IQ Bot Reviews

The Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability is one feature I would like to highlight. Whenever we want to create something from the previous documents or images, the OCR feature enables us to do that job easily.

Migrating from the previous version to the current version is a little tricky. We could not find proper documentation or guidelines to help us migrate the bots from the previous version, version 11.3, to the newer version A2019. 

As this kind of documentation is lacking, whoever wants to migrate from the previous version to the newer version will face some difficulties. That's one thing they can improve on as it'll be helpful for the users.

I have been using IQ Bot for almost one year.

IQ Bot is a stable solution. We didn't face any difficulty in terms of implementation or in terms of running the bot. 

IQ Bot is scalable. As we're running it on a cloud, we can achieve whatever volume we want in a matter of minutes.

IQ Bot was quite easy to set up because we had some knowledge using the previous version. The maximum time it'll take for the initial setup is about four hours.

We are the preferred implementation partner for Automation Anywhere. We have a good dedicated account manager. Whenever there are problems, it's solved within one to three days.

There are others like Automation Anywhere offering similar kinds of bots for less. Most of the platforms are the same, and most of the features are the same, but not the licensing cost. That is an area they can rethink and reduce the licensing cost to help most users.

If there were a couple more free features on the platform, it would help users understand it by implementing them before paying for a commercial one.

Because of the higher licensing cost and lack of proper documentation, I would give IQ Bot a seven on a scale from one to ten.

I use it for reading some data from PDFs. I am putting this data into Excel spreadsheets.

I have used IQ Bot in my own installation as well as in the cloud. I have used it as a trial and as a part of a customer IT data center. I use it on a monthly basis.

The detection or extraction of data from the images in PDFs is the feature that I use the most.

It is a good solution in terms of how easily you can administer or manage this tool. It is quite easy to use, and it is powerful in terms of what it can do.

I've used versions 11 and 2019 of this solution. The problem with version 11 is integration. When you are using a conventional bot and you try to use IQ Bot development, you don't have a specific feature for integrating these two pieces or components of Automation Anywhere. I was seeing some issues while trying to, for example, send some PDF to an IQ Bot processor and get a response for that process. So, there is a problem with integrating the conventional task automation and IQ Bot in version 11. In contrast, version 2019 already has the integration feature, and we can easily integrate two components. There are some features that must be there in version 11 but are currently missing.

There is no total control over some features in IQ Bot. Some variables cannot be parametrized when using IQ Bot directly. The AI features that IQ Bot has must be more open to being parameterized by the user. It would be good if Automation Anywhere exposed some parameters so that I can adjust them as a customer. This is an improvement that Automation Anywhere can do.

I would like to see some features related to deep learning in the next releases of IQ Bot. These will be some interesting features to see.

I have been using this solution for approximately six months. 

It is stable.

I didn't do the task of scaling, but I think it is quite good in terms of scalability. You just need to add more nodes to your cluster and configuration, which is quite easy. We have almost 20 users.

The response time can be improved. At times, I created a ticket, but I didn't get a quick response. Time is the key because we need to make some decisions based on that response. The response time is the only issue. When a support agent contacts you, the process of helping you is quite good.

The initial setup is straightforward. For a new bot, in terms of hours, the deployment isn't at all long. I could deploy my bots very quickly. I could do this task in less than an hour.

I would advise others to define the permissions partly in terms of the network. It is a key concern. I would also suggest first reading all the docs to totally understand the task. You could follow the steps to deploy it correctly. 

I would recommend this solution to others. It is quite a good tool.

I would rate IQ Bot an eight out of ten.

We mainly use it for invoicing and other similar things. We use it to extract the data in different kinds of forms. 

The flexibility to deploy based on the different types is the most valuable. We can deploy pieces of the program directly over the fields. We can also directly connect with databases. We can modify it and make different connections with the database.

We are also able to programmably modify the fields and change the presentation and values or evaluate a list of values. We can change the values on the fly.

It is very flexible and very easy to use and learn. It is also very simple.

The way this solution creates invoices can be improved. It is slow. Sometimes, it is also very complicated because you need to apply some kind of filters and effects over the images, which makes it a little bit complicated. They can reduce the complexity to manage the fields or incorporate other features. They can provide an easy way for developers to customize and program fields.

The accuracy of the OCR engine can be improved. It would be great if they can also provide an ICR engine and an option to choose between OCR or ICR.

I have been using IQ Bot for a couple of years. 

It has good stability. 

It is very scalable. In terms of scalability, it is very competitive against Datacap, and it is very close to Datacap. These are the leaders in this field.

