No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Prateek_Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Business Analyst at Netcore Cloud
MSP
Top 5
Apr 28, 2026
Monitoring has reduced downtime and now quickly identifies disk, service, and load issues
Pros and Cons
  • "Nagios Core on CentOS has impacted my organization positively because it is impactful to the business, and if the production server is down, Nagios Core on CentOS will check certain services, which impacts production."
  • "Nagios Core on CentOS is not stable."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Nagios Core on CentOS is checking disk usage, services, and load of the server.

A specific example of how I have used Nagios Core on CentOS in my environment is when I had one server that was a standard server that had been shut down due to server load, and with the help of Nagios Core on CentOS, we checked the basis of the issue, which was helpful.

The database services had been down, and we received help from Nagios Core on CentOS in addressing that situation.

What is most valuable?

The best features that Nagios Core on CentOS offers are that we can add services in the configuration files, and we have post-monitoring with a manual that checks for about thirty items.

Nagios Core on CentOS has impacted my organization positively because it is impactful to the business. If the production server is down, Nagios Core on CentOS will check certain services, which impacts production.

Regarding specific outcomes, Nagios Core on CentOS has helped reduce downtime. The downtime for the production service that was down took only one hour, which is helpful for our organization.

What needs improvement?

To improve Nagios Core on CentOS, we need to consolidate the many pages we see on the interface into a single page because we cannot check information across multiple pages efficiently.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Nagios Core on CentOS for two years.

Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core on CentOS
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Nagios Core on CentOS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Nagios Core on CentOS is not stable.

The stability issues I have experienced with Nagios Core on CentOS are that we need to make it a single page interface, similar to Zabbix.

How are customer service and support?

I did not take help from customer support for Nagios Core on CentOS, as we manage it on our own.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution before Nagios Core on CentOS.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is good, with very cheap costs, and licensing is very easy for the organization.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Nagios Core on CentOS, I evaluated other options, specifically Zabbix.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others looking into using Nagios Core on CentOS is that it is good, but we should set only one page for the services and disk devices. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 28, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Hicham Lazrak - PeerSpot reviewer
It administrator at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Real User
Jun 15, 2026
Monitoring has improved infrastructure visibility and provides timely alerts for critical issues
Pros and Cons
  • "Nagios Core on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by moving our time toward a more advanced and modern monitoring solution, resulting in a better dashboard and tools to view system health in one dashboard and also optimizing alert handling."
  • "One area that could be improved in Nagios Core on CentOS is the user interface."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Nagios Core on CentOS is monitoring my IT infrastructure, including servers, network devices, and critical services.

A specific example of how I use Nagios Core on CentOS in my daily operations is checking if a service has stopped or a server becomes unreachable; it automatically sends me an email so I can investigate and resolve the issue quickly. In another scenario, I monitor disk space and system performance on Linux servers and Windows. It is configured to alert me when disk usage exceeds the defined threshold, for example 80% or 90%, or when CPU and memory use remain high for an extended period, which helps me investigate where a problem exists and prevent outages caused by full disks or overloaded systems before they affect users or applications.

How has it helped my organization?

Nagios Core on CentOS has positively impacted my organization by moving our time toward a more advanced and modern monitoring solution, resulting in a better dashboard and tools to view system health in one dashboard and also optimizing alert handling.

What is most valuable?

The best features Nagios Core on CentOS offers are the flexibility to use it for monitoring servers and also using a plugin to check specific services, backup VMs, or other specific checks on my servers, so if there is any error on disk or CPU or high usage of CPU or disk, it helps me have a powerful alerting system and a high level of customization; therefore, the best feature is the flexibility through plugin-based monitoring.

Out of the flexibility, server monitoring, customization, and plugin support, I rely on server monitoring the most in my day-to-day work, and it makes my work easier by providing timely alerts about server status.

What needs improvement?

One area that could be improved in Nagios Core on CentOS is the user interface.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Nagios Core on CentOS for approximately ten years.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for others looking into using Nagios Core on CentOS is to start with a very clear monitoring plan before installing anything; define exactly what you need to monitor, servers, network devices, and what metrics truly matter, as this will reduce noise later and keep the system useful.

Regarding Nagios Core on CentOS's security capabilities, it is generally considered solid because it is based on a simple architecture, core, and plugins, which reduce the attack surface; security is managed through standard Linux hardening, firewalls, limited access, SSL for the web UI, securing the web interface, patching, Nginx authentication, and restricting plugin execution permissions, while also keeping systems patched.

