No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Systems Analyst at The Bethany Group
User
Aug 14, 2022
Excellent support and documentation with flexible pricing
Pros and Cons
  • "Their support team is extremely helpful, and they are pretty friendly and knowledgeable."
  • "They have the best support I've experienced with any vendor I've worked with up until now."
  • "The only thing that can use improvement is the StarWind Management Console and Command Center."
  • "The only thing that can use improvement is the StarWind Management Console and Command Center."

What is our primary use case?

We are running the StarWind HyperConverged Appliances as our Hyper-V Cluster hosts. Our old solution was a three-node Hyper-V Cluster that hosted our VMs. We now have a two-node setup using StarWind HCAs that run/host our Hyper-V VMs in a similar Failover Cluster. This saves room in our Data-Centre and provides a modernized solution compared to what we used. The two hosts each have their own storage bays that host all the VMs and also use the StarWind software to store our VMs in CSVs, allowing us to have even more replication on top of the RAID-5 node runs.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind's Appliance improved our organization by no longer having a single point of failure. Our previous solution had a separate storage bay where the StarWind HCAs each have their own bay that can hold all our VMs and run replication using the StarWind Software.

Our old solution only supported Gigabit connections, while the StarWind solution also supported 10GB. Each node runs two Mellanox interconnects and came with two 10GB ports for our usage. We now have two cables running from the nodes through to the rest of our network and have set up SET (Switch Independent Teaming) for our Hyper-V Cluster solution.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable thing I have found is the 24/7 Support. Their support team is extremely helpful, and they are pretty friendly and knowledgeable. They monitor your hardware and provide support when you migrate to the new service. 

During our migration, we have sent multiple requests for support and made changes that have caused the network connection to flap. Within minutes of the nodes flapping, we would have a new ticket open with StarWind with them requesting information about the downed Node(s) and asking us if we require any support on getting them back up. 

The team has benefited us and offered support and documentation for the migration and general inquiries about their Hardware/Software.

What needs improvement?

The only thing that can use improvement is the StarWind Management Console and Command Center.

The management console needs to be restarted each reboot, and you must manually reconnect to each node to see the status. If this could be an automated process or if it auto-connects when you start the program, that would be fantastic.

The Command Center is a great tool, but it stores the ISOs in one of the CSVs, meaning that each ISO uses a lot of storage space compared to one copy. Since each node runs RAID-5 and the two nodes are replicated using the StarWind software, we are essentially using over three times the storage. 

Also, it doesn't feel like the Command Center adds anything compared to using the OS's Hyper-V or Failover Cluster managers.

Buyer's Guide
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind HyperConverged Appliance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for about two months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, we've not had a single live down situation.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is very scalable. Only half the slots for both Memory and SSDs were used when we built our complete solution.

How are customer service and support?

They have the best support I've experienced with any vendor I've worked with up until now. We're still only 2 months into using their hardware so we may see a change.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use another solution. We switched because our previous solution was getting to EOL and the new solution offered by that company was more expensive than StarWind for similar builds. StarWind could offer more for less money than the other vendors who wanted more for less.

How was the initial setup?

HCAs came pre-configured and only required minimum input on our end to get up and running.

What about the implementation team?

I discussed and negotiated directly with StarWind.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The staff at StarWind are willing to negotiate. They will take a look at your system diagnostics and make a recommendation, and they will also ask if you have any specific needs/wants on top of the requirements and build you a customizable solution. 

Once you are at the quote stage, they are willing to negotiate with you if you have another vendor offering you similar products for a lower price. This was one of the major reasons we went with StarWind, as they were very open about it and have been very helpful every step of the way. 

Their website support chat will connect you to your assigned sales rep if they are available, and that means the "support" agent is someone who knows your needs well.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We took a look at all the big vendors, including HPE, Dell, Lenovo, and IBM.

What other advice do I have?

Make use of the support and staff at StarWind whenever you need it. They are extremely knowledgeable and friendly. They are staff that feels like they want you as a customer and want to keep you as a customer by offering you great support. For other companies, you must wait on call, whereas StarWind has 24/7 support, and they proectively reach out to you when they detect issues.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Director of IT at BLDD ARCHITECTS INC
Real User
Top 20
May 18, 2022
Great management console, good support, and great performance
Pros and Cons
  • "I do like that I can manage StarWind with a console running on my local desktop."
  • "I thoroughly recommend this product; I wouldn't hesitate to choose it again."
  • "Although the setup documentation was very complete and succinct, I found StarWind documentation to be a bit sparse."
  • "Although the setup documentation was very complete and succinct, I found StarWind documentation to be a bit sparse."

