Trend Vision One Reviews

We use Trend Micro XDR for rapid response to end-user computing and security concerns.

As a health system, one of our core challenges is ensuring full visibility into our attack surface. We have many thousands of endpoints and end users that must be properly secured and protected. Our primary use case was to improve visibility, and response time, and reduce complexity. That is why we chose Trend Micro XDR.

Trend Micro XDR is deployed on Trend Micro's private cloud.

We are using Trend Micro XDR on our endpoint and server infrastructure. The coverage is extremely important to our organization.

Trend Micro XDR provides us with centralized visibility and management across protection layers.

The centralized visibility and management across protection layers have helped our efficiency. The most significant advantage is that we used to manage these platforms with three or even five engineers, and now we're managing them with one.

It is extremely important to us that we can drill down from the executive dashboards into XDR detections. This provides us with the single pane of glass view that I mentioned previously. Being able to see at a high level that there may be systems that are behind on patch levels or need additional service or support, and then being able to drill down specifically to an individual machine, which may be unique in our environment, is very helpful.

We use the risk index to evaluate ourselves holistically, including our performance against best practices and security, as well as our performance against other healthcare systems around the world. This allows us to identify areas where we may have vulnerabilities or where we are particularly strong so that we can focus on improving in the areas where we need to.

Trend Micro XDR has helped us improve our resource utilization through automation, reducing manual effort and enabling faster response times. In under a week, we had tuned our environment to perform optimally.

Trend Micro's Managed XDR service has significantly reduced our team's workload by nearly 50 percent, providing a big improvement in our overall threat intelligence and endpoint security.

The Managed XDR service has enabled our team to work on other tasks. This additional availability for our staff has allowed us to reduce our need for contractors. If we are overburdened, we will hire contractors to assist in other areas of the business. However, because we have become more efficient, I have been able to hire some of those contractors and reduce the burden of contract labor.

Attack surface work management capabilities have been extremely valuable. The user and identity services provided by CREM help us to focus on and improve visibility into end-user behavior, including that of endpoints such as laptops and desktops, the network, cloud infrastructure, and applications.

The ability to detect our blind spots has significantly improved our security posture. Seeing everything clearly in a single, easy-to-understand dashboard allows us to allocate our resources directly to where they are needed most, enabling us to respond faster.

The biggest advantage of Trend Micro XDR is that it has helped decrease our time to detect and respond to threats by around 50 percent.

Trend Micro XDR has helped reduce the amount of time we spend investigating false positive alerts by 60 percent.

Trend Micro XDRs automation capabilities save us around ten hours per week. 

We are very impressed with the single pane of glass visibility that Trend Micro XDR provides. It allows us to work from a single console instead of having to use four or five separate tools to maintain the same level of security. This is extremely helpful.

The manageability and artificial intelligence built into Trend Micro XDR are extremely helpful.

I've seen a lot of improvement in just the year that we've been with Trend Micro. However, I think that continued optimization of the environment towards automation and orchestration, a kind of layer that sits underneath all of the technologies, would be extremely important. When we look at the speed and sophistication of attacks today, such as ransomware, malware, and cyber threats, we need tools and technologies that can react faster. So, I think integration with automation, orchestration, and artificial intelligence will help tremendously.

I have been using Trend Micro XDR for one year.

Trend Micro XDR is remarkably stable.

Considering our growth rate of nearly 30 percent per year, Trend Micro XDR is scalable enough to keep up, so we have no concerns.

Technical support is exceptional. They are extremely engaged and supportive of everything we have needed.

Positive

We previously used Sophos but switched to Trend Micro because of its enhanced capabilities.

The initial deployment was straightforward. The deployment took between one and two weeks to complete. 

Moving between security tools requires an analysis of the existing environment to understand the current configuration, rulesets, and architecture. This analysis is quickly followed by implementation to improve the security posture and validation to ensure that the infrastructure is not only properly protected, but better protected than before.

Three people were required for the deployment.

