Snowflake Reviews

Basically, if at all, we wanted to have an interface for data warehouses on the cloud which worked on Azure or AWS. Snowflake, provides a more intuitive, rapid user interface where people can connect and maintain warehouses and share data among the people in the companies easily. Its pricing model and the model have made maintaining virtual warehouses simpler.

I appreciate the Snowflake marketplace, where you can drop data and allow other people throughout the world to access it. You can go to the Snowflake marketplace and connect to some data. If somebody else publishes, for example, COVID-19 data or weather data, you can sign up for new data sets and bring them into your warehouse, which I found very interesting.

You can connect to different cloud sources, including Azure and AWS. 

You can report out, and all the cloud technologies have connected to Snowflake, allowing you to move the data or get the data into Snowflake. 

The initial setup was pretty simple. 

It scales really well. 

The solution is stable. 

The solution is reasonably priced. 

I don't know about GCP, if they have connected for GCP. If they don't, they should allow for it.

Overall, they're doing great. I don't have any specific complaints or improvements that need to happen.

I've used the solution for a couple of years now. 

The solution is quite stable since everything is in the cloud, and the data these days has become cheap with storage and everything in the cloud. Through clusters and warehouses, sizes can be increased or decreased based on usage, and they can be turned on and turned off. Sustainability-wise, I think it's a pretty good solution.

It is scalable. The warehouses or auto-scaling features in the warehouses are great. You can go from small to medium to large all the way up to extra large, and there are different auto-scaling tasks that can happen. You can turn it on and turn it off based on the usage or auto-turn it on and turn it off. That's a pretty nice feature to have and we find it both sustainable and scalable for sure.

I work for clients, so last time when I worked for a client, there was a group of 100 people who were actually signed up to use Snowflake. 

I've never dealt with technical support. We did have people from Snowflake working with us directly, and we never ran into any issues that needed troubleshooting. The personnel from Snowflake, of course, would resolve whatever came up. 

I come from an Azure background as well, so Microsoft also comes with Azure Synapse, where it's a similar functionality as Snowflake, where it's warehousing on the cloud. Azure Synapse is also good. I'm unaware of AWS or GCP, and I heard that Google Cloud Platform also has Big Query and big data capabilities, which are tough competitors for Snowflake and other cloud warehousing tools.

The implementation process was pretty straightforward. I didn't set it up, though. I used an already set up version. I just had to connect. I had to push data from Azure to Snowflake, create tables there, and have data loaded into those tables, and that's it. I wasn't doing anything else, so I didn't work on the infrastructure of Snowflake.

You would need a group of two or three people to maintain the product.

I work for a consulting firm, so I don't work for the client, so I really don't know what the company used for deployment.

Licensing was based on the warehouse. I don't recall it being very expensive. 

I'm a consultant and end-user.

I'm not currently using the solution right now and do not recall the last version I was on. 

Now, I'm working for a different client on a different platform altogether. My company, as such, doesn't use Snowflake since we are in consulting. We have expertise in something, and then we help the clients deliver that solution on the technology.

Potential new users should just definitely give it a shot. They should start off with a POC, proof of concept, for the data that they have, and then, if everything works well and they can migrate in a cost-effective way. 

I would recommend Snowflake to start off with since it's just picking up over the last couple of years. If I have to recommend anything, however, it would be more Microsoft tools I would recommend since that all comes as a package. You can do Synapse and Azure Data Factory, which is  for ETL. You can also do Azure Data Lake Storage. There are different things that you can do when you buy something in a package like that. That said, I definitely recommend Snowflake if someone wants to give it a shot.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We use this solution to ingest e-commerce advertising and web analytics data and completing an analysis. There are 60 people using this solution in our business. 

We are working with a TV advertising agency and they were able to set up a Snowflake data share to share ad spend with us and it was very quick to integrate.

The most valuable feature has been the Snowflake data sharing and dynamic data masking.

The cost efficiency and monitoring of this solution could be improved. It's easy to spend a lot on Snowflake and it does offer monitoring tools but they're pretty basic.

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I would rate the technical support for this solution a four out of five. 

We previously used Amazon Redshift.

 The initial setup was straightforward.

We did have a consultant help us.

We do see a return on investment.

Pricing is based on usage. It is the most expensive of our data tools.

I would advise others to check costs when implementing any changes, such as new BI tools or a new data source. Set up different warehouses for your different tools so that you can track cost.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

The primary use case is for building a database and data link.

I like the ability to work with a managed service on the cloud and that is easy to start with.

From the documentation, the black box is not very descriptive. Snowflake does not reveal how exactly the data is processed or sourced.