What is our primary use case?

This is used for a two-node VMware Horizon View Cluster. This cluster supports our VMware Horizon View environment. We are a smaller environment supporting about 65-70 users. This disk is all SSD. We support a variety of users from typical office production staff to CAD, Adobe, and some light 3D work. So far the users have been pleased with the performance, even with Adobe products - which is saying something. 

We have a small on-site data center. All files and prints are on HP DL-380s with HP and Meraki networking. 

How has it helped my organization?

This was at a hardware refresh. I was replacing the old three-node cluster with a two-node cluster and going from discrete software/hardware to a Hyper-Converged Appliance. Obviously, the performance was outstanding, however, at a hardware refresh, it better be!

I have noticed a definite increase in performance all around. I would say we were most limited in our previous cluster by disk. There just is no comparison to SSD

Even with that said, the HCA screams. I've very satisfied. Install, setup and migrations were foolproof. I love that it's being monitored 24/7. I have previous experience with StarWind support and I know it is excellent. 

What is most valuable?

Having already been familiar with StarWind there really weren't any big surprises but SSD will always be faster than spinning disk of course. I do like that I can manage StarWind with a console running on my local desktop. There is not a lot of management that needs to be done but it's nice not having to go to the Windows server running StarWind, since it is all running on an "appliance" now. I also appreciated the way support walks you through all the startup and migration phases. I appreciated that they were always there to assist and instruct.

What needs improvement?

My only two cons are sort of minor and one definitely biased towards my taste in hardware vendors. The first "con" is that the hardware is Dell. I much prefer HP servers. I have had a much better experience with HP than with Dell. As I said that's just my preference. Since the hardware is a covered item I can't complain too much. I really don't have much to deal with.

Although the setup documentation was very complete and succinct, I found StarWind documentation to be a bit sparse. Not a lot of this is how this all works type of documentation. Not much on the way of reference. It is totally supported so I guess I can't complain too much. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the HCA for four months but have been using StarWind for several years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

StarWind from my experience is extremely stable. I have used the StarWind VSAN product for several years and other than self-inflicted issues it has been rock solid. I expect the HCA to be even more stable since it is all "in the box".  It has been the best storage solution I have used with VMware. I have used a variety of SANs previously. The whole virtualized SAN concept, I believe, is the smarter choice technology wise. With a smaller environment as we have, two node cluster, it makes more sense and is cheaper than VMware's VSAN product. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is highly scalable. Fortunately, we are on the lower-end side of scaling. 

How are customer service and support?

They offer some of the best customer support I've ever had.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used StarWind vSAN on my own hardware. I switched as it made more sense all the way around. It comes mostly set up and ready to go.

How was the initial setup?

The setup was simple. They will set up your nodes ahead of time. Then, they walk you through the rest of the process.

What about the implementation team?

I did the in-house part and they supported all the rest.

What was our ROI?

Our ROI is unknown.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I liked that there were no surprises. The costs were all conclusive and included everything that I needed, including migration assistance. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I was already very satisfied with StarWind vSAN.

What other advice do I have?

I thoroughly recommend this product. I wouldn't hesitate to chose it again. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
StarWind HyperConverged Appliance
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about StarWind HyperConverged Appliance. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
886,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1852095 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems/Network Administrator at Storm Industries, Inc.
User
May 10, 2022
Simple and easy to manage with helpful support
Pros and Cons
  • "The setup was easy to deploy, and management is simplified compared with traditional SAN solutions."
  • "StarWind Virtual SAN has been a great product for us; the setup was easy to deploy, management is simplified compared with traditional SAN solutions, and redundancy is achieved at a fraction of the cost when compared to other solutions."
  • "An emphasis on security can be improved."
  • "An emphasis on security can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We needed a cost-effective and simple solution to replace our traditional SAN/server setup. 

Before StarWind, we were running a two-node cluster with a single SAN. Obviously, the storage was a single point of failure and we wanted to avoid this in our next solution.  

The StarWind deployment consisted of one two-node production environment and a second two-node test environment. With each of these two nodes, we accomplished full redundancy. Our production environment runs Hyper-V with 30 VMs and is used company-wide. Our test environment runs 15 VMs.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind Virtual SAN has been a great product for us. The setup was easy to deploy, and management is simplified compared with traditional SAN solutions. Redundancy is achieved at a fraction of the cost when compared to other solutions. We opted for premier support which includes StarWind software support, OS support, Veeam support, patching, and OS updates. 

