enabling them to extend security coverage to their remote clients.

The current market trend in email security solutions focuses on mitigating threats like phishing attacks. These widespread attacks occur across various points in the cyber kill chain process. Whether initiated from the perimeter or targeting cloud-based assets, monitoring all north-south and east-west traffic is challenging. Trend Vision One helps by providing a comprehensive analysis of these email phishing attacks, identifying the attack origin, parameters, and information extracted from attack patterns.

Trend Vision One offers centralized visibility and management across all protection layers. This comprehensive view provides valuable information for CISO/CIO presentations, including attack patterns, threat actors, and areas for predictive analysis. Such insights are crucial for informing policy changes and other security enhancements. The visibility also helps with efficiency.

We can summarize any technical information we receive using widgets and then present it to executives in a dashboard format.

Our customers adapt the risk index feature to align with the specific needs and conditions of their individual environments.

We have used Trend Vision One in several projects where our customers consolidated security across hybrid environments. The consolidation effort, particularly utilizing Vision One's AI-driven features, streamlined investigative analytics. Furthermore, merging multiple solutions into Vision One provided comprehensive insights, which proved invaluable for policy development.

The ability to manage risk and maintain visibility has improved by approximately 20 to 30 percent, significantly simplifying our tasks. Operationally, this has led to a 20 percent reduction in effort.

Trend Vision One has helped reduce detection and response times by 30 and 40 percent, respectively.

Trend Vision One has saved more than a week's worth of effort in investigating false positives.

Trend Vision One's automation capabilities have helped us save between 60 and 100 hours monthly. 

The most important features of Vision One include visibility, AI integration, attack pattern analysis, predictive analytics, and centralized visibility and management across protection layers. These features are very important to us. 

There should be improvements in risk quantification, where the risk is displayed in a quantified manner, showing the dollar value loss. The integration with third-party OEM solutions also needs enhancement, particularly in UEBA integration with Trend. Sometimes, there are blind spot discoveries that are not completely successful. Improving automation to avoid manual triaging and providing more insights on dashboards is desirable.

While Trend Vision One's attack surface risk management helped identify some vulnerabilities in our environment, the feature needs improvement. Specifically, the blind spot discovery is unreliable; for example, a missed blind spot in one environment led to an attack and subsequent investigation.

Automation should be improved to eliminate the need for manual effort in initial L1 triaging. Additionally, dashboards should provide more insightful analysis, including various mappings to the MITRE ATT&CK framework and Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures.

I have been working with Vision One for almost almost two years.

The support in Trend Micro is good.

Positive

I have worked on Exchange servers, and we are using Palo Alto to a certain extent. These were not from the XDR or EDR point of view.

The analysis shows that Trend Vision One has improved our ROI by 30 percent.

Competitors offer comparable solutions at slightly lower prices, so Vision One has room to reduce its pricing by 15 percent, given that Trend Vision One charges approximately $10 per endpoint.

We evaluated other options but not to the same extent as Trend Micro because I was more familiar with Trend Micro solutions.

I would rate Trend Vision One nine out of ten.

We use Trend Vision One for the XDR and we absolutely love it, especially the full visibility into protected assets. It's incredibly easy to identify weaknesses across systems and manage any outdated software or areas needing attention directly within the user interface. Previously, we juggled multiple dashboards, but the new version has streamlined everything into a single, unified dashboard. This has significantly simplified our workflow and improved manageability. In essence, we can now manage multiple products seamlessly within the same Vision dashboard, which is a considerable improvement over the previous system. This year has brought significant and positive changes to our workflow.

We use XDR across Office 365 in the cloud and on-premises environments to safeguard our assets. This includes protecting our server environment, workstations, and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, ensuring comprehensive endpoint security.

Our deployment utilizes a hybrid model, making agent deployment incredibly simple. We employ several different deployment methods: on-premise deployment through Active Directory and utilizing various tools. In case a system leaves the network for any reason, we have third-party solutions in place. We have multiple RMM solutions that can be rapidly deployed in these packages. For example, I've recently observed systems being spun up and sent home before antivirus protection was activated. We still have the opportunity to deploy these solutions in the cloud automatically. So, we have a few ways to work around this and deploy those agents, making it easy to deploy either on-premise or in the cloud. We can address several scenarios and push out to those endpoints.