Regarding Nagios Core on CentOS's accuracy and reliability of output, it depends on rule-based checks and plugin configuration rather than intelligence, as Nagios Core on CentOS itself does not have native AI capability.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Last updated: Jun 15, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core on CentOS
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about Nagios Core on CentOS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ramazan Cetinkaya - PeerSpot reviewer
System Software Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Jun 5, 2026
Reliable alerts have protected critical environments but documentation still needs improvement
Pros and Cons
  • "Alerting in Nagios Core on CentOS is instantaneous and more accurate."
  • "Nagios Core on CentOS could use a better UI."

What is our primary use case?

I primarily use Zabbix for monitoring purposes, but Nagios Core on CentOS acts like a safety belt for all the system cloud and on-premise systems.

I have many CentOS applications running, which include Java apps, and for their VM specs, CPU, memory specs, and other operating system alarms, I use Nagios Core on CentOS for all of them.

Nagios Core on CentOS serves as a safety belt because when I lose the entire cloud and also monitoring tools like Zabbix, Nagios Core on CentOS always lets me know that.

For example, when I lose the cloud environment, Zabbix misses that because Zabbix was also on cloud, but Nagios Core on CentOS saved us.

I'm not monitoring Nagios Core on CentOS from Zabbix, but I could also monitor Nagios Core on CentOS from the Zabbix side, though I haven't done that yet.

What is most valuable?

Alerting in Nagios Core on CentOS is instantaneous and more accurate. The accuracy and reliability of Nagios Core on CentOS's output are quite good, and I have always used it on CentOS, so it has been reliable and accurate.

For example, when I lose the cloud environment, Zabbix misses that because Zabbix was also on cloud, but Nagios Core on CentOS saved us.

Handling upgrades and patching for Nagios Core on CentOS is straightforward. I use the upgrade documentation on GitHub, which is simple to handle, and I haven't faced any challenges or errors during upgrading.

I have about 150 endpoints, but even though it is on low spec servers, Nagios Core on CentOS has no lags or slowdowns and is quite fast.

I have only a few critical and important alarms with Nagios Core on CentOS, so I have no cases of false positives.

What needs improvement?

Nagios Core on CentOS could use a better UI.

Documentation for Nagios Core on CentOS can be improved.

The learning curve for new users adopting Nagios Core on CentOS is challenging, primarily due to the limited documentation available on the internet regarding how to install and maintain it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Nagios Core on CentOS for about five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, Nagios Core on CentOS is quite stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I already have many endpoints, but I don't need any scalability because the number of my endpoints is fixed and not increasing.

How are customer service and support?

I have never needed to reach out to customer support for Nagios Core on CentOS.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Nagios Core on CentOS is the first monitoring tool I have installed.

How was the initial setup?

The easy to install feature of Nagios Core on CentOS is very simple.

For example, Zabbix is more complicated on the agent and server side, but on Nagios Core on CentOS, NRPE and Nagios server are much easier to install and maintain for me.

What was our ROI?

Time and money are examples of ROI benefits because when there is a disaster in cloud or on-premise systems, it means loss of money and time. Nagios Core on CentOS lets me know about these issues, and I can recover the system or stop the disaster, saving both money and time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My company is using the open-source version of Nagios Core on CentOS, so there were no pricing, installation, or licensing costs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated Zabbix and also installed it, so I am using multiple monitoring tools: Nagios Core on CentOS and Zabbix.

What other advice do I have?

I am the only user in Nagios Core on CentOS as the admin user, so I have no idea about user access and permissions management.

When I see alarms on Nagios Core on CentOS, those are critical and important ones that would indicate an actual disaster, so Nagios Core on CentOS helps me only with alerting. The rest of the process is system recovery, which won't be straightforward, but Nagios Core on CentOS helps me understand the issue.

My advice to others looking into using Nagios Core on CentOS is that they should use a safety belt approach because using Nagios Core on CentOS as a safety belt in monitoring makes it the best option. I would rate this product a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 5, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Manikandan Kajendran - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Administrator at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Jun 15, 2026
Open source monitoring has supported diverse workloads and now requires ongoing platform changes
Pros and Cons
  • "The best features Nagios Core on CentOS offers is that it is completely open source."
  • "The main concern is that CentOS support has ended and its life cycle has reached its conclusion, which is why we moved over to other operating systems."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Nagios Core on CentOS was monitoring my production environment. We had applications that included Apache and Tomcat applications, as well as databases such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and MariaDB, in addition to system load monitoring.

What is most valuable?

The best features Nagios Core on CentOS offers is that it is completely open source.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Nagios Core on CentOS from my first years onwards. Recently, I migrated from CentOS to Ubuntu and Red Hat.

What other advice do I have?

CentOS support has ended, which forced us to use RHEL as well as Ubuntu. The main concern is that CentOS support has ended and its life cycle has reached its conclusion, which is why we moved over to other operating systems.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 15, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user