We have been able to reduce some labor costs and use our resources more efficiently. These savings of hours per week are definitely a return on investment.

The solution is fairly priced.

I would rate Trend Micro XDR ten out of ten. The solution works extremely well for us. In a healthcare environment, the types of data and the sheer size of the attack surface are somewhat extraordinary. Having the enhanced capabilities of the Trend Micro toolset has been very important to us, and I strongly recommend it.

We have 11,000 users, five acute care hospitals, and around 80 clinics.

Two people are required to maintain Trend Micro XDR for the investigation of threats and incidents. When threat intelligence comes in from Trend Micro or we receive an alert, we validate or respond to it. A lot of this process has been automated, which has helped tremendously.

I strongly recommend Trend Micro XDR and advise doing a proof of concept against any current tool on the market, as it works extremely well and a POC can clearly demonstrate this in a short period of time.

We use Vision One to detect to detect and respond to malware incidents. With endpoints (Apex One/Cloud One Workload Security), network (Deep Discovery Inspector) and Office365 (Cloud Email and Collaboration Security).

The environment is complex, distributed in more than +100 locations. Some locations are just offices, some others are industrial facilities with ICS and SCADA. Besides Windows, we deal with a lot of operating systems, including Solaris on SPARC. And our users are diverse, with lots of employees roaming around the country.

With CREM, we tackle important use cases around identity protection and risk management in general. Identification, prioritization, and remediation.

The full stack of Vision One has delivered what "SIEM 2.0" couldn't deliver. The capability to monitor threats and discover attack vectors before they are exploited and across all our workspace (on-prem, IaaS, PaaS and SaaS). We have invested well over a million into SIEM during the last decade. A full ArcSight upgrade and then a Splunk migration assisted with a large MSSP. Vision One is still ahead at a fraction of the cost.

Going through a capable, single-vendor solution was necessary, given our small team. Choosing the best solutions for every task and building all the integrations was not an option.

Vision One is much more than just EDR for us; it is a threat intelligence platform and a SOAR too. And even with the limited capabilities in this area, we find ways to tackle challenges our MSSP and SOC haven't been able to accomplish on a very large budget.

I like everything. The most valuable feature is how the stack fully integrates all components of a solution. Then, integrations with third parties will be provided.

As an example, I am capable of sending a suspicious file directly to my Deep Discovery Analyzer appliance (a sandbox) while investigating a suspicious download/file interaction, and I can then quickly push the IOCs in the suspicious object lists to protect both managed endpoints, and the rest of the network too! Yes, you can push domains and IP addresses to Palo Alto through a Trend Micro Service Gateway, ensuring you can protect even what cannot receive an endpoint. And all this without writing a single line of code. The ease of use and ease of deployment for use cases like this are my favourite features.

The SOAR features (Security Playbooks) are quite limited. At the moment, it is impossible to execute a simple piece of Python code that would pull or push something to an API, for example. While you can tackle some use cases, a SOAR from another vendor is still a must-have.

To assist with complex use case integrations, having all the data from the SIEM inside XDR would be great, too. That's where the market is moving with solutions like Falcon Logscale and Cortex XSIAM. Pivoting from XDR to Splunk or vice-versa can be time-consuming during incidents.

I was actually an early beta tester of the Apex One Endpoint Sensor before Vision One appeared in 2021. That would be three solid years of using it.

Quite reliable. In the last three years, only one incident created memory leaks on Windows Servers. We didn't see too much impact (fortunately) as a workaround could be quickly provided.

Support is quite responsive when something does work well. However, we do pay for Premium support.

The scalability is really good.

My experience is generally good, but I have had the chance to deal with premium support. I'd say I get the support I expect for the price that I pay.

Positive

Although we have been dealing with other security vendors (McAfee, Symantec, Proofpoint, and more), Vision One was really our first EDR.

The initial setup was a breeze. It is realistically one of the strong points of the solution.