Coverage is extremely important. We want to ensure visibility into all assets across the network, whether it's a workstation within the office or someone working remotely. This visibility is crucial even when they're outside the network or using cloud-based software, especially since we have no on-premise infrastructure. With the rise of remote work, having this extra visibility into devices, whether at home or abroad, is invaluable. We appreciate the ability to see what's happening on any asset, regardless of its location. This allows us to monitor running processes, identify vulnerabilities, and push necessary updates, ensuring we maintain connectivity and security no matter where devices are operating.

Trend Vision One offers us comprehensive visibility within a single dashboard, which is crucial since we manage numerous other products and security solutions with various dashboards. The simplicity and centralized visibility provided by Trend Vision One significantly streamline our operations. Managing a multitude of security products across our environment necessitates consolidated visibility to minimize back-and-forth navigation. Having all the necessary information in one place is essential for us.

We use executive dashboards to generate weekly or monthly reports that provide a risk score index. This index helps us identify areas needing attention and understand the teams' focus. We then share this information with IT senior management. In addition to our reporting, we receive a monthly report that allows us to compare our current status to the previous month's and highlight new challenges, team weaknesses, and ongoing efforts. This comprehensive view enables the executive team to monitor the team's continuous progress.

We utilize the risk index feature to monitor and mitigate potential environmental risks. One example of this is how we proactively worked to reduce the risk index score of a recently acquired company. Their antivirus product was expiring, so we opted to purchase additional licenses for our existing Trend Apex One product suite instead of renewing it. However, this integration significantly increased the risk index score due to numerous previously unmanaged devices on their network. To address this, we systematically worked through the risk index list, identifying outdated software and determining if it was still in use or could be safely removed. By leveraging the risk index in this way, we successfully lowered the score and ensured the secure integration of the newly acquired company into our environment.

It took some time to fine-tune Trend Vision One before realizing its benefits. A significant concern was integrating it into our virtual environment, a complex process. However, we gained significant visibility once set up in our VDI, leading to further adjustments. We fine-tuned the environment, removing unnecessary elements, which is especially crucial for our non-persistent VDI, where VMs reset if anything goes down. Through these tweaks, performance improved, and the extra visibility provided by Vision One highlighted areas needing attention, allowing us to optimize the environment gradually.

We use Trend Vision One within Azure, expanding its monitoring capabilities to both on-premises and cloud assets, including Active Directory, which is synchronized from our on-premises environment. This hybrid setup covers assets locally and in the cloud, including Office 365, and Trend Vision One effectively manages security across this environment. It has simplified the process, particularly for virtual environments, providing enhanced visibility and flexibility compared to previous products. The additional visibility has been invaluable, enabling us to address previously undetected vulnerabilities and mitigate risks.

During XDR and managed services pen testing exercises, we identified some weaknesses. They were able to automatically crack some accounts. As soon as one system was breached, the managed services team contacted us, escalating until they got a response. We could see their process in action - their steps and what they did in the backend. We provided them with details about the events and the ongoing pen test. It was an excellent test to see that the managed services worked as intended. There was a breach; they asked if we were aware and stated they would isolate the device if we weren't. We acknowledged we knew about the ongoing pen test. Throughout these exercises, they reached out immediately, demonstrating their focus on alerts, their process for triaging them, and their communication with clients.

The attack surface is directly related to exposure and risk. Any identified vulnerabilities, such as outdated software like older versions of Office or Google Chrome products, are flagged immediately. We use third-party solutions to address these issues across all workstations. Whenever we detect internal or internet-facing exposure, we prioritize remediation based on criticality. External-facing vulnerabilities are patched first, as they pose a greater risk than those affecting only internal assets. We rely heavily on exposure risk and risk index to determine priority and ensure the most critical vulnerabilities are addressed first. This helps us identify blind spots in our environment. Take the new acquisition as an example; many devices were unprotected and lacked crucial Windows updates. Numerous products and workstations required immediate attention. Security wasn't the initial priority, so we addressed that and ensured it became one. We implemented numerous changes with acquisitions to align them with our security standards.

Trend Vision One has significantly reduced our mean time to detect and respond to threats by 60 percent. It centralizes all information, enabling us to identify and address vulnerabilities quickly. For example, if we discover multiple devices running an outdated version of Office 2013 missing patches, we can easily compile a list of those devices and share it with the responsible team for remediation. This visibility allows us to proactively address weaknesses across the network, such as deploying updates or the latest release of third-party software to mitigate risks. Trend Vision One has been instrumental in enhancing our overall security posture.

