LambdaTest Reviews

Having a global user base, we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. Our automated tests for web browsers on the latest versions and mobile browsers, including Android and iOS, required a larger farm of VMs to function smoothly.

LambdaTest helped us with solving this issue, allowing us to run our automated tests on a much larger VM farm.

LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours.

Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

We also use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and the LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us achieve a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that, we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, where all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location.

I also use the LambdaTest Automation insights frequently to analyze trends of the pass/fail rate of our tests, which helps me analyze the suites that are prone to failure and what can be done to eliminate it.

The tool allows me to filter data up to a year and for different test types and users (if that's in your plan), which I found interesting and productive to analyze.

I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool. It would be a good package for Lambdatest!

We have been using LambdaTest for eight months.

We did not use another similar testing solution prior to LambdaTest.

We evaluated Sauce Labs and CrossBrowserTesting.

LambdaTest has helped me gain more customers. I was not aware of how cross-browser compatibility could make a huge difference for my website. Now I have both devices compatible and a responsive website. All thanks to LambdaTest.

I got attracted towards LambdaTest services by reading a review on a website. It made me think — is it really important for my business? Now I am a happy customer of LambdaTest. Their customer support is just amazing, and all my queries relating to the tool gets resolved in a jiffy.

We are continuously using LambdaTest to check every development we do. It is browser compatible and working flawlessly on all browsers.

The unbelievably neat and intuitive user-interface gives me clarity for all my test logs and even helps me save my test so that I do not have to choose them again. 

I did face some minor issues, but after talking with their customer support, they took it as a priority and got it resolved. So I am happy and want to see more features they could add in future.

It's stable, and its performance is good. 

Good.

If you are opting to use LambdaTest, you are in the right direction. You will find much more similar solutions like LambdaTest, but you will not find exactly LambdaTest in other platforms.

Yes, I did use BrowserStack for few months, but it was too costly, and also we are not happy with its kind of performance, so we are looking for an alternative.

It's very straightforward.

In-house.

Superb.

I think it is the cheapest platform in today's market. 

No, after that, we gave a first try to LambdaTest as it seemed quite good, and after giving it a try, we stuck to it. 

Yes, they are doing a great job.

For testing and automation. We do cross browser testing for different versions of subproducts.

We don't use it for mobile app testing. We are planning on using it in the future for that. 

The real devices feature.

Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement. 

I have been using LambdaTest for one year. 

Twenty five users are using at the moment. The scalability is an eight out of ten. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

The pricing could be made cheaper. 

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.