Associate Consultant at Capgemini
Consultant
Top 5
Good automation for large file transfers and independently managed
Pros and Cons
  • "We can send the data quickly and securely."
  • "Setup is time-consuming."

What is our primary use case?

This platform is used as an independently managed file transfer server that supports multiple environments.

Data can be sent securely, and no data loss happens during the transfer. Large files can be sent easily.

We can automate the data transfer based on the event or schedule.

During large file transfers, if the failure happens due to a network/internet issue, in the event of a failed file transfer, we can send the remaining data again from the last byte of data successfully transferred so that there is no need to send all of the data again.

How has it helped my organization?

JSCAPE helped us with data transfers.

We can send the data quickly and securely.

No data will be lost during the transfer.

If any interruption occurs during the transfer, there is no need to send the data again; we can send the data from where it was interrupted.

We can set the automatic file transfer on a scheduled basis or based on other event conditions.

We can create multiple virtual servers, each with its own set of users and permissions.

It performs email-based file transfers while avoiding the issues commonly experienced with large email attachments.

What is most valuable?

I found the triggers feature the most valuable. Using this feature, we can quickly automate the business processes based on events or conditions so that whenever any file is received by vendors/customers, we can automatically compress that file, and then we can forward the compressed file via email to the respective owner for further processing.

There is no need to compress the file manually, as it has an automatic compression feature.

Also, the ad-hoc file transfer features perform email-based file transfers, which avoids issues commonly experienced with large email attachments.

What needs improvement?

In the next release, some additional features could be added:

  • Setup is time-consuming. Also, maintenance is difficult. These could have been made easier. 
  • The upgrade process is a bit difficult.
  • The interface could have been more user-friendly, and more improvements are needed because it is hard to use.
  • More documentation is needed to understand the usage.
  • Server configuration is complex, and settings are difficult to identify.
  • Customer support is good. We get our resolution, but sometimes the response is a bit delayed. 
Buyer's Guide
JSCAPE by Redwood
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about JSCAPE by Redwood. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for one year.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Akshatha Ramesh - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Business Analyst at EFI
User
Top 10
Good automation, no complex coding, and high-level data encryption
Pros and Cons
  • "JSCAPE provides high-level data encryption, which can help us share confidential and time-sensitive data across our global partners without any hassle."
  • "The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial."

What is our primary use case?

As a sales operations analyst, my day-to-day tasks involve collating, managing huge data from Excel files, forecast, building dashboards, and sharing those files with our stakeholders. 

For analysis, we mainly deal with a minimum of ten years of data so the file size will be huge and manually sharing those data and adding security measures to those files was an ongoing challenge for us. 

Data loss and cross-sharing of files without proper security measures was a huge problem facing our organization. After implementing JSCAPE MFT, these tasks have become more convenient.

How has it helped my organization?

JSCAPE is a top-notch file transfer service. It has helped me to negate manual intervention whilst transferring huge files, in turn causing fewer errors and bill data loss.

The main advantage is it aids in achieving all types of transfers as it supports different types of protocols. The transfer of files is made easy by supporting different types of operating systems and database servers. This, in turn, helps us to compress the files automatically without any hassle. It also has an amazing UI that is user-friendly.

What is most valuable?

1. JSCAPE's ability to support all the major protocols like HTTPS, FTPS, SFTP, etc., has made file sharing a process very easy.

2. Its automation feature is noteworthy as files can be transferred in a jiffy.

3. No complex coding or scripts are required while working on file cleaning.

4. It can work on any operating system using the latest encryption technology.

5. JSCAPE provides high-level data encryption, which can help us share confidential and time-sensitive data across our global partners without any hassle.

What needs improvement?

When it comes to performance and scalability, JSCAPE is a highly reliable software, however, I would suggest a few improvements:

1. The documentation needs a revamp for a better understanding of the features of the tool.

2. Customer service can be offered on call or chat.

3. The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial.

4. UI can be improved in terms of look and feel.

5. Documentation should be provided for a majority of newly released features as these can be difficult for a layman to use without proper instructions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using JSCAPE for a year now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The file transfer service is quite stable and definitely has all options required for the comfortable sharing of files.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is doing an acceptable job and has a very high impact across industries.

How are customer service and support?

I've had a positive experience with technical support - although call or chat support would be highly beneficial.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use any different solutions, as we managed everything manually.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was a bit lengthy and confusing.

What about the implementation team?

We were aided by an in-house setup team and they faced difficulty during the initial phase due to lack of documentation.

What was our ROI?