In addition, our environment is proactively monitored 24/7. We've had experience with other solutions such as NetApp and Dell SAN, however, StarWind was by far a better solution for us. 

What is most valuable?

The most important feature for us is the simplicity of the product. We are a small IT team and can't afford to spend much time managing and maintaining the servers/SAN.  

With our old traditional SAN, we had to manage servers and a complex SAN system that was connected to switches and then back to the servers. These three pieces made it very difficult to manage. We could not manage this on our own and had to pay third-party vendors to manage it for us. With StarWind, we do it all ourselves with the help of tech support.  

What needs improvement?

When reaching out to support by phone they do have a slight accent but are not too difficult to understand. 

An emphasis on security can be improved. For example, things like default passwords were not changed initially until requested. 

Veeam support was available, however, we often went to Veeam direct for slightly quicker answers. I can't really think of much else, however, if I had to split hairs I'd say that on reboots sometimes it takes a while to sync with the other node. The maximum was 30 minutes, however, 99% of the time it was three to four minutes.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using StarWind Virtual SAN for about five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability was rock solid. We have never had any downtime. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We don't have too much experience with scalability as we only had one site. 

How are customer service and support?

Customer service is available 24/7 - which is great. They have more experience with the StarWind software than with other 3rd party software such as Veeam.  The language accent can be a slight issue as well, however, it's not too bad.  Other than that, they are very helpful and friendly.  

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We had a traditional sever and SAN solution. It was very complicated to manage.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward, however, it helps to have a good amount of experience for a smooth transition. Expert level is not required. That said, admin experience in a virtual environment is very helpful. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution directly with StarWind. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Overall, the pricing was great with StarWind. Other solutions were two to eight times more expensive. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other solutions such as Nutanix and the cloud (Azure). They were much more expensive.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Igor Beck - PeerSpot reviewer
IT-Administrator at Milchwerk Jäger GmbH
User
Apr 13, 2022
Straightforward to use with good remote management and a simple GUI
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a safe, fast, and cost-effective storage system that improved our systems to have zero downtime."
  • "It is a safe, fast, and cost-effective storage system that improved our systems to have zero downtime."
  • "It would be nice if it were possible to do the ISCSI setup that you do on Windows directly in the management GUI of StarWind."
  • "It would be nice if it were possible to do the ISCSI setup that you do on Windows directly in the management GUI of StarWind."

What is our primary use case?

We are using the product primarily as the base and storage for our failover cluster on a Hyper-V Environment (Server 2012r2 - 2019). 

All 3 of the HCA are all flash variants and have a 10GB uplink to our network, sync between the nodes is 25/40GB. We have Microsoft SQL Servers, Active Directory, and file servers running across all 3 systems without any major issues so far. 

We have a VMWare ESXI with VCenter 6.7 on one of the HCA. In this scenario, the storage is inside a virtual machine and works without any performance issues. 

How has it helped my organization?

It is a safe, fast, and cost-effective storage system that improved our systems to have zero downtime. Before we used manual failover methods and systems by other vendors, that required switching master and slave roles which could result in a longer downtime. 

If a storage error occurred outside of our office hours, it could result in critical downtime and production needing to stop. Besides the business continuity, our performance levels have risen from the all-flash setup and active-active sync scenarios.

What is most valuable?

The straightforward management GUI and the compatibility catalog are great. You can add every StarWind system into one management GUI and have a complete overview of every system.

You can remotly manage new storage volumes and use the maintenance mode for moving your systems physically to other locations. 

You can practically add any NIC or RAM you want. The compatibility catalog is huge. We have a system with an Nvidia Tesla M60 and DDA which works great in combination with StarWind HCA. Also, we are mixing NICs from Intel, Mellanox, and Broadcom without any issues.

What needs improvement?

It would be nice if it were possible to do the ISCSI setup that you do on Windows directly in the management GUI of StarWind. Further, it would be nice if you expand the storage of one target, the corresponding CSV would rise the capacity as well. This would lead to lesser missed or wrong configuration steps in the loopback configuration. They could program some checkups for the ISCSI configuration that the management GUI would do and could show you possible misconfiguration that someone evidently has done.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution since 2016.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In all the years we've used the product, we have not had any major problems or issues with any StarWind systems. This reality speaks for itself.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

You can scale the system very well. You always have the possibility to add another host to your HCA complex if you need more processing power.

How are customer service and support?

