Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Senior J2EE Developer at DataServe
Real User
Used internally to integrate isolated solutions and manage traffic overload
Pros and Cons
  • "The Aspera feature for high-speed transfer is highly effective."
  • "I believe there is room for improvement in the pricing structure to make it more accessible."

What is our primary use case?

We use IBM Integration Bus with IBM DataPower for IT integration. It’s the most used and essential component. For data security and governance, we use it with HiSphere. It’s also integrated with Outlook for handling video files.

What is most valuable?

The Aspera feature for high-speed transfer is highly effective. For DataPower, we use it to export our servers and integrate with government sectors. It's also used internally to integrate isolated solutions and manage traffic overload.

What needs improvement?

IBM Integration Bus is a reliable solution that helps us handle performance challenges effectively. However, I believe there is room for improvement in the pricing structure to make it more accessible. As far as IBM Integration Bus is considered for other organizations, it has strong performance capabilities and integration features.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM Integration Bus for two years.

Buyer's Guide
IBM Integration Bus
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about IBM Integration Bus. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Integration Bus is quite stable, I would rate it at eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, it's a solid ten. IBM's technical support is good, I'd rate it at an eight.    

How was the initial setup?

The installation was manageable, although it required specific skills in the Open-Sec environment. It took us about two weeks to install and configure everything, depending on the environment complexity and the number of servers. Currently, around thirteen technical users are working with IBM Integration Bus in our organization.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I recommend IBM Integration Bus with a rating of nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Integration Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5
Has good message queue connector features
Pros and Cons
  • "The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have this SQL database connector So those built in connectors are there. For the almost most of the systems, we have built in connectors. And second thing is that it is a stateless Integration, so it doesn't maintain a state of the integration. Bus the Stitches Integration makes it very fast."
  • "The message queue connectors are the most valuable feature. They have built-in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP and Oracle Database."
  • "The password settings need improvement."

What is our primary use case?

I worked with Integration Bus for a UK-based insurance client and banking domain client. Our main use cases are for integrating different systems. We were involved in integrating their master data management domain.

What is most valuable?

The message queue connectors are the most valuable feature. They have built-in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP and Oracle Database.

What needs improvement?

The password settings need improvement. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Integration Bus for five years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is highly stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability is very high. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of the solution is high. 

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate the product a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

IBM
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
IBM Integration Bus
September 2025
Learn what your peers think about IBM Integration Bus. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Younus Ahmed Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Developer at Systems Limited
Real User
A solution that is easy to use and implement

What is our primary use case?

Whenever we want to secure our data, we connect to IBM Integration Bus, and they use that for security.

What is most valuable?

One very good feature is the UI, and it's easy to understand how to implement the tool.

What needs improvement?

The configuration could be improved. If you build an option in the toolkit, such as a health configuration, we should load the command and configure it. We should then just run checks, and the configuration should be completed.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with the solution for almost five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. I rate the solution's stability a five to six out of ten. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a five to six out of ten.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. If the customer requires any API on any server, it should take a maximum of five to six seconds to deploy.

What other advice do I have?

The solution is easy to understand, and it's a good tool for development and security. I rate IBM Integration Bus a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Henok Tsegaye - PeerSpot reviewer
BDM/Chief Information Officer at Afcor PLC
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
A digital payment solution with Cloud Pak for Integration feature
Pros and Cons
  • "The Cloud Pak for Integration is a useful feature."
  • "The solution’s pricing could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for a digital payment system.

What is most valuable?

The Cloud Pak for Integration is a useful feature.

What needs improvement?

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using IBM Integration Bus for five years. We are the solution provider.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The product is scalable. There are four customers using this solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex, but you should have a good understanding of programming. Installation depends on the project. For some projects with a limited interface, it takes two to three months, but for a bigger and complex one, installation can take up to six months.

In banks, it is deployed on both Cloud and On-premise.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is expensive.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
DhivakarSekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Software Engineer at Wolters kluwer
Real User
Secure solution that we use for 600 applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the security."
  • "Sometimes migration takes too long."

What is our primary use case?

We use IBM Integration Bus for 600 applications that we're running.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the security.

What needs improvement?

Sometimes migration takes too long.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for nine years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's very scalable. When you deploy the solution, you have the option to create two different policies.

How are customer service and support?

We haven't needed to use technical support very much. We reached out to IBM about a problem we had with HashMap.

What about the implementation team?

I was the developer consultant.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1721373 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of IT Development at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Allows for omni-channel integration, but the setup is complex, technical support is subpar and there is a need for greater resources
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution addresses all of our middleware needs in respect of transformation, parsing, security and stability; everything really."
  • "The solution is complex and there is a need for more resources and greatly improved quality."

What is our primary use case?

We use IBM Integration Bus as a bank middleware solution. 

How has it helped my organization?

The solution does omnichannel integration with the core banking and other systems, including core banking, ETC, and click systems. It does so for a host of systems. 

What is most valuable?

The solution addresses all of our middleware needs in respect of transformation, parsing, security and stability; everything really. 

What needs improvement?

IBM Integration Bus could have better REST API, which could be more powerful,  and this accounts for why we are looking for alternative solutions concerning this and open banking. 

The initial setup was complex. 

Technical support is below what I would consider to be very good. It's good, but not too much or very much so.