The service helped in saving manual effort and errors due to human intervention.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

JSCAPE comes with decent licensing options which meet all required features.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not get a chance to evaluate any other options as JSCAPE was positively reviewed across websites, so this was our first choice.

What other advice do I have?

JSCAPE as a file-sharing service is offering top-notch services, and I'm sure if they implement a few additional features, it will be a super tool.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
JSCAPE by Redwood
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about JSCAPE by Redwood. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Aishwarya Shekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Technology Analyst at NTT DATA Services
Real User
Top 5
Great high-level encryption, useful database logging features, and good alert capabilities
Pros and Cons
  • "We receive customized email notifications and alerts regarding user activities and the number of login attempts."
  • "The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool."

What is our primary use case?

JSCAPE MFT has got our back in transferring the files very securely using multiple protocols regardless of the time zone/location of the servers. 

We have hundreds of servers operating across many countries, remote connection to these servers, and controlling the activities were a major task and transferring files was difficult.

After implementing JSCAPE MFT these tasks have become more convenient. MFT monitor software provides us an option for load testing on the server which has become very handy to understand the server downtime and failures.

How has it helped my organization?

Our applications are integrated with JSCAPE REST API where the clients can perform various file transfers securely assuring data encryption. 

Administrators can perform server management functions and ensure constant service levels even during heavy system load. 

We receive customized email notifications and alerts regarding user activities and the number of login attempts. This is really helpful as it helps us to solve incidents based on login issues for a user. 

The main advantage of JSCAPE is that it enables users to automate complicated file transfer workflows and business processes which are less prone to errors and boost our productivity.

What is most valuable?

JSCAPE provides high-level data encryption, where we can relax about confidential or sensitive data while transferring. 

The data loss is prevented using DLP engine algorithms. We use directory monitoring so it automatically runs a trigger to move files to another network share every 20 minutes. 

JSCAPE has a database logging feature which is really useful for us to make sure all the servers and API activities are logged and stored in a remote database for future reference. They provide excellent 24/7 support by cooperating whenever we are in need of help.

What needs improvement?

As far as our experience, there are no significant drawbacks to using the JSCAPE MFT server. 

The documentation part can be improved to be more precise for beginners to understand the advanced features of the tool. 

The initial setup and configuration take some time. This process also requires additional video tutorials. 

Also, the UI design can be improved in terms of look and feel. 

When it comes to performance, scalability, and reliability JSCAPE MFT server scores full marks with no doubt. 

I highly recommend this software for all secure file transfer needs in the business process.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using JSCAPE MFT for more than a year.

How are customer service and support?

the customer support is excellent; they provide 24/7 services for all user queries.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use any solution previously.

What was our ROI?

Using JSCAPE MFT we are achieving our SLA targets before they reach deadlines or incur breaches. This has a major impact on profit for our business and clients are happy with our support.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The software holds decent pricing that all kinds of businesses can afford.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

The software is performing really well in the market and is a go-to for automation needs.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Pooja P - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Development Specialist at NTT DATA
Real User
Top 5
Reliable, easy to use, and great for beginners
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers."
  • "With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better."

What is our primary use case?

File Transfer Protocol was time-consuming by using emails, SharePoint, etc, and required a resource to monitor it would have been prone to errors during the transfer/upload of files. 

With JSCAPE file transfer, it has been possible to transfer files at accelerated speed & efficiency. The automation option to schedule the tasks helps reduces the time & the need for regular monitoring. Being the centralized repository helps in avoiding and maintaining several servers & multiple environments. In this way, it has helped to streamline file transfer.

How has it helped my organization?

This has helped to transfer huge files and attachments hassle free which was difficult otherwise even with emails, zipping/compressing, and SharePoint. It addresses various problems in the IT industry being a trustworthy software that secures data transfer and it reduces human-prone errors with its automation & integrated feature. 

It is a reliable and easy-to-operate platform for secure file transfers. Its outstanding features accelerate file transfer and make the process user-friendly plus efficient. Supports scheduling, event-driven/manual triggers, alerts, audits, and logging to streamline file transfer. 

Using accessibility rules the servers could be locked based on IP addresses. Stands out by Centralizing workflow into a single server/application.

What is most valuable?

Their extensive features make work simpler and avoid human-prone errors and complications.

Helps in quick deliverables.

It's reliable and easy to use.

Provides good data privacy and secures data transfers.

It is user-friendly and can be used extensively across organizations.

Large attachments & files could be easily processed with JSCAPE.

 JSCAPE Accelerates File Transfer and thus files could be transferred at high speeds.

The cloud server configuration is simpler.

