In my company, we use Rancher Labs as an orchestrator for Kubernetes.
We use the tool's in a local on-premises cluster version and not on a managed cloud based one.

I use the solution to manage multiple clusters, which is useful as an orchestrator. My company also uses it for GitOps functionality to have continuous delivery.

I use it for content creation, answering questions, programming help, and more.

We are using Rancher Labs for container orchestration.

Rancher Labs is used for container infrastructure, managing containers, and the deployment of containers.

This product is mainly used for monitoring. 

We use Rancher Labs primarily to deploy applications in microservices and Kubernetes environments. Our clients come from various industries, including IT and non-tech sectors.

We use this solution to optimize and manage our multi-terabyte, core banking application logs on our servers.

Rancher has two main versions which are completely different products. They have some similarities because they have a similar UI and similar concept but are different under the hood. The original Rancher was an orchestration platform for Docker containers based on Cattle and we used that solution for three years extensively for different products and on different projects. We're also now using the Rancher 2 on top of the Kubernetes to manage Docker containers for different customers, for projects, to seize logs, to seize mentorings, to downscale or upscale applications. They provide a great catalog of applications that can be created. We recently used Rancher two for another project that was hosted on top of AWS and on-premise servers. It provides and deploys infrastructures, providing UI for the dev team, the management team, QA team, and enables us to see everything that's going on.

We are using Rancher Labs' for the overall management of our Kubernetes cluster. For example, we manage the production and UAT environment of all our applications or containers.

We're not using it full-blown; the plan is you have the developers to be able to develop an on-prem and then move it over to the cloud. That was a scenario. We stood up these environments so that it would be easier for us to control our internal costs for development so that we're not spitting up these cycles in the cloud and causing more cost versus just building an on-prem and then moving it to the cloud.

We use the solution for cluster availability, deployment, monitoring, administration, etc.

Rancher Labs is used to deliver containerized applications over a containerized architecture.

We use the product to manage Kubernetes licensing, the flow of the containers, and monitoring purposes.