The solution is complex and there is a need for more resources and greatly improved quality. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution addresses our stability needs. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Thus far, we have been making maximum use of the solution. 

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is below what I would consider to be very good. It's good, but not too much or very much so.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used a local solution and replaced this with a new enterprise solution. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was complex. 

Including preparation time, addressing the environment and building the POC, deployment took around one month. We are talking about active, on-premises deployment. 

What about the implementation team?

There are nearly five people required for deployment and maintenance. 

What was our ROI?

Management would be in a position to address whether we have seen a return on our investment. This said, we have witnessed some returns on our business so far. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I prefer not to address the licensing costs, or any other for that matter, as this is confidential. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did evaluate other products before going with IBM Integration Bus. 

What other advice do I have?

We are customers of the vendor.

From a development perspective, there are nearly 40 people using this solution in our organization, although we have thousands of customers who do so indirectly. 

The solution probably covers more than 95 percent of the integration requirements. 

I rate IBM Integration Bus as a seven out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Specialust at Infotrellis
Real User
Has a lot of connectors, easy to install, and trusted by many of our clients
Pros and Cons
  • "I found all features valuable. There are a lot of connectors."
  • "Its documentation is currently lacking. We have different environments where we use our configuration services, but we are not able to find documentation about how to deploy the local code to the server and how to set it up on a server level. I would like more documents from IBM that explain which variables should be in your machine while building a project, and when you deploy the code into the server, what should be their values. There are some variable values. I could not find such documentation. While working on a project, I developed the code on a local machine, and while deploying the code to our test environment, I made a couple of mistakes. We had to change some values at the server level, but we couldn't find any documentation regarding this, which made the task difficult."

What is most valuable?

I found all features valuable. There are a lot of connectors. 

What needs improvement?

Its documentation is currently lacking. We have different environments where we use our configuration services, but we are not able to find documentation about how to deploy the local code to the server and how to set it up on a server level. I would like more documents from IBM that explain which variables should be in your machine while building a project, and when you deploy the code into the server, what should be their values. There are some variable values. I could not find such documentation. While working on a project, I developed the code on a local machine, and while deploying the code to our test environment, I made a couple of mistakes. We had to change some values at the server level, but we couldn't find any documentation regarding this, which made the task difficult.

Everyone is moving to the cloud. There is Bluemix from IBM. There should be more connectors that can connect with cloud systems.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with this solution for seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is scalable. Our customers are in the medium range.

How are customer service and support?

I never interacted with IBM's technical support for IIB. I haven't raised any tickets so far.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I also work with MuleSoft. Comparing IIB to MuleSoft, IIB is always used by big companies because it is a licensed solution, whereas MuleSoft is open source. So, small organizations use MuleSoft. Our clients in the USA, Canada, and Dubai preferred IIB over MuleSoft because they have more belief in IBM products, and they feel more secure and safe while using it.

How was the initial setup?

Its installation is easy.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate it an eight out of 10. It is a good product. A lot of new products have come into the market, such as Tibco, MuleSoft, but this product still exists, and clients do believe in this product.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1696329 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Good for large enterprises with relatively mature practices
Pros and Cons
  • "I recommend it for large enterprises but only for specific use cases. You need to have a relatively mature integration practice in your organization to leverage its capabilities fully."
  • "IBM Integration Bus could be easier to manage, but this is true of all vendors. It doesn't always do what it says on the box."

What is our primary use case?

My only client at the moment is a national government bank. Currently, the IBM Integration Bus is the integration platform for all the various departments of the bank. There are probably six or seven major departments across the bank that subscribe to or use the integration services like MessageQ, Broker, or the platform's orchestration capabilities. And we have a team of about 15 people managing it.  

Integration Bus has also been put in place to lay the foundation for hybrid integration into the two specific systems on the cloud. We are still deploying it, so we haven't gotten into any actual use cases yet. In the past, it was relatively easy for the team, but I don't think they've ever leveraged the suite's full capabilities. It hasn't been easy in some instances because the reserve bank is unique. It's not the same as other financial institutions, but we've had challenges on the platform before.

What needs improvement?

IBM Integration Bus could be easier to manage, but this is true of all vendors. It doesn't always do what it says on the box. In terms of new features, we have a roadmap, and it's looking quite comprehensive. However, we may not necessarily need everything they're putting out. I know that's probably driven by global demand. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been dealing with IBM Integration Bus off and on for the last 15 years.

How are customer service and support?

I think IBM support could be faster. It took us a while to resolve our issues because they don't necessarily have the technical resources in our country. We had to source the resources internationally, so it took a while to get that done. But once we got what we needed, IBM resolved it relatively quickly.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up IBM Integration Bus wasn't simple, but we've got a unique environment. We're probably about two or three months behind on our implementation because of unforeseen interoperability problems between Red Hat OpenShift and VMware. We've got a team of about 15 overseeing the deployment, including engineers, developers, and the support staff for the platform.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think our enterprise license agreement is included with a bundle of products.

What other advice do I have?

I would give IBM Integration Bus a solid eight out of 10. I recommend it for large enterprises but only for specific use cases. You need to have a relatively mature integration practice in your organization to leverage its capabilities fully. So I wouldn't recommend it to startups or somebody new. I'd instead go open source or something relatively easy.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM Integration Bus Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free IBM Integration Bus Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.