The managed services significantly reduced the time we spent investigating false positive alerts. In uncertain scenarios, we consult the managed services team. If unsure about anything, we use the AI companion for questions. If we encounter an unfamiliar flag or event, we research it independently and involve the managed services team's professionals for deeper investigation.

We have implemented some automation but haven't fully explored its capabilities. We have a few playbooks for tasks like blocking user access based on IP addresses or email content. Since we use Office 365 in the cloud, there's also a lot of automation for handling incoming emails, such as blocking and sending alerts. While we've used playbooks to a limited extent, there's potential for further automation, and we plan to explore this further.

The most significant recent change has been the addition of the new AI companion. This feature has proven invaluable, especially when integrating with third-party products or resetting the dashboard, as it provides detailed step-by-step guidance. In fact, we were able to resolve all issues independently, without needing to contact support, thanks to the AI companion's comprehensive answers.

The only downside to Trend Vision One is its complexity. It's a comprehensive product covering a lot of ground, which can be a little intimidating initially. The user interface, in particular, can take some time to get used to, with menus that could be better organized and a dashboard that could be more user-friendly. Due to the sheer complexity of the product, navigating and familiarizing oneself with the environment requires some effort. While the initial learning curve might be steep, the product's vast capabilities justify the time investment.

I have been using Trend Vision One for two and a half years.

I would rate the stability of Trend Vision One nine out of ten. I haven't experienced any crashes or issues in the last few years since we started using the product. While there are occasional upgrades and minor changes that require adjustments, the overall stability is excellent. We have no complaints, especially considering the VDI environment, our primary focus, has been running seamlessly. The lightweight agent minimizes resource usage, further contributing to smooth performance.

I would rate the scalability of Trend Vision One nine out of ten. We successfully scaled it up by adding approximately 250 workstations and deployed the product within a week. We replaced their previous product, scripted everything, integrated it into their on-premise servers, and deployed the agents. The 250 additional assets were integrated within two or three days, providing complete visibility in the dashboard. The team then took over and identified any weaknesses. In summary, scaling up and adding 250 workstations was easy to implement.

The technical support and service are excellent. After our new acquisition, we encountered a few issues that we hadn't seen in our environment compared to theirs. Through troubleshooting, we determined that the problems weren't caused by the product itself but rather by corruption in specific systems. We systematically worked through the other products, disabling them one by one. The troubleshooting experience was excellent, and we reached a resolution within a couple of days of contacting support. They were very professional and provided direct answers, resulting in the issues being resolved correctly and in a timely manner.

Positive

In the past, we have used a few different products, including Sophos and Cylance, which we have used for the past couple of years. We also used Trend's older products, like OfficeScan, about eight or nine years ago. We eventually moved away from those products due to their lack of AI capabilities. After trying other products, we returned to Trend with Apex One and Vision One. We've been happy with the product, and its virtual environment capabilities were a major factor for us. Trend has consistently been the best performing product for us, so we decided to continue using their products with Trend Vision One.

The initial deployment was straightforward. We leveraged our existing products to force and uninstall the previous product, opting for a custom scripting approach rather than standard GPOs or internal solutions. This allowed us to uninstall the old package and ensure the new installation was reflected in the dashboard, streamlining the process and enabling us to proceed seamlessly to the next phase. Overall, the deployment was straightforward from our perspective.

We deployed Trend Vision One during COVID, which took approximately one and a half weeks because the server side required additional fine-tuning for all the exclusions.

We implemented the solution in-house. We repeatedly reached out to obtain basic information and guidelines on the VDI component and the virtual environment, specifically regarding steps for managing the virtual environment when closing a gold image and imaging numerous workstations with a single image. Due to the complexities involved, we requested documentation. However, our internal team completed the entire deployment with limited support from their support team, following the provided instructions.

The pricing is fair compared to other solutions. It's within the price range we're looking at for a single endpoint, and fair pricing is important to us.

I would rate Trend Vision One nine out of ten.