We always used customer support on any new HCA setup. They do checkups and look over the configuration to make sure that everything runs flawlessly. We've used the support on two minor cases that were handled very, very well - even on holidays.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did use something else beforehand. The previous solution could only do a master/slave switch if a failure occured and there was significant downtime. The architecture of this storage was active-passive, which resulted in some performance degradation by writing always to the second member.

How was the initial setup?

If you are an experienced administrator, the setup is straightforward. Even if you have some difficulties in some parts, they have many guides and services that will support you.

What about the implementation team?

We have implemented the software-only solution by ourselves. The HCA was implemented together with the StarWind support team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Users should plan the needed space before ordering the whole system. It isn't impossible to expand the physical storage space later, however, it is a time and cost-intensive process.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We tested and used the software-only version of StarWind. We wanted to test the software and its behavior.

What other advice do I have?

They offer a custom trial license for free. Everyone who is interested in storage systems should try the software out.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1965030 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at CanPay Software Inc.
User
Sep 21, 2022
Plug and play with a great support and lots of space saving
Pros and Cons
  • "Having this all backed up by pro-active support gives us good peace of mind."
  • "StarWind, with all SSDs and directly attached servers, gave us far superior performance than our previous setup."
  • "Maybe they could have a support portal that you can have direct access to a current support representative."
  • "Maybe they could have a support portal that you can have direct access to a current support representative."

What is our primary use case?

We were looking to replace aging hardware in our environment. We had the classic two physical hosts with a SAN set up with VMware as our hypervisor. We actually had two SANs since we needed more space.  

The SANs were not redundant. They were se tup as a pool. We wanted to simplify this setup and also reduce the single point of failure. Being a SMB, we have a small office and rack space is at a premium. We could not fit more than a few more servers on our rack without purchasing a new rack and finding a spot for it.

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind, with all SSDs and directly attached servers, gave us far superior performance than our previous setup. We can now have vMotion VMs in a matter of seconds rather than minutes. 

Although we haven't removed the previous equipment yet, I'm looking forward to removing all the cables running through all the switches. Also, having all the extra space on the rack is going to be nice. This will substantially reduce the amount of noise in the datacenter. 

Having this all backed up by pro-active support gives us good peace of mind.

What is most valuable?

The solution is plug and play. I was very happy that everything was delivered all tested and setup ready to go. I simply racked the servers, plugged them in and called for setup. It's so simple.

The simple two 1U server setup with all flash disks connected together with an ultrafast redundant Mellanox nics is great. It has saved us space and increased performance. It also reduced the noise pollution and energy costs.

The proactive support is a very valuable feature. I have not yet had to use support for anything major, however, I have asked a few questions and there is always a prompt reply.

What needs improvement?

Maybe they could have a support portal that you can have direct access to a current support representative. 

During setup we had a bit of a tricky situation that had to do with switching. The StarWind engineer recognized the possible problem with migration before it happened.  

During test migration when things went down it would have been nice to be able to reach out directly rather then send an email to support and wait for a reply.  It was not a long wait, however, it can feel like forever when in a tough situation.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used the solution for six months.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1954026 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Engineer at H. W. Martin (Fencing Contractors) Ltd.
User
Sep 4, 2022
Easily expandable CSVs with remote support and reduced downtime
Pros and Cons
  • "The added speed of using standard HDD and SSD meant we could increase what services are stored on the servers without having to have additional servers."
  • "StarWind HyperConverged Appliance has made the servers redundant, reducing downtime from just having a single standalone server with a much lower hardware cost than having an extra storage device which then reduces the redundancy unless purchasing much more hardware that increases the cost significantly."
  • "We'd like an easier setup for Windows updates on the Hyper-V servers so you don't have to use a script to ensure auto-updating is done."
  • "The control center looks really good and looks like it could be very valuable. However, at the moment, not having email notifications makes it less worth it."

What is our primary use case?

We have two Supermicro servers in a failover cluster, connected via a 25GB card for faster replication and virtual nic runs through 10GB interface. The disks are hybrid standard HDD and SSD for better performance. The Starwind solution auto replicated the servers and monitors if there are any issues. 

Both are running Hyper-V on Windows Server Datacentre 2019. Each server runs about 13 virtual servers and can run all virtual servers with room to spare. 

We also have an older Dell Starwind setup running Windows Server 2016. These just run standard HDD so are much slower than the Supermicro servers. 

How has it helped my organization?

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance has made the servers redundant, reducing downtime from just having a single standalone server with a much lower hardware cost than having an extra storage device which then reduces the redundancy unless purchasing much more hardware that increases the cost significantly. 