We implemented the solution in-house. Although with premium support, you do get a lot of help from Trend Micro if you ask for it. You'll be able to talk to actual experts.

It is very hard to quantify an ROI on a security product. It doesn't generate revenues, and you can't quantify the cost of incidents that didn't happen.

Product names are changing all the time. Lots of changes in the last three years. They introduced the concept of credits, too, which did not make anything easier.

It's also easy to underestimate the credits required with Cloud Email and Collaboration Security: people invited from third-party tenants will count.

The credit usage and allocation tool has been improving, at least.

We had a look at Carbon Black and CrowdStrike Falcon.

It's probably the best solution for a small team that cannot absorb the complexity of a multivendor solution. The ability to execute VS the cost is surprisingly good.

We use Vision One together with the other products in the Trend Micro security stack, such as XDR, Site Management, and Apex One. 

Vision One has made our detection and response time much faster. We have 30-plus integrations, helping us to identify the most critical threats. The more connections, the better. We can also identify and resolve false positives faster. 

I like Vision One's workbench. It provides helpful logs that I can search, and the telemetry is excellent because I can see what's happening during an attack or potential attack.

Another one of my favorite features is attack surface risk management. It shows me faults and blind spots in my security. I also like the attack phase management. The model shows the risks in the corporation and provides considerable information about what is happening on the platform and the network, offering more visibility. There's also a risk index that shows me where I can improve my security. 

Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across multiple layers. This is critical because I need to see what's happening. It also allows me to set separate rules and policies for some security areas. 

Vision One's search could be improved. While the platform is very user-friendly, the search feature uses terms that aren't as intuitive. The automation is excellent, but I wish there were more templates to help me optimize more things. 

I have used Vision One for nearly a year.

I rate Vision One nine out of 10 for stability. It has only crashed once. 

I rate Trend Micro support six out of 10. They respond quickly but the answers aren't clear sometimes. They don't always understand the issue, so I need to explain a lot.

Neutral

I previously used the Microsoft 365 security stack, but I found Microsoft's XDR lacking. We also used Microsoft CASB and Defender for Endpoint. Vision One's threat intelligence and modeling are better. It has all the features like attack surface and risk management as well as the workbench. I also find Vision One easier to navigate. 

Vision One is easy to deploy. It's mostly automatic, but we needed to deploy some of the agents manually. If you can deploy all of the agents to the endpoints automatically, it takes only about five minutes. 

Vision One is expensive, but I think it's a typical market price. 

I rate Visione One nine out of 10. I recommend fully exploring Vision One's features. It has many features that you don't need to pay extra for. There are so many things to explore. For example, they have free playbooks for third-party integration.

I use the solution primarily for EDR. The top challenges in our industry are the accuracy of the detections and the visibility of alerts and events.

We are accessing it via the cloud, and we are monitoring the endpoints and cloud servers. 

Vision One provides centralized visibility and management across protection layers, which is critical for tracking threats, viewing vulnerable assets, and understanding the overall security posture of the organization.

Vision One helps me a lot when it comes to reporting. The reports are very detailed and informative. There are recommendations and analyses of how to mitigate threats. We have comprehensive visibility.

The executive dashboards are very helpful for us in assessing our security posture. We can see what needs to be prioritized and mitigated first.

The risk index feature helps us make security improvements and implement security policies. It helps to have robust security.

Vision One helps to harden security controls and policy implementations.

Vision One improves our organization's security posture by allowing us to apply more robust security controls, implement security policies, and improve the security culture. The centralized visibility enables more efficient security operations.

Vision One makes it convenient to assess and mitigate or block threats across the organization. The XDR is collecting data from more than one client or company and correlating it. The XDR detects the loopholes or vulnerabilities of the system. It uses MITRE ATT&CK techniques to identify and respond to cyber threats or vulnerabilities.

Vision One improves our security posture because we can patch any vulnerable machines that are prone to risks and attacks.

Vision One has decreased our time to detect and respond to threats by 50%.