The Trend Vision team handles all maintenance on the SaaS backend. Internally, we only need to update the VDI environment occasionally because it's a non-persistent VDI, meaning it's locked down and reverts to its previous state upon reboot. We periodically open the gold images to perform maintenance, update signatures, and force program upgrades, but this is only a monthly task. So, we spend minimal time managing the solution.

Before implementing Trend Vision One, ensure you gather comprehensive documentation. Adhering to the guidelines will streamline setup, and any queries can be resolved using the efficient AI companion. Users can pose questions or access documentation directly from the Trend website. Initially, focus on familiarizing yourself with the dashboard, risk indexing, and the executive dashboard. Explore the product, ask questions, and continue experimenting and seeking assistance once deployed. The process is straightforward once you've had the opportunity to explore the system thoroughly. The primary challenge is becoming comfortable with the interface and navigating its features effectively.

Our infrastructure utilizes Trend Vision One for endpoint and cloud-based security. While all our endpoints are cloud-based, allowing us to deploy Trend Vision One in the cloud, we also maintain endpoint-specific protection. Currently, our network infrastructure is not fully integrated with Trend Vision One. The platform primarily monitors our backend infrastructure and provides initial response capabilities.

I implemented Trend Vision One to consolidate log inspection, integrity monitoring, intrusion prevention, and application control into a single platform, eliminating the need to switch between multiple applications.

Trend Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers, which is crucial for compliance. It allows us to show audits of what’s going on and keep all evidence in one place. This centralized visibility has improved our efficiency, as it means just one login is needed to complete all necessary tasks, maintaining focus and reducing distractions resulting from multiple sources.

The Vision One executive dashboards effectively communicate our company's overall security posture by providing a clear risk overview. Executives appreciate the simple visual cues, with green indicating low risk and yellow signaling high risk, allowing for quick and easy understanding of our current security status.

I immediately recognized the benefits of Trend Vision One because, unlike our other security applications, it provides comprehensive visibility.

I utilize Vision One's risk index feature to assess our organization's risk level and benchmark it against our peers. This comprehensive evaluation allows us to understand our current risk profile, identify areas for mitigation, and determine acceptable risk thresholds. The risk index feature is essential to our business operations.

Attack surface risk management helped us identify blind spots in our environment and provided detailed remediation strategies. This works as a second pair of eyes that helps look for vulnerabilities, which in turn improves our security posture.

Trend Vision One improves our detection and response times by identifying vulnerabilities and summarizing mitigation strategies.

Trend Vision One helps reduce the amount of time we spend investigating false positive alerts by 80 percent.

I love Trend Vision One for its robustness, allowing us to deep dive into a lot of information. The Trend hunting feature is beneficial, providing the opportunity to investigate and see what's happening, using frameworks such as MITRE ATT&CK to analyze logs. Its risk index feature allows us to see risk status quickly and provides valuable insights into our security posture.

The only issue I have with Trend Vision One is the credit structure, which is confusing. An easier way to understand the credit structure would be helpful.

I have been using Trend Vision One for over five years.

Trend Vision One is stable and does not crash. In my experience, it has not shown any instability issues.

Trend Vision One is scalable. We can increase or decrease according to needs, although pricing changes when scaling.

Trend Micro's support response time can be slow. The quality of assistance varies depending on the issue. However, reaching qualified technical engineers can be challenging due to lengthy escalation processes.

Neutral

I've used many alternatives before, like Avast, SonicWall, and Mimecast. These alternatives don't have all the integrated features of Trend Vision One, particularly the server and workload capabilities.

The initial setup required deep diving and using resources such as help centers. Despite not being straightforward, it was manageable.

The deployment took three days.

I implemented Trend Vision One in-house with the support of team members, using resources like software guides and videos.

Trend Vision One is an expensive product.

I would rate Trend Vision One eight out of ten.

The most significant security challenge we face is zero-day attacks, which exploit vulnerabilities unknown to us. While Trend Vision One provides some protection, it cannot catch all zero-day threats, leaving us potentially exposed. This inherent vulnerability in our security poses the greatest risk.

Trend Micro handles most maintenance, but we are responsible for installing agent patches on our servers.

New users should understand that Trend Vision One is different from other solutions they might have used. Reading and fact-finding are crucial. They must ask the right questions.

We primarily use Trend Vision One for its XDR capabilities, email security features, and MDR services offered through ServiceOne. Leveraging these Trend Vision One products allows us to provide robust security solutions to our customers.