I have been using Snowflake for three years now.

The stability is reliable and a standard product.

The scalability is very good and we have around two hundred data sets currently operating.

Technical support is good. It is readily available and they are very responsive.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward.

You can do the implementation in-house since it is a managed service and only takes a few hours.

The pricing is economical as compared to traditional solutions like Oracle and competitive pricing.

I would rate Snowflake a nine out of ten.

We have day-in and day-out data coming from our various heterogeneous source systems. We read from that and we load data into our target tables, or rather data lake and data warehouse that is built into Snowflake. We can even translate and delete items. Apart from that, we use the tasks and schedule jobs within Snowflake. Once the data is generated into the final data material, we share it with the client for their review.

Time travel is one feature that really helps us out. If there is some data discrepancy or something wrong that happens with the table, at any point, we can get that data back and time travel via fail-safe features. They're really good. 

The feasibility to increase horizontal or vertical scaling is great. It really helps a developer at an enterprise level. If you're considering scaling, it won't take much time. 

We can create cloning via Snowflake. There's a lot of time savings.

The initial setup is simple. 

The solution could use a little bit more UI. Something was in process, however, it's not yet deployed or in the version that I'm using it is not deployed. If we have to use any table or any schema in other DB features, the prompt comes over after a dot. Whenever we are using it it would really help if it looked better. 

If you're running a procedure, it just gives a standard error instead of the exact error captured. If you have to look at it, you need to go into the history to look into which query failed, and we need to figure it out. Instead, if the error, whatever it is, is instead displayed in the history, showing the point of failure, it would be more visible. It would save some time for all the people who are using it.

There are some reporting analytics that we can use. I'm aware of those. However, if there was more reporting, we'd appreciate that. We'd like for it to become a complete one-stop-shop solution. 

We'd like to have some automation around small tasks, especially around scheduling.

I've been working on the solution for two years. 

In the past three years, I have faced instability. In just one or two instances, I would say when we were running the queries, it was not fetching any result and the error was not proper. That said, that happened in just one or two instances, in the lower environments. Otherwise, the product is very stable.

The solution is quite scalable both horizontally and vertically. It's an easy job. We just need to resize it. 

Within our module, there are around eight to ten people who are working on Snowflake. In a full project, if I'm looking at the holistic picture, there are around 30 to 40 people who are using Snowflake.

We've reached out to technical support in the past. In some cases, we were not even able to fetch the data. Or, a couple of times, in the time traveler, the pay phase time was expired and we had to retrieve that data. When that happened, we had to reach out to Snowflake support. In the first instance, they said there was downtime at that server, which we were not informed about. Since it was in the lower environment, it didn't cause an issue. 

Overall, the technical support was really good. They were on it. They helped as much as they could. For a few things they needed some approvals, and they took that. They got back to us in even less time than was required by the SLA.

Positive

We are also working with Teradata.

The main difference is that Snowflake is on a cloud server and Teradata is still a legacy system. Teradata was one of our source systems. We were loading it into Snowflake. With Teradata, when you create primary care, something constrains the way you want to do it so that you do not put an additional effort into your ETL. That changes when it comes to Snowflake. If you're clustering something on a case, obviously you end up paying the extra cost. That is one basic and main difference that we saw.

That said, you can process a huge amount of data in Snowflake. This becomes a challenge in Teradata. When we were reading the data, we had to load that data into Snowflake. When we were trying to read that data, we had to obviously divide it into chunks and then load it into Snowflake. Loading into Snowflake was like a cakewalk. Everything is moving into the cloud now. Legacy systems like Teradata just can't handle the amount of data required. 

I've worked on many of the legacy systems like Oracle, DB2, et cetera. Migration from one environment to a higher environment was a huge thing. The DVS used to take two or three days sometimes depending on how many tables or what the objects are and what they had to create. Now, with the cloning feature that we have, the idle time for the developers, or even the people who are looking at the data, the analysts, and everyone, is reduced to none. We just clone it, we load the data and the data is available without any hindrances.

The solution is straightforward. 

My Azure ID was created by the DBA. As soon as I had to log in, my user role was set up. To log in to the interface hardly took me more than two or three minutes. Compared to our Data Bricks, it was pretty simple. It's hassle-free. 

The maintenance of the DBs and the production services are normally taken care of by the team itself who's handling the production support. However, just in case, if there is something, if a huge mishap happens, which we cannot recover, or we would need Snowflake customer support help, that is when the help is taken. Otherwise, the team handles everything in-house. 