I didn't get a chance to interact directly with their technical support. I use our internal support. I need to go through our technical team, and they provide level-one support. If they can't resolve our questions, they directly interact with their technical support.

The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. Deployment of 25 types of forms with an average of two or three variations probably takes around three weeks.

It has an average cost.

I would recommend this solution. It has been very flexible for us, and it is helping us to reach our goals at the moment. 

I would rate IQ Bot a seven out of ten.

We are currently using this solution, and are interested in providing services to our clients in the future.

We are using IQ Bot for the internal finance department. We are dealing with invoices from many different vendors.

The ease that it provides in extracting vendor invoices, without having to configure them, was the reason for which we had gone with a solution.

Feature-wise it's good.

We are working with IQ Bot, but we are not impressed with it. It works well with static documents but not otherwise.

It was challenging to have to do the pre-processing and tax inputting on our own. They didn't have a feature through IQ Bot.

The way you implement the pre-processing needs improvement. In many cases, the invoices that are received have the fax cover page, and with terms and conditions page. We have to input all of the pre-processing. It would be better to have it as a part of this solution, otherwise, every single invoice would be treated as a new document, even if it comes with terms and conditions and a cover page.

They still have a long way to go when dealing with a structured and unstructured environment.

Features are good, but when dealing with pre-existing models such as purchase orders, and invoice,s for example, the capabilities of the solution need improvement. 

I have been working with IQ Bot for approximately one year.

We have not had any issues with stability.

It's a scalable solution. The biggest challenge that we faced was with the configuration.

It's for an internal finance team and we don't have more than five users at this time. 

We have contacted technical support many times. They are very helpful and very responsive in resolving any issues.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We had help from Automation Anywhere which made the implementation easy.

There are cheaper solutions on the market, but it involves more negotiating. 

Typically, everyone starts at a higher price and negotiate to a lower price to compare with other vendors.

The pricing is complicated but I wouldn't say that they are expensive.

If it has to do with a straightforward structured form, this solution works very well. If you are looking at an unstructured environment with a lot of variety there is some instability in terms of ease of use. It may be better with the 2019 version, but it is something that should be considered before they decide to implement this product.

I would rate IQ Bot a seven out of ten.

I use it for invoice documentation.

IQ Bot is a useful and easy-to-use tool. It is powerful in making a running instance. Moreover, its ability to work with Automation Anywhere is also useful and makes it easy to use.

IQ Bot uses an API OCR engine. At times, they can't accommodate some text in Korean. Also, Korean characters are not cognitive at times.

I am a partner with Automation Anywhere, and I use IQ Bot. I have been working with the solution for two years now.

It is a stable solution. For stability, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Owing to our security issue, I must use an on-premises solution. If I need to scale, I add more machines to the on-premise solution. Also, five people use this solution at my workplace. For scalability, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I do have experience with the tech support from Automation Anywhere. I rate the tech support somewhere between eight to nine out of ten.

Positive

The setup is very simple.

Solutions from Automation Anywhere are expensive. I rate it a seven out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is the higher price, and ten is the lower price.

I compared IQ Bot with ABBYY. I feel that IQ Bot has enhanced UX, UI, and web-based tools.

Overall, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

The IQ Bot use cases were mostly, in the realm of intelligent document automation, extracting data from documents.

The solution can be deployed on-premise or in the cloud.

One of our main uses for IQ Bot is in the processing of invoices. We have a customer that receives invoices from their suppliers and needs to validate that they are valid invoices. In order to do this, they check for the purchase order reference on the invoice. If the invoice matches a pending purchase order, the customer then checks for several other factors, such as if the cost center is valid, if the amounts match the quote, if the individual prices match what was agreed, and if the location of delivery is correct. If all of these factors match, the invoice is accepted. If not, the invoice is denied and a reason is provided. With IQ Bot, we are able to automatically read the invoice, understand all of these variables, and make decisions based on them. Without IQ Bot, we would not be able to identify the key information needed to make these decisions.

Training the model is very simple with IQ Bot's technology. It requires providing several examples of the type of document you want to evaluate. IQ Bot already has a built-in taxonomy, which is like a dictionary of elements commonly found in certain types of documents. For example, when evaluating an invoice, you will find elements, such as "total," "item descriptions," and "shipped to." This pre-existing taxonomy greatly speeds up the training process as it provides a starting point and structure, rather than starting from scratch.

The solution could improve by having more domain-specific templates, such as for documents other than invoices or contracts. For example, having templates for IDs or Passports.