My customers range from small non-profits with 40 endpoints to large enterprises with over 2,000 endpoints across diverse sectors, including energy, manufacturing, finance, and software.

Vision One possesses machine learning predictive capabilities that have already proven effective. In the past week alone, it detected and blocked two scans for unknown threats. This capability is crucial, especially since our predominantly Canadian customer base faces an elevated risk of cyberattacks from China due to the recent government-level ban on TikTok. Consequently, we anticipate an increase in attacks. Trend Vision One boasts the largest zero-day initiative, renowned for its proficiency in detecting such threats.

The single console in Vision One streamlines cross-layer detection, threat hunting, and investigation, incorporating sandbox analysis and log search capabilities. It allows for endpoint isolation, remote shell establishment, and integration with tools like Active Directory and Microsoft Entra ID. Automated playbooks enable actions such as endpoint isolation, custom script execution, forensic investigations, user lockouts, and password resets, all of which are customizable. This automation is crucial for containing threats outside of working hours, as playbooks can be configured to automatically execute actions based on specific criteria, mitigating damage before staff return.

The single console provides comprehensive visibility across the entire IT security environment, including endpoints, cloud activity, workflow protection, email protection, and mobile device management, all within a single, unified platform.

Trend Vision One integrates with a range of security products, including various SIEM solutions, vulnerability management tools, and select firewalls. A comprehensive list of compatible products is available on Trend Micro's website.

Trend Vision One is relatively easy to learn for those with some security background. While first-time users may find it initially confusing, abundant learning resources such as YouTube videos and comprehensive documentation are available to help users quickly familiarize themselves with the platform.

Some of my customers maintain hybrid environments, and Trend Vision One enhances visibility by consolidating all systems into a single platform.

Trend Vision One has malware scanning capabilities, allowing it to detect, quarantine, and block malware effectively.

Trend's Managed Detection and Response service provides continuous 24/7 monitoring, effectively reducing staff workloads by eliminating the need for in-house security monitoring.

Trend Vision One improves my organization's visibility by consolidating security functions into a single console. These capabilities enhance our security operations, making it easier to manage threats.

Trend Vision One's most valuable feature is its centralized console, which provides comprehensive security features, including attack surface risk management. This allows for benchmarking our risk score against similar organizations based on size, industry, and location. Additionally, it offers endpoint vulnerability assessment, user behavior analytics, and standard XDR detection capabilities.

An area for improvement is integrating more tools with Trend Micro's SIEM. Expanding compatibility to include currently unsupported security tools, such as firewalls, would be beneficial.

I have been using Trend Vision One for approximately four months.

Trend Vision One is scalable.

To improve support, the company should streamline communication and reduce response times. Specifically, support tickets often require customers to provide redundant information, creating unnecessary extra steps in the process.

Positive

Overall, I rate Trend Vision One a ten out of ten as I am extremely happy with Trend Micro's capabilities and their platform's strength.

Trend Vision One is easy to maintain.

We use Trend Vision One as our primary security solution on all endpoints, servers, and clients in our environment. Through third-party integrations, we’ve also connected solutions from other vendors (including VMware and Fortinet).

Trend Vision One has increased our endpoint visibility and reduced attack vectors. We can now identify and respond to vulnerabilities and threats faster. This has reduced our response time by an estimated 25–30%. Vision One provides notifications about specific risks and helps us understand where the general risks lie, enabling proactive mitigation.

With other vendors, we’ve had to manually check for vulnerabilities in products and assess whether those vulnerabilities were relevant. Now, Vision One handles much of that process. It provides detailed information for each user and endpoint about existing risks and how to mitigate them.

I often compare patching vulnerabilities in Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) to playing a game — the goal is to collect as few points as possible. The lower our score, the more secure our environment is. And like in real life, there are ups and downs because new risks arise daily. Vision One is an important tool for communicating risk assessments to management while also helping operational staff understand what risks mean and how to reduce them.

The feature I find most valuable in Vision One is CREM. CREM helps our company identify blind spots. It provides detailed information about the actions and improvements we should take to secure our environment, and gives concrete recommendations about how to resolve vulnerabilities.

As part of our Service One Complete service agreement, we have bi-weekly meetings with a Technical Account Manager (TAM) who advises us on improving security settings and informs us — even between meetings — about new attack scenarios and how to counter them.