The added speed of using standard HDD and SSD meant we could increase what services are stored on the servers without having to have additional servers. 

Also, the servers' support reduces downtime when things go wrong. The support team has always ensured we are back up and running in a short amount of time.

What is most valuable?

It offers a simple setup. The servers come pre-configured and only require a small amount of setup. The support team is on hand to complete your installation and ensure everything is running smoothly.  

Remote support ensures someone is watching the servers, letting you know if a VM has lost connection or either host has had any issues so you can check the servers and work with StarWind to get the servers back up and running again smoothly. 

Easily expandable CSVs take only a few minutes to get increased.

What needs improvement?

The control center needs email notifications so any self-monitoring is easier. The control center looks really good and looks like it could be very valuable. However, at the moment, not having email notifications makes it less worth it.

Easier CSV creation would be ideal so there are fewer steps and a check so that if you have created one, it can check all settings within the StarWind software and the ISCSI are set up. 

We'd like an easier setup for Windows updates on the Hyper-V servers so you don't have to use a script to ensure auto-updating is done. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, we have had no problems with stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is good.

How are customer service and support?

Support is always very helpful and willing to help.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The setup is fairly straightforward and issues were sorted quickly.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If you have a preferred hardware vendor, then wait for it to become available if out of stock. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other solutions.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1365102 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of IT at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Aug 24, 2022
Easy to deploy and manage with great proactive support
Pros and Cons
  • "With proactive support, StarWind deploys and configures the solution for you."
  • "On the cost side, StarWind is a really cost-effective solution, costing a fraction of what the big name HCI solutions cost yet providing similar performance and capability."
  • "The monitoring and reporting console can be improved in the sense that it can have more information on it."
  • "The monitoring and reporting console can be improved in the sense that it can have more information on it."

What is our primary use case?

The product is used to host windows virtual machines. We have various workloads hosted on this environment, from file servers, AD, DNS servers, and IIS servers to SQL databases. We run dozens of production virtual machines on this solution, and use Veeam Backup to backup all the workloads on it. 

It's a Microsoft Failover Cluster with StarWind storage added as CSV disks. The solutions can be managed via the Hyper-V console, Failover Manager or StarWind console. On the physical side, we have 10GB switches for the management, live migration and cluster communication and physically separate 10GB switches for the storage communication. Storage communication happens over the iSCSI protocol.

How has it helped my organization?

It has improved our performance and the support/time required to manage and maintain the HCI solution. It's an all-flash storage subsystem which provides really good disk read/write I/O and law latency. 

With proactive support, StarWind deploys and configures the solution for you. They also help you to migrate any workloads/VMs from the existing solution that StarWind is replacement for. 

They do proactive monitoring so if they see any issues like disk being in predictive failure or some lag/error on the solution they will reach out to you/call you proactively and will fix the issue for you.

What is most valuable?

It's very easy to deploy and manage. 

I like the idea that the storage is virtualized and that StarWind is a software company with a product that can be installed on any hardware you want/prefer. It will work with any networking equipment you have. 

Their proactive support is great and just offloads the whole management of the hardware/software of the HCI for you. The updates to the new versions are very easy and straightforward. Best of all, it's done by StarWind support engineers so you don't have to worry about it.

What needs improvement?

The monitoring and reporting console can be improved in the sense that it can have more information on it. 

Granted, StarWind takes care of the monitoring/maintenance. However, as an end-user, it would be nice if, when you login to their console, you could be able to see information about the underlying hardware and how the cluster is performing. 

It would be nice if they created hardware integration packages for various hardware OEMs such as Dell, HPE, Lenovo, etc., so you can manage the hardware via the StarWind console and be able to run firmware updates.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for more than four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solutions is very stable. StarWind have proactive monitoring so if they see any issues they will call you and will work on the resolution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Solution is very scalable. Its easy to add more nodes and StarWind support will usually pre-configure and add them to the cluster.

How are customer service and support?

StarWind support is excellent. They are very knowledgeable and thorough. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a Microsoft Failover Cluster created on Dell servers and using Software Defined Storage (Open-E).  The storage communication was via iSCSI on 10GB network switches and the cluster, live migration and cluster communication was on a different VLAN. 

How was the initial setup?

Its was very easy and straightforward. StarWind will ask you information about your switches, uplinks, IP addresses, domain name etc so they can configure the solution

What about the implementation team?

It was via the StarWind team.

What was our ROI?