We use automation capabilities, especially when there is a breach or a risk activity with the user or the endpoint. It helps us by isolating devices automatically. This automation saves us about 20% of the time.

I love everything about the solution, especially the XDR features, the attack surface management, and the workbench alerts. It oversees vulnerabilities among the system and devices, prioritizing areas that need patching.

When I started working with it, I knew nothing about this solution. I found it very user-friendly and easy to understand.

There are limitations in terms of threat response actions. 

I have been using Vision One since December 2022. It has been about two years.

There are some errors with the solution. I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

It is scalable. I would rate the scalability of the solution as eight out of ten.

We have clients of various sizes. Our clients are small, medium, and large organizations.

The customer service or technology is responsive, but they take a minimum of one day, and up to three days, which is too long.

Positive

I previously used Azure Sentinel. Vision One is an advanced solution compared to Azure Sentinel. I prefer Vision One because of the convenience and easy correlation.

The initial setup is complex due to the various cloud resources that we have. We have workstations, servers, etc. Its implementation can be simplified.

It did not take us very long. We migrated from Apex One to Vision One. It did not take long.

It provides returns on investment by saving about 50% of time, money, and resources.

I find it to be a cost-efficient platform.

I would recommend this solution. It helps a lot when it comes to security. It covers endpoint security, email security, web security, and data leak prevention. It has everything.

I would rate Vision One a nine out of ten.

Trend Vision One has advanced sensors that collect telemetry from various sources like endpoints, email, and network. Workbench then correlates data to provide visibility across the entire environment. If there is any virus in the environment, it correlates the information, shows where it started, who the user is, and how it traveled through the environment, thus providing complete visibility and infrastructure correlation.

Trend Vision One consolidates security and saves time.

Trend Vision One is a cybersecurity platform in which Trend Micro has integrated every kind of solution. You have an MDR solution. You have an email security solution. You have endpoint protection. You have server protection. You have EDR. You get everything in one console, whereas vendors like Kaspersky and CrowdStrike do not have only one console. With Trend Vision One, you get all the solutions in one web console or platform. 

It helps with faster response. You have telemetry from different sources, which makes it easy to do analysis and respond. Its automation capabilities help to isolate endpoints and respond. You can respond in multiple ways. You can revoke permissions or terminate any process. You can isolate an endpoint. You can run a script. You can automate in different ways and integrate scripts, playbooks, etc. It saves time.

Centralized visibility is valuable. We can view what kind of virus or threat exists, where it has traveled, and how it started. A security analyst can use just this one console to view all the information.

Another valuable feature is its automation capabilities, which help in responding to any kind of alert swiftly.

Currently, there is nothing specific that needs improvement. Their support is very cooperative, and they provide an educational portal for learning the solution. However, deployment could improve by considering customer environments that are not fully updated.

I have been working with Trend Vision One for the last six months.

When I contacted Trend Micro support, they were very cooperative and quick in resolving and remediating any issues. I would rate their support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have worked with Kaspersky, which offered only a single solution and not a fully integrated console. Kaspersky had multiple options but did not provide the same level of centralized visibility as Trend Micro. Kaspersky has graphs for visibility whereas Trend Vision One has both graphs and Workbench. Workbench provides a wider overview, whereas, with Kaspersky, you can only see a sketch of where a virus started or where it ended. Trend Vision One tells you how and through which user a virus came into your environment and how it traveled through your infrastructure.

There is a big difference in the price. Trend Micro solutions are more expensive than others.

It can be a bit complex. Trend Micro has a requirement that endpoints should be fully updated. In customer environments that are not connected to the Internet, that can be an issue. Trend Vision One is a cloud platform. If the endpoints are not updated, you can have multiple errors when you deploy the agents. We find such issues in customer environments.

The initial deployment time depends on the infrastructure. It took us about a month to cover 1,000 endpoints and 200 servers.

Trend Micro solutions are very expensive compared to other solutions. Even though everything is in one console, each feature requires a separate license.