It’s hard to pinpoint areas where Vision One could be improved or where additional features are needed. I’ve been working with the solution for three years, and Trend Micro is constantly developing. Sometimes, it’s hard to keep track of all the updates and added features.

I feel that Trend Micro is now better at identifying my needs than I am at recognizing them myself.

Vision One has been in use at the company for three years.

The stability is excellent. In my opinion, performance and availability are both very good.

The scalability of the solution is very good. We have not encountered any limitations as our environment has grown.

I would rate customer service extremely positively. Support responds quickly, and together we’ve been able to solve all challenges in our day-to-day operations. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate customer service and technical support a 9 — there should always be room for improvement.

Before Trend Vision One, we used a solution from Kaspersky. The switch was prompted by the German BSI’s security warning regarding Kaspersky's antivirus products.

I was heavily involved in the rollout and deployment of the solution. Implementation was relatively quick and smooth. We used a deployment script distributed to endpoints through our software distribution system.

Our rollout strategy started with a small number of endpoints being configured with antivirus and policies. After reviewing and refining the policies, Vision One was rolled out in phases to the remaining endpoints.

We needed only one staff member for the implementation of Trend Vision One, and that was me.

The investment in Trend Micro Vision One has paid off, although ROI is difficult to calculate. A security solution is like a good insurance policy — ideally, you never need to use it. We haven’t had any incidents so far, and hope it stays that way.

I’ve noticed that the continuous visibility of potential risks has made our environment more secure and has enabled colleagues to respond faster, saving valuable working time.

Before we decided on Vision One, we also evaluated solutions from other vendors, including Microsoft and Fortinet. The differences between the products were not significant — they were more in the details. But since we had already been a Trend partner for 15 years (12 of them inactive), we ultimately decided to return to Trend Micro.

Three years ago, we followed a different concept: two independent security solutions with separate management and reporting. Migrating to Vision One and consolidating everything into one interface gave us a 365° view of our IT infrastructure.

Central visibility of endpoints and vulnerabilities, as well asunified management, brought a new level of focus to IT security and boosted employee awareness.

If you're evaluating Trend Micro, don’t limit yourself to antivirus functionalities. Consider other features as well — especially the Managed Services, (strong technical support), and Cyber Risk Exposure Management capabilities, which I find highly valuable.

Create a centralized view of your IT infrastructure.

Define which features are important or necessary for you.

Get a comprehensive overview when evaluating different security vendors in terms of features and costs — so you’re not comparing apples to oranges.

Foreign Language: (German)

Ermöglicht Teams, Cyberrisiken schnell zu erkennen und zu managen – durch detaillierte Einblicke und kontinuierliche Unterstützung

Was ist unser primärer Anwendungsfall?

Trend Vision One kommt als primäre Sicherheitslösung auf allen Endpunkten (Server und Clients) in unserer Umgebung zum Einsatz. Darüber hinaus sind über die Third-Party Integration auch die von uns eingesetzten Lösungen weiterer Hersteller (u. a. VMware, Fortinet) eingebunden.

Wie hat es meiner Organisation geholfen?

Trend Vision One hat uns geholfen, die Sichtbarkeit der Endpunkte zu erhöhen und den Angriffsvektor zu verringern. Wir können schneller Schwachstellen/Bedrohungen identifizieren und darauf reagieren. Dadurch konnte unsere Reaktionszeit um schätzungsweise fünfundzwanzig bis dreißig Prozent gesenkt werden. Mit Vision One wird man über konkrete Risiken benachrichtigt und lernt, wo die Risiken im Allgemeinen liegen. So kann man aktiv daran arbeiten, diese zu beheben.

Früher mussten wir aus eigener Initiative heraus überprüfen, welche Schwachstellen bei bestimmten Herstellern bestehen und einschätzen, ob diese Schwachstellen für uns relevant sind. Das wird jetzt bereits zu einem großen Teil von Vision One erledigt. Herunter gebrochen bis auf jeden einzelnen Benutzer und Endpunkt wird dediziert angegeben, welche Risiken bestehen und wie diese verringert werden können.

Ich vergleiche die Behebung von Schwachstellen im Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) mit einem umgekehrten Spiel. Es geht darum, so wenige Punkte wie möglich zu sammeln. Je niedriger unser Score ist, desto sicherer ist die Umgebung. Und wie im echten Leben gibt es Höhen und Tiefen, weil es täglich neue Risiken gibt.