18-24 months

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup is done from StarWind. It's easy and fast and therefore there is nothing to worry about there. You just need to provide them with some information such as IP addresses, subnet, DNS server, AD name, etc. 

On the cost side, StarWind is a really cost-effective solution. It costs a fraction of what the big name HCI solutions cost yet provides similar performance and capability. 

On the licensing side, generally, the customer provides the licenses for the workloads that are running on the HCI solution. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We have evaluated other HCI solutions and Storage vendors such as Nimble Storage, Scale Computing, StorMangic, Dell EMC VRTX etc.

What other advice do I have?

It's a great solution. You can set it up and forget it and is the kind of HCI where all the management and maintenance is done by StarWind support so you don't really have to do too much on a day-to-day basis. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1944000 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Conestoga
User
Aug 23, 2022
Great unified architecture, reliable support, and useful host monitoring
Pros and Cons
  • "StarWind is very resilient and built off of quality vendor hardware."
  • "StarWind appliances eliminated multi-vendor complexity and drastically simplified our virtualization landscape."
  • "At times there has been a language barrier when communicating issues."
  • "At times there has been a language barrier when communicating issues."

What is our primary use case?

We utilize StarWind HCI appliances for our virtualization infrastructure. 

We needed the ability to deploy application workloads quickly while also maintaining High-Availability and Fault tolerance. We oversee several remote locations and maintain a virtual footprint at each location. We are an agile company, and having the ability to deploy a virtual workload from any of these locations was needed. We also needed to ensure the workloads were backed up and highly available in the event of a host outage.  

How has it helped my organization?

Before StarWind, our virtualization infrastructure was combined with several different vendor offerings. This created unnecessary complexity and administrative overhead trying to support and maintain.  

We also had equipment going end-of-life, which created challenges and required 3rd party vendor warranties to keep running. Managing all the different hardware and software made troubleshooting very difficult for our team.

StarWind appliances eliminated multi-vendor complexity and drastically simplified our virtualization landscape.  

What is most valuable?

Some of the features that have brought the greatest value have been the unified architecture, reliable support, and host monitoring. Not only do we have a unified platform that is simple to use, yet their level of support has been exceptional.  

The support staff was knowledgeable and helpful from sales to deployment and migrating our workloads. An added bonus was their monitoring service.  Anytime we have an outage or an issue with our StarWind appliances, we receive an alert from StarWind support. They also monitor for updates that our hosts and software need.  

What needs improvement?

At times there has been a language barrier when communicating issues. That said, there was nothing that couldn't be worked through. This made it tough when trying to understand or explain some of the issues we were encountering.  

The user interface for the StarWind product could sometimes be tough to navigate and understand. However, that was not a deal breaker. We would like to see that simplified in the future.  

Another feature we would love to see is a dashboard that gives a comprehensive view of our entire StarWind infrastructure along with metrics on how everything is running.    

For how long have I used the solution?

Our organization has been using Starwind appliances for the last three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

StarWind is very resilient and built off of quality vendor hardware. Their software works well and rarely has issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Our experience has been positive when adding additional StarWind appliances to scale out when additional compute resources have been needed. Support is easy to get a hold of if there are any questions when scaling their appliances with additional resources or adding to a new environment.

How are customer service and support?

Our experience with customer service and support has been very positive. Sales staff helped us size the appliances we would need for current and future computing needs. 

Their support has been very helpful when dealing with any issue and their response time was quick. Their monitoring service is also very beneficial for us and allows us to focus on other IT initiatives.  

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used a virtual solution that was pieced together with different vendor hardware. We switched due to the fact that StarWind offered a converged virtualization platform that eliminated the complexity of dealing with different vendor components.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very straightforward. StarWind offered plenty of documentation on their product to give us an idea of what would be needed to integrate their appliances into our environment. 

We ran into issues when migrating virtual workloads from older hardware over to the new appliances, however, their support staff helped us manage that complexity.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution using an in-house team.  

What was our ROI?

Our ROI has been huge, considering we were able to simplify our reliance on several different vendor offerings for our virtual environment, including software-hardware warranties and licensing fees.  

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

StarWind was very straightforward with their costs, including setup, which was free. The only thing to watch out for is licensing costs for your chosen hypervisor or backup vendor such as Veeam.  

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated offerings from VMware, however, the licensing costs were too high.

What other advice do I have?

StarWind is a great solution for SMBs and offers a hyper-converged solution that is well supported and easy to deploy in your environment.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free StarWind HyperConverged Appliance Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.