The majority of the cases that we have seen are some queries stuck somewhere and out of the blue. In the case of some source data, it decides to send you a huge amount of data on a particular day. While we have seen some mishaps, a regular case requires our developers to deal with it.

We handled the initial setup in-house. 

The pricing is fair for all the features that Snowflake is providing. The way Snowflake has emerged in the past few years is impressive. It was just a beginner in the space, and it has become a leader in the market. For all the features it provides at a basic cost, it is impressive.

There are no extra costs involved unless you need to scale and grow and need more in terms of size. When we started, a medium-size was sufficient. We'd since needed more. 

The solution allows us to suspend our warehouse as well if we would like. 

That said, even if you're paying a little more cost for the data safety that you have, you will ensure that there is no data loss that will happen. It's very impressive.

My past company was a Snowflake customer. This current company is not, however, it may be on the verge of it. 

I'm using the latest version of the solution. We switched clouds at some point. I was using it on AWS, and now it is on Azure. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate it nine out of ten. 

We use it as a traditional data warehousing application that we then set all of our reporting tools on top of.

We are able to consolidate multiple databases into one unified table for more complete reporting. That wasn't possible in our legacy tool that we were using because the query time was just too long. Now we're able to create this unified view of our entire organization and refresh it every 15 minutes; using the power of Snowflake's query is pretty much our biggest use case there.

The query speed, and the way that it actually executes its queries is the most valuable aspect of the solution. We had some queries that would take hours upon hours to run, and the Snowflake returns the results in about 15 minutes.

It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well.

One area for improvement would be the stored procedures. Currently, their stored procedures can only be executed at a transactional level versus being able to run and do updates and run things in a sequence.

An additional feature I'd like to see is called materialized views, which can speed up some run times. I'd like it to be able to be used where you can have multiple tables inside them; materialized view. That would be nice. As well as being able to run cursors, to be able to do some bulk updates and some more advanced querying, table building on the fly.

I've been using Snowflake for about four years now.

The stability has been phenomenal up until lately. We haven't had any issues until the last month. For the four years prior it was always on; we didn't have any outages. All in all the stability is great. The availability is extremely high. There's just been something in the last month that has caused outages for some periods of hours.

It's definitely scalable. We're on a very small usage compared to some of the other clients I know Snowflake has, so it's definitely scalable because we have tons of room to grow for our use.

Including myself, we currently have five users and they're data analysts.

I've only used their customer service in one or two instances, and they were very supportive and helpful. The tool is so user-friendly and straightforward that I've never really had to engage their professional services.

We didn't really have a traditional data warehouse application. We were just using Microsoft SQL Server, but we didn't actually have a traditional MPP-based data warehouse solution. We were still a very growing organization. As we continue to grow our business and increase in size, we have to get better tools that are meant to actually do what we're trying to do with other tools.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. The permissioning is a little more complicated than it needs to be. It would be nice if it just assumed permissions when you create new tables or new users, but you do have to go and actually permission to everything for individuals and people rather than when you create something. It's just because there's no default role that applies to new stuff created so it's a little more complicated than it should be.

Our deployment took about one month. I'm the only one involved in the maintenance of the solution now.

We hired an ETL specialist to come in and get us set up, but he really didn't understand our business and what we were trying to accomplish. So everything he did, we pretty much paid for and then redid ourselves. But it was pretty straightforward using tools that are built for ETL processes. Understanding the SnowSQL command line tool to a certain degree also helps.

We don't really have it commercialized or revenue-generating in any way, but what we've seen with it is we've been able to remove all of our reporting and other data needs off of production application. So we're not putting extra stress on things that we need to always have up and running in order to operate the business. That's really our security. It's more of a favorite blanket if you will, is where we're seeing the benefits.

For our licensing, we renew every January by $25,000 in both credits.

Their pricing structure is a pay-per-second usage in terms of credits, but you can get discounts if you buy them in bulk. I think it's $1.10 an hour in terms of usage. We just buy upfront and that gets us taken care of for the whole year.

We did. I evaluated Google BigQuery and Amazon Redshift.

In terms of distinguishing features between each of them, it was really just two things. One was the speed factor of query times. The other thing that really sold us on Snowflake was their ability for data sharing. They have a unique product as part of their solution that you can share information directly with other individuals, either in their own additional private cloud or if they're not Snowflake customers, simply sharing a URL link to where they can receive data themselves.

It's good to use every day. It's the backbone of our entire reporting platform for both internal and external deployments of reports and visibility. We plan on continuing to grow our usage with it, as we put more and more people into our reporting platforms and bring our customers into more self-service that's going to increase the usage of the tool by the way that it actually serves up the information to the BI platform.