Centralization helps to avoid and maintain multiple servers.

What needs improvement?

There isn't any specific limitation as it addresses the problems and possesses all the features required for file transfer.

There could be detailed documentation to make it simple and easy for beginners.

 With constant software releases and updates, detailed notifications and documentation on the improvements along with the comparison of the past and present features would be helpful to understand and use it better.

The UI could be simpler and improved as it requires help and guidance from time to time.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Pradeep Kumar Jain K.N. - PeerSpot reviewer
SQL Database Admin at Tata Consultancy
Real User
Simple cloud server configuration, great features, and very fast
Pros and Cons
  • "Triggers are also something that is useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code."
  • "The user interface is something that has to be worked on."

What is our primary use case?

File Transfer Protocol was something that used to take a lot of time and always needed a resource to monitor it as there was a chance for failure in the transfer of files. 

With JSCAPE Accelerated File Transfer Protocol, we can now transfer files at speeds when compared to FTPs. 

It can be used to transmit data securely with third parties, such as partners, clients, or suppliers. Large files like design files, financial information, or medical records can be sent in this manner. File Transfer Protocol was something that used to take a lot of time and always needed a resource to monitor it as there was a chance for failure in the transfer of files.

How has it helped my organization?

Our organization uses multiple platforms, databases, and applications that must be connected to provide seamless file transfers. 

The work of integrating data from many systems, databases, and applications is made simple by the use of the JSCAPE MFT Server. File Transfer Protocol was something that used to take a lot of time and always needed a resource to monitor it as there was a chance for failure in the transfer of files.

With JSCAPE Accelerated File Transfer Protocol, we can now transfer files at impressive speeds when compared to FTPs.

What is most valuable?

There are many features I found very useful. For example, the AFT - Accelerated File Transfer Protocol, where we can transfer files at speed compared to FTPs. 

Triggers are also something that is useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code. 

The cloud server configuration has been made very simple. It also had many complexities with interfaces as we needed to deal with multiple interfaces now, and with JSCAPE, we can have a single interface with a central point of contact. 

With JSCAPE Accelerated File Transfer Protocol, we can now transfer files at speeds when compared to FTPs.

What needs improvement?

The user interface is something that has to be worked on. It is quite difficult to store code configuration.

API usage is a little difficult, and it is limited to a certain extent. 

The database crashes whenever there is an overload. We also found that this was due to the AV of the server. 

Customization of rules is not easy in JSCAPE. The design part is also complicated. 

Some of the newer features are not documented well. 

Database crashing whenever there was overload also found that this was due to the AV of the server

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for one to two years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not previously use a different solution. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is a good product when it comes to setup costs, pricing, and/or licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
RITHIK V GOPAL - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Analyst at Tata Consultancy Service
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Fast, secure, and easy to automate
Pros and Cons
  • "It is easy to transfer large sets of files."
  • "The JSCAPE team could create detailed documents or blogs on how to troubleshoot certain errors that come over in integration with existing environment tools."

What is our primary use case?

Our project is a security monitoring project whose client is the government entity of Japan. We are supposed to handle very confidential files that need to be protected in storage as well as transfer. 

Before the use of JSCAPE, we used to transfer files over mail or upload the files in SharePoint for anyone to access. 

JSCAPE is a faster and very secure file transfer software that was very easy to implement with our existing security tools. 

Using JSCAPE we have automated the file transfer (i.e. critical import files which are transferred on a daily basis at the end of the working day either from the customer to us or vice versa). 

How has it helped my organization?

Being a cybersecurity analyst I believe security should be the priority of each and every file transfer application. JSCAPE is a secured file transfer application that is fast, and efficient, and also lets us automate tasks providing us with a hassle-free environment. 

This has reduced the time that the associates had to manually transfer huge files on a daily basis as well as this is faster than other file-transferring software and since it is automated there is no scope for error. 

Now associates can concentrate on critically more important tasks rather than performing repetitive task on a daily basis. 

What is most valuable?

Being able to transfer huge files that would take a large amount of time to transfer in a few minutes is really an impressive feature. It is easy to transfer large sets of files. 

Another valuable feature is automation. If you are able to automate the file transfer of large files in a secure manner without little to no human intervention that is bliss. Associates don't have to worry about security as JSCAPE supports a variety of protocols that helps in secured file transfer.

What needs improvement?

The integration with our security tools was a hassle when we implemented JSCAPE for secure file transfer. The JSCAPE team could create detailed documents or blogs on how to troubleshoot certain errors that come over in integration with existing environment tools. They could provide a walkthrough of all features in detail as the associates would not be aware of all the features that can be implemented and used to ease the workload. 