Letztendlich ist Vision One ein wichtiges Tool, um einerseits eine allgemeine Risikobewertung für Führungskräfte/ Manager durchzuführen, und andererseits für operative Mitarbeiter, um zu wissen, was dieses Risiko tatsächlich beinhaltet und wie es sich reduzieren lässt.

Was ist am wertvollsten?

Die Funktion, die ich in Trend Vision One besonders wertvoll finde, ist Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM). CREM hilft unserem Unternehmen, blinde Flecken zu identifizieren. Diese wichtige Funktion zeigt sehr detailliert und umfassend auf, wo Handlungsbedarf oder Verbesserungspotenzial besteht. Gleichzeitig bietet es den Kollegen konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen, wie Schwachstellen geschlossen werden können.

Ein Bestandteil unseres Service One Complete Service-Vertrages sind zwei wöchentliche Meetings mit einem TAM (Technical Account Manager), der uns berät, wo Verbesserungspotenzial bei den Sicherheitseinstellungen besteht und uns regelmäßig – auch zwischen den Meetings – informiert, wenn es neue Angriffsszenarien gibt und wie diesen entgegengewirkt werden kann.

Was muss verbessert werden?

Bereiche, in denen Vision One verbessert werden könnte oder wo zusätzliche Funktionen erforderlich sind, sind schwer zu bestimmen. Ich arbeite jetzt seit drei Jahren mit der Lösung und Trend Micro arbeitet ständig an deren Weiterentwicklung. Stellenweise ist man gar nicht in der Lage, alle Änderungen zu erfassen oder welche zusätzlichen Funktionen eingebunden werden.

Ich glaube, Trend Micro ist derzeit schneller dabei, meine Bedürfnisse zu identifizieren, als ich sie überhaupt selbst erkenne.

Wie lange verwende ich die Lösung bereits?

Vision One ist seit drei Jahren im Unternehmen im Einsatz.

Was denke ich über die Stabilität der Lösung?

Die Stabilität der Lösung ist sehr gut. Meiner Meinung nach sind Leistung und Verfügbarkeit sehr gut.

Was denke ich über die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung?

Die Skalierbarkeit der Lösung ist sehr gut. Wir sind bisher auf keine Einschränkungen beim Wachstum unserer Umgebung gestoßen.

Wie sind Kundendienst und Support?

Ich würde die Erreichbarkeit und Kompetenz von Service und Support von Trend Micro als sehr hoch bewerten, ich bin sehr zufrieden. Antworten und Lösungen kommen prompt, das Personal ist professionell und auf einem sehr hohen Kommunikationsniveau.

Wie würden Sie Kundendienst und Support bewerten?

Äußerst positiv. Kundendienst und Support reagieren zeitnah. Gemeinsam konnten bisher alle Herausforderungen unseres Tagesgeschäftes gelöst werden.Auf einer Skala von eins bis zehn würde ich den Kundendienst und den technischen Support für Trend Vision One mit einer Neun bewerten. Es muss ja noch Luft nach oben bleiben.

Welche Lösung habe ich vorher verwendet und warum bin ich gewechselt?

Vor Trendmicro Vision One war die Lösung von Kaspersky im Einsatz. Der Auslöser für den Wechsel war die vom BSI ausgesprochene Sicherheitswarnung vor den Virenschutzprodukten des Herstellers.

Wie war die anfängliche Einrichtung?

An der Einführung und Bereitstellung der Lösung war ich maßgeblich beteiligt. Die Implementierung erfolgte relativ schnell und problemlos mit einem Deployment-Skript, welches über das Software-Verteilungssystem auf die Endpunkte gebracht wurde.

Unsere Implementierungsstrategie sah vor, dass zunächst eine kleine Anzahl von Endpunkten mit Virenschutz und Richtlinien versorgt wurde. Dann wurden die Richtlinien noch einmal überprüft und verfeinert. Abschließend wurde Vision One in mehreren Etappen auf die restlichen Endpunkte ausgerollt.

Wie war unser ROI?