It's not at this time a transactional sort of database solution. It's truly only meant for data warehousing or data laking, and there's a lot of different ways to do role-level security. So you've got to have a good plan on that, but if you're looking for it to be the backbone of a transactional application, it's not the right tool for that.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

The solution has use cases related to retail stores and sales.

The most valuable features of Snowflake are that you have to pay per usage, and you don't have to worry about the maintenance of the data warehouse because it is on the cloud.

The solution’s pricing could be cheaper. It would be helpful if Snowflake could create good reports instead of using Power BI reports.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Snowflake is a scalable solution. We have four to five customers for Snowflake who use it regularly.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

The solution's deployment in a development environment takes only a couple of minutes.

Users have to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which is expensive.

Snowflake is deployed on the cloud. The solution is providing HIPAA compliance, which is sufficient. Users looking for a pay-as-you-use product available on Azure or AWS should consider Snowflake.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Snowflake is good for analytical purposes when you have a lot of historical or sales data that you need to release and use for different types of analysis, such as tracking sales and measuring the performance of your sales team and product.

The product's most important feature is unloading data to S3. It provides a single syntax query to analyze data directly from a database to an S3 bucket.

The product's performance could be improved.

I have been using Snowflake for a couple of months. We are using the latest version.

The product is stable.

We did not need to scale our Snowflake environment beyond what we needed. We have a fixed amount of traffic from a fixed number of clients. We know the load we need to handle, and based on that, our subscription is made.

Snowflake is cost-effective. The pricing is better than Firebolt. Firebolt is better when there is idle time. If we run Snowflake all the time, the cost will be higher.

We are working on two solutions for Snowflake, one for the cloud and one for on-premises. It has good documentation. If someone goes through it, they will quickly understand how it works. However, Firebolt's documentation is more comprehensive. If I need faster results, I'll prefer the Firebolt; if I need performance, I'll use Snowflake.

Overall, I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to build the pipelines in stream sets, including data source, data warehouse, and destination endpoints.

The solution's most valuable features are storage, run time, scalability, and minimum query time compared to other vendors.

The solution's stability needs improvement.

I have been using the solution for seven or eight months.

Recently, I encountered an issue with the solution's data warehouse. The resource monitor had exceeded its quota. I rate its stability as an eight.

I rate the solution's scalability as a nine.

We use Hive and Hadoop as well. Snowflake is more stable and scalable.

The solution is more straightforward to use than the other IDBMS tools. It has a simple query process. Its computing time is less as well. One can easily have access to it. I rate it as a nine.

We use the product as a data warehouse.

The tool is very easy to use. The solution’s desktop features are also very easy to use. Also, the product’s SQL-based connectivity is also good. It can connect with any tool.

Snowflake needs to improve its programming part. Though the tool has Snowpath, it doesn’t support all features like its competitor, Databricks. Snowflake doesn’t support external data ingestion capabilities. You need to have third-party tools for that. Also, the tool needs to incorporate data integration features in its future releases.

I have been working with the solution for two years.

The solution is stable.

The product is scalable. You can scale the solution’s computation and storage features separately.

My company is a direct partner of the product. We have a lot of Snowflake experts who can resolve any doubts. Hence, I haven’t felt the need to contact customer service and support.

The solution’s setup is easy since it's a SaaS product. The tool’s deployment is fast and wouldn’t take more than two minutes.

Snowflake’s pricing is transparent. It is one of the cheapest cloud database warehouse providers. The tool follows a credit cost model. Everything on Snowflake is charged on the basis of credits. The credits depend on the cloud region and the public cloud provider that we use. Hence, the cost per credit will be different for AWS in Frankfurt and AWS in India. I think North Virginia is the cheapest region in terms of cost per credit. You will be consuming around 16 credits for large data warehouses.

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Snowflake is the market leader in data warehousing and cloud database. I don’t think that it has a direct competitor. I would suggest you give Snowflake a try if it fits your use case. You can open up a trial version for 45 days and convert it to a regular account. There are different tiers in the solution like business critical, standard, etc. The tool gets updates every week.

I am using Snowflake for migrating data and table backups.

The most valuable feature of Snowflake is its performance. We can access the data quickly. Additionally, it handles structured and non-structured data.

The solution could improve by allowing non-structured data, such as PDFs, images, or videos. We cannot see the data.

I have been using Snowflake for approximately three years.

The stability of Snowflake is good.

Snowflake is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 200 to 300 people using the solution.

The initial setup of Snowflake is easy.

If the use case fits the solution then I would recommend it. For example, if you have large data and want the rational database backed up, this solution would be a good choice.

I rate Snowflake an eight out of ten.