I have used IQ Bot within the last 12 months.

The solution has not failed us before.

I rate the stability of IQ Bot a ten out of ten.

We have approximately 20 users using this solution. We expect our customers to use this solution more in the future. As the solution delivers value, the customer will look for more areas to automate.

The solution is robust.

I rate the scalability of IQ Bot a ten out of ten.

I have used the support and once you have the right channels, they are very straightforward.

The initial setup of IQ Bot is straightforward.

The number of people required for the deployment will depend on the scope of the project. For instance, the invoice project used to require six people to review the volume of invoices customers had, but now only two individuals are needed for reviewing and retraining. The remaining staff has been reallocated to other tasks within the department. However, the number of people required will depend on the scale of implementation. Typically, our team consists of three individuals, a consultant who works with the solution hands-on, an architect, and a developer.

We implement this solution for our partners and customers.

Our customers have received a return on investment. It is the easiest return on investment to provide to a customer.

The benefit of using IQ Bot for document-based tasks is that it's easy to measure cost savings. By evaluating the number of documents processed and the time it takes, it's simple to assign a dollar value to each document. This is very attractive as it allows for the automation of tasks that were previously too complex or time-consuming. For example, in the invoice process we worked on with a customer, they needed to validate certain information in the packing list, such as the weight and units of the items being shipped. Before, they were not doing this extra validation because it was too complex and they assumed the importer would get it right. However, with IQ Bot, they were able to automate this validation and save time and money by being proactive instead of reactive. The technology makes it easy to provide a clear ROI.

The price of IQ Bot could improve by being less expensive.

As a provider, my perspective may be biased. However, the pricing is reflective of the complexity and capabilities of the technology. The more complex the extraction needs, the more sense it makes to invest in IQ Bot. The platform, which is integrated with Automation Anywhere, offers added value that sets it apart from other solutions. For companies that need to address both simple and complex situations, the pricing may be reasonable. However, for those only looking for a narrow solution, it may seem expensive. This is usually reflected in our customer base.

My advice to others is for them to test out the solution. Subscribe and practice using it, you'll be amazed at the things you're able to do by yourself.

IQ Bot was the first to tackle the problem of data extraction on documents, and it set the standard for others to follow. While other solutions have since emerged and improved in certain areas, IQ Bot remains the leader in the market. For us, it's a comprehensive and complete solution that has everything we need.

I rate IQ Bot a ten out of ten.

We use IQ Bot to read complex PDF documents and invoices. 

The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the new feature that makes it possible to integrate the platform with Google. We also like having the ability to use Python for validation.

This solution could be improved by making it possible to add handwriting and signatures. 

This is a stable solution. 

Yes, this is a very scalable solution. 

The initial setup for IQ Bot is very easy. The deployment and maintenance of the solution is simple and only requires one person. 

Gustavo:

We don't measure that.

If you make use of only a few bots, this solution is very cheap.

I would advise others to test as many examples or cases as possible that are applicable to their business. They should pay attention to the quality of the images they use in order to get accurate grading from the IVP or from IQ Bot.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We used it with a construction company that was doing manual time sheet entries that had to be given to HR by the end of the day. They would then translate the time sheet data into digital data to process payroll, attendance, and so on. So, we were tasked to get that particular time sheet and then use the IQ Bot solution to automate extraction of data and further processes.

The ability to train itself is a good, valuable feature. It is one of the most stable RPA products at present.

Installation is easy for IQ Bot, and they provide good technical support.

I'm also happy with the pricing.

IQ Bot needs to scale up further because many other industry products that are capable of capturing handwritten information are doing much better. So, it would be better if IQ Bot spent more time on handwritten data extraction.

Some of the features that are currently existing could certainly be enhanced. The ability to define the coordinates on the screen, on the documents that are being scanned, was a little less when we did the proof of concept. These kinds of features could be enhanced a little more. It looks a little rigid at this point in time, but it could be improved.

I've been using it during the last 12 months.

This is the most stable RPA product at the moment.

Automation Anywhere's technical support has been very good.

Implementation of IQ Bot was easy.

The licensing is on a yearly basis, and I am happy with the pricing. 

Compared to UiPath or Blue Prism, IQ Bot is the most stable RPA product at the moment. Automation Anywhere has come a long way.

If someone is straight away looking at IQ Bot as a potential solution, I would suggest that they do a proof of concept and see their ability to scale their particular process. Each and every process, business process, they bring will be different. So, it's good to start with the proof of concept and then scale according to the need.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate IQ Bot at seven.