If you do not have any compliance regulations preventing you from using a single vendor, I recommend adopting Trend Micro's cybersecurity platform for full security coverage and reduced management time.

The Risk Index feature helps with the attack surface and risk management. It detects vulnerabilities in your environment and calculates the risk in your environment, but I have not yet used this feature.

When you deploy such a solution in your environment, there is always a huge amount of false positives. The false positive rate depends on how your security engineer has done the configuration. After some time, the false positive rate reduces. The reduction in the false positive rate depends on your infrastructure. If you have a huge infrastructure, it would take some time. It also depends on your security resources who work on this solution. If you have only one person, it can take about six months, but if you have a team of five security people, it would take about a month.

I would rate Trend Vision One a nine out of ten.

We use Vision One XDR for our endpoint security. Our company has nearly 4,000 users. We have endpoint cybersecurity agents for which we can use XDR. 
Trend Micro has multiple subscription licenses for individual Vision One components. There are also licenses for XDR for endpoints. We have adopted four packages from Trend Micro: endpoints, workload security, mobile security, and email security gateway.  

We didn't realize the benefits immediately after deploying the solution, but we saw results quickly. When you install Vision One, the policies are set to the default setting. It scans your machines, and you get alerts if someone is attacking, there's a vulnerability that must be patched, or there's a Trend vulnerability you're patching somewhere.

It has reduced our detection time. The detection is quite fast, but the response at the SOC level might take time. Vision One can be used to conduct analysis first. It reduces the investigation time because Trend Micro has an advantage in Pakistan. They have local technical resources deployed here. Organizations can get heavy false positives, but Trend Micro can help you define the policies accurately.

Our primary focus is DLP, and Vision One has solid DLP features. We also use URL filtering and device blocking, and there's telemetry for identifying exploitable vulnerabilities.

It offers us centralized visibility. That's the advantage of Vision One's unified platform with data lake capabilities. They pull telemetry data from the endpoints, network devices, and cross-layered architecture, and Vision One performs filtering and analysis.

Additionally, Trend Micro can integrate third-party tools, such as Fortinet, Cisco, or any other vendor's firewall, to get the logs and alerts from them. Vision One is much more capable in that way.

Having that centralized visibility has improved our efficiency. The organization has multiple tools segregated into separate windows that give you a particular type of visibility. Multiple SOC team members can view the same window. The beauty of Trend Micro is its ability to integrate all of the systems in one cloud platform, right, in terms of Vision One. From your workbench, you can easily monitor and centrally manage alerts. My SOC team is happy with it. 

The risk index feature is a rich view that rates any alert on a scale of 1 to 100 and classifies it as internal or external. Few OEMs can provide that sort of capability. The index ratings provide a window into device health and how alerts can be resolved. 

The attack surface management is a fantastic feature with a proactive approach. Normally, organizations do pen testing quarterly or once a year, but attack server management proactively checks user authentication or changes in your environment. 

Vision One's functional capabilities are excellent, but the platform can be upgraded and simplified in many ways. We use multiple playbooks to automate many things, but I'm not sure there are mature cybersecurity applications. There are several external alerts, and their behavior changes daily, so I'm not sure automation can help you that much. We're using the playbooks, but it might require some improvement.

We have used Vision One for two and a half years. 

I rate Trend Micro support eight out of 10. They stick to the SLA and respond on time. They are cooperative and supportive. I'm very satisfied.

Positive

We have evaluated multiple vendors, and Trend Micro is among the best. You cannot have a typical apples-to-apple comparison. There are a lot of things which we need to compare. Other tools may not be at the network level or have the third-party integration that Vision One has.

Deploying Vision One is easy. You can deploy it with a few clicks and configure the policies or use the default ones. It's flexible and user-friendly, and there are no headaches. The deployment time depends on your environment. If you have thousands of endpoints, it takes some time, but it's just a few minutes if you have a couple. 