Die Investition in Trend Micro Vision One hat sich rentiert, aber der ROI ist schwer zu berechnen. Eine Sicherheitslösung ist wie eine gute Versicherung, die man hoffentlich nicht braucht. Wir hatten bisher keine Vorfälle und hoffen natürlich, dass wir auch in Zukunft keine haben werden.

Ich stelle fest, dass unsere Umgebung durch die permanente Sichtbarkeit von potentiellen Risiken sicherer geworden ist und dass die Kollegen schneller auf diese reagieren können. Das spart vor allem Arbeitszeit.

Welche anderen Lösungen habe ich evaluiert?

Bevor wir uns für Vision One entschieden haben, haben wir auch die Lösungen anderer Hersteller evaluiert, unter anderem die von Microsoft und Fortinet. Die Unterschiede bei den jeweiligen Produkten waren nicht so gravierend, sie lagen mehr im Detail. Aber da wir auch schon seit fünfzehn Jahren Trend Micro Partner sind (zwölf Jahre davon ruhend), sind wir schließlich wieder zu Trend Micro zurückgekehrt.

Welche anderen Ratschläge habe ich?

Wir hatten vor drei Jahren ein Konzept, das einen anderen Ansatz verfolgte. Zwei voneinander unabhängige Sicherheitslösungen, mit jeweils eigenem Management und Reporting. Die Migration zu Vision One mit der Konsolidierung in eine Oberfläche hat zu einer 365°-Sicht auf die IT-Infrastruktur geführt.

Die zentrale Sichtbarkeit von Endpunkten und Schwachstellen und das Management über alle Ebenen hinweg hat noch einmal einen ganz anderen Fokus auf das Thema IT-Sicherheit gelegt und das Bewusstsein der Mitarbeiter für dieses Thema gestärkt.

Wenn Sie Trend Micro evaluieren, beschränken Sie sich bitte nicht nur auf den reinen Virenschutz, sondern beziehen Sie auch die anderen Funktionen in die Betrachtung ein. Insbesondere die Managed Services, der Technical Account Manager und die Cyber Risk Exposure Management Funktionen haben für mich einen hohen Mehrwert.

Schaffen Sie eine zentralisierte Sicht auf Ihre IT-Infrastruktur.

Definieren Sie im Vorfeld, welche Funktionen für Sie wichtig sind bzw. Sie benötigen.

Verschaffen Sie sich einen umfassenden Überblick bei der Evaluierung verschiedener Sicherheitsanbieter hinsichtlich Funktionen und Kosten, damit Sie nicht Äpfel mit Birnen vergleichen.

Welches Bereitstellungsmodell verwenden Sie für diese Lösung?

Private Cloud

Falls öffentliche Cloud, private Cloud oder Hybrid-Cloud, welchen Cloud-Anbieter verwenden Sie?

Verschiedene.

The primary use of Trend Vision One is for its Endpoint Detection and Response and Extended Detection and Response solutions.

To address challenges with our attack surface management, we implemented Trend Vision One.

Trend Vision One's most valuable feature is its endpoint firewall rules.

The centralized visibility and management have been very important to us, as it allows for an effective EDR or XDR solution with central management. Without such solutions, I cannot imagine dealing with problems efficiently. The executive dashboards are used for main reporting and central management, improving readability.

Trend Vision One's attack surface management capabilities are a critical feature that we utilize.

Integration with other tools and deploying in hybrid environments need improvement. The deployment can be complex, and we'd like an easier process, especially when integrating with on-prem and cloud environments.

The high number of false positives in Trend Vision One presents a challenge. Reducing these requires extensive exclusion and allow lists, which are difficult to manage effectively.

I have been using Trend Micro Vision One for one year.

Trend Vision One is scalable.

The technical support is not good. We have to purchase support separately and the engineers are not readily available.

Neutral

We previously used Sophos and Microsoft Defender. For hybrid, we switched to Microsoft Defender due to easier integration with on-prem and cloud. I would recommend Trend Micro for Linux and mixed environments.

The standard deployment of Trend Vision One was straightforward and took approximately 24 hours to complete with two people involved.

Trend Vision One offers a competitive price-to-value ratio.

We evaluated Microsoft Defender and Sophos before switching. Microsoft offers more options for attack surface reduction rules compared to Trend Vision One.

I would rate Trend Vision One eight out of ten.

We have 400 users of Trend Vision One in our organization.

Two administrators are required to manage Vision One.