JSCAPE team can maybe implement more pre-build integration setups that would help projects with changing business needs. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for less than a year.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Gowtham S - PeerSpot reviewer
Manufacturing Engineer at Asteria
Real User
Top 5
Secure, user-friendly, and offers good authentification
Pros and Cons
  • "It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required."
  • "The initial setup is a bit hectic during the installation."

What is our primary use case?

We are mainly using this software to transfer files fast and smoothly with data protection. Most of our data is confidential.

We are using this software mainly due to the fact that it is versatile, as we can use it for any kind of operating system, and it works pretty well in all conditions.

Since there is no client software to install, licensing and support expenses are greatly decreased. All that your clients need to begin transferring files is a web browser. 

Additionally, users do not need to worry about stringent internal firewall policies when using the integrated web client since most organizations do not limit web-based traffic.

How has it helped my organization?

It definitely improves any organization which buys this software, as there are numerous options provided.

It helped in confidentially transferring files with a vast number of servers available with no external applications required.

It is so user-friendly that even new team members can understand how to use it effectively without making any mistakes.

They have more security access as no one can hack them and take our data. It offers good authentication features.  

What is most valuable?

They have enormous amounts of features built in which makes our life simpler and avoids complications.

This offers very good data protection and proof mechanisms.

It will work in almost every organization, no matter the kind of operating system they use. It works fine in all conditions.

We can transfer files over email while avoiding the problems typically associated with large email attachments.

What needs improvement?

The initial setup is a bit hectic during the installation. 

The documentation could be better. The web viewer could be customized more effectively as customer requirements are different for different organizations that have their unique requirements.

There should have been a self-upgrade option for software whenever required so that every time we do not need to ask a service engineer for it.

The basic problem in every software is that if the price is low, the features on offer are low. 

 The rest all looks good to me 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for over one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is good.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I'd rate the scalability capabilities eight out of ten. 

How are customer service and support?

I have nothing much to say about technical support. They have been good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use a different solution previously.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was a complex process.

What about the implementation team?

We handled the setup in-house.

What was our ROI?

This definitely has the potential to be a profitable software.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Google
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Scholar Trainee at Wipro
Real User
Top 20
Secure, user-friendly, and helpful when migrating files
Pros and Cons
  • "The user-friendly interface has made it easy for fresh users to adopt it."
  • "The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations."

What is our primary use case?

JSCAPE has helped with migrating the files/documents in a secure and reliable manner. We can use multiple protocols across varied regional locations of the servers.

Our project handles hundreds of servers hosted across the US and Asia-Pacific which were communicated via remote control and SSH. Before implementing JSCAPE into our project, we had to manually transfer files which consumed a huge chunk of our time as it was a tedious process, and documentation of these tasks was hectic.

JSCAPE server has helped us to migrate and upload files in a flawless manner.

How has it helped my organization?

JSCAPE helped us to migrate files across different regions with little to zero latency and the speed at which it is migrated is optimum and precise with zero hassles.

Since files contain data that is of utmost importance, this tool has helped us manage the files securely with well-defined protocols such as SSL/FTP, etc.

It is user-friendly and does not require a huge amount of time to set up and the user interface is beginner-friendly. Onboarders swiftly adapted to it and started utilizing it immediately.

What is most valuable?

The user-friendly interface has made it easy for fresh users to adopt it.

Since the tool employs reliable and robust security guidelines, it has reduced our worry about the aspect of leakage of data and has made it reliable.

The range of protocols like STFP and HTTPS/FTP/SSL/TLS is excellent. 

The configuration is relatively simple and the tool can be set up instantly. Companies can start using it to maximize productivity. We have utilized it to transfer files to different regions all around the globe safely.

What needs improvement?

The cost of the tool is relatively high and can pose a problem to medium and small-scale companies who are trying to overcome their on-premise server limitations. The features that are offered do not cover a wide range of operations which in turn hinders the optimum use of the product.

The support team for the product is below average and needs to improve on their aptitude for communication. The technical assistance provided for troubleshooting sessions is time-consuming is often detrimental to the business.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using the product for less than six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Sometimes when an issue arises in the tool it takes time to fix it and can hence be unstable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable as per our business needs.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is below average.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were using Microsoft SharePoint. Using it, we had to manually transfer/upload files.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution with the help of a vendor team, and their level of expertise was appreciated.

What was our ROI?

We have saved a lot of time by implementing JSCAPE to manage our file system.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It may be too costly for the value provided.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user