Trend Micro is pricey, but it has more capabilities than a standard XDR, so the customers consider it reasonable. The market has accepted it. Trend Micro has a 64 percent share. 

I rate Trend Vision One nine out of 10. 

I primarily use the solution to prevent attacks. 

It's good for detecting malware and anomalies. We use it on our endpoints. 

The user interface is very good. Everything is all on one single platform.

With this product, we get centralized visibility and management across all of our protection layers. With a central platform, we don't have to look around across different websites or platforms. We can go right on the portal and manage things. It also helps us reduce the learning curve. We can manage and monitor products from the same place instead of learning different platforms. It's also helped us increase efficiency.

We have made use of the executive dashboard. It greatly increased visibility. We get a risk management view and metrics that help us narrow down and find issues. It helps us reduce risks. The risk index feature gives us a score to help us in our security goals. With it, we know what's the baseline or standard, so now we know what we need to do in order to meet the standards out there in the industry. We can see everything we need to in one glance. 

It's kept up to date and is consistently improving. This helps us protect our environment. 

The patch management has been very useful. They help recommend what needs to be installed.

We leverage the attack surface risk management capabilities. It shows the entire incident, including how it happened. We can use the information when we're doing forensics.

We've been able to reduce our mean time to detect and mean time to respond. What would previously take us two to three hours to fix, we can do in one hour or even half an hour. We've also been able to reduce the amount of time we spend investigating false positives. 

We'd like to see more use of AI around analytics and controls. 

I've been using the solution for five years. 

The stability is good; I'd rate it eight out of ten.

We're a small-to-medium-sized company. We have it deployed to less than 5,000 users. 

I'm not sure of the scalability. It works for us and our company size.

Support is okay. They could be more responsive and could provide more communication channels. 

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution. 

I'm more of an end-user. I do not handle the installation aspect. The deployment was done a long time ago. 

The tool does not require much maintenance. 

I'm not familiar with the exact pricing of the solution. My understanding is the licensing is reasonable. 

I'm an end-user and customer. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It has very good management and monitoring benefits. 

We use FireEye, Microsoft Defender, and Trend Micro for our endpoint solutions. Trend Micro.

We implemented Trend Vision One because we have many production servers and wanted to secure all endpoints.

We are planning to move our XDR to the cloud, but all of our production servers are currently on-premises. 

Trend Vision One's ability to cover all our servers is important because we can detect and quarantine any vulnerabilities as well as block and isolate third-party applications from being installed on our servers.

The centralized visibility empowers us to monitor and manage all our servers from a single console. This includes generating reports, deploying security updates, and identifying offline or outdated servers.

The centralized visibility and management across protection layers have helped increase our efficiency. We receive alerts and make changes all from one place.

Trend Vision One helps us protect our servers, specifically our older servers that are not supported by Microsoft.

It has reduced our time to detect by 50 percent.

Trend Micro XDR has reduced the time spent on false positive alerts by up to 40 percent.

The zero-day vulnerability is valuable. As end users, we may not be aware of exploitations and Trend Micro makes suggestions to update to protect our endpoints from attack.

The automation capabilities on-premises could be improved, as we currently have to manually activate servers and push policies.

I would like the uninstall process of agents to require two-step verification.

I have been using Trend Vision One for ten months.

Trend Vision One is stable.

Trend Vision One is scalable.

The technical support is good but we sometimes face delays because they will only respond to our partner who then relays the information to us.

Positive

The migration from on-premises to the cloud allows us to access the cloud and on-premise servers from the cloud. The migration is not complicated but some rule-based ports require a lot of approvals and assistance from our network team.

The migration can be done in a few hours if all the ports are available.

Two people are required for the migration.

We used a third-party service from JVS for the migration.

I would rate Trend Vision One a nine out of ten.

For the on-premises deployment, maintenance is required because we have to manually check the connectivity of the agents. One person is required for the maintenance.

I recommend Trend Vision One, especially for older servers that are not supported by some other endpoint solutions.