The solution is quite stable.
It's very scalable.
The solution is easy to manage and update.
The solution is quite stable.
It's very scalable.
The solution is easy to manage and update.
As long as they keep getting the new Compute generations, it would be ideal. Generation 10 was the last that they wanted to support on Blade Enclosure. That's unfortunate though. It may be coming to its end of life. Other than that, I don't have anything else to improve upon.
It's a stable product. There are no bugs or glitches. It cannot crash or freeze. It's reliable.
The solution can scale well.
We've used the BladeSystem and Synergy. The Blade is simpler. The Blade Enclosure C7000 does the same job. It has the same robust fault tolerance and redundancy. Yet at the same time, it's simpler to deal with, to work with.
They have to either simplify Synergy Frame as they will not likely keep going with the Blade Enclosure for a long time. They were still working on it two years ago when I spoke to them. They said, "for at least 10 more years, Blade Enclosure will keep going." That's what they told us. However, for some reason, we wanted to go to the Synergy Frame. It was the wrong decision.
For the very long term, they either have to modify the Synergy to make it more like a C7000 or they might have to rethink keeping and further developing C7000. That's my simple experience.
With HPE Synergy, I had a very painful experience with updating by just really shutting down and rebooting the environment. We had a power outage, and a few things didn't come up properly. Also, when we did the firmware upgrade, there were a lot of problems. It's not as easy as the Blade Enclosure. Usually, I need to open a support ticket with HPE to get around the problems when it comes to Synergy. However, with the Blade Enclosure, it is easier to deal with things.
It's very easy to maintain and to keep updating.
I can't speak to the licensing. I don't get involved in the cost.
I'd rate the product nine out of ten. I've been quite pleased with it.
These are rack servers.
We have data for banking services. We use Windows servers, mostly. We install applications and banking applications mostly, otherwise like some E-discovery services servers are there. We have almost 25 servers. Some of them are in a data center, and some of them are in-house.
We can enhance the processors and increase the RAM. It's easy to do. It's very easy to upgrade.
The solution is issue-free and works almost flawlessly.
It's simple to set up if you have some experience with the product.
The solution is very stable.
It is scalable.
If you've never used the solution before, the initial setup can be complex.
The pricing is high. If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high. At this point in time, we are looking for some servers and when we have compared the prices we found Lenovo is the lowest option, even though they have about the same level of services.
We'd like them to be more scalable.
I'd like to be able to implement a single test system.
I've used the solution for a few years.
It's a stable, reliable solution. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good.
They can scale if it is required.
We have more than 1,000 users on the solution right now.
Technical support is good. They are helpful and responsive.
Positive
Depending on your knowledge, the solution can be very easy or a bit complex to set up.
These are rack servers, so most of the time goes into acquiring them. Once you order them, it takes around four to eight weeks to get them. Once you get those servers, they can be deployed in a week or five days' time.
How many people you need for maintenance depends upon the technical guys as well as the applications themselves. If you're maintaining, then you just need two or three guys. However, it would take more resources if you talk about connectivity and application maintenance and other parts. It also depends upon the number of servers we have installed.
The cost of the solution is high. There are other cheaper options.
There is no licensing. You pay for the solution once.
We are currently comparing the solution to Lenovo.
We use it in-house and in a data center.
They need to make the product more scalable and price-efficient.
I'd recommend the solution to others.
I would rate the solution seven out of ten. It needs to be a bit less expensive.
The interface and dashboard are excellent and user-friendly. Configuration is also straightforward and similar to installing Windows.
There are limitations in writing exploiter features because of the sanctions.
Because we use this solution in Iran, I am unsure about the rules in Iran. Because Iran is a sanctioned country, we don't access any features and must use a program for our routine. We don't have access to add to anything in the HPE.
We would like to see OneView software features as an additional feature. It would be great for IT technicians, IT specialists and IT assistants.
We have been using HPE BladeSystem for two years. Is it a software system, we have many servers, and we use them daily for our banking, infrastructure, and government customers. It is deployed on cloud. Last month we switched our cloud, and we route the solution to connect Synergy Server and cloud services.
It is a stable solution.
The solution is scalable.
There are limitations to the technical support due to the sanctions in Iran. The HPE services have very good documentation, but we can't use it. We can't use this documentation without a VPN or proxy. In government organizations, we don't have any VPN or proxy, and support is very important.
The setup and installation were easy.
I rate this solution a ten out of ten.
We primarily use the solution for our SQL Server VMware virtualization. We put this on our on SQL Servers and VMware virtualization systems on this product.
The solution uses a smaller space in our data centers. It uses less feeder and network cable, which reduces costs. Troubleshooting is also easier than other options.
The solution saves us space and resources (like cables).
It's very easy to troubleshoot if we have issues.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward.
The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved.
It's a bit expensive. They should work on bringing down the pricing if they can.
We have one older model, we've used for maybe six or seven years. We also have a new one, which is Synergy, we've used for two years.
The solution is stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It's free of quirks and it doesn't crash or freeze.
The scalability is good. If a company needs to expand it out, they should be able to do so.
Our company has over 5,000 users on this solution.
We will continue to use the solution into the future.
The technical support is okay, I'd rate it seven out of ten overall. Their response times could be faster.
We didn't switch from a different solution. We had older models which we updated. We've always used HPE.
The initial implementation is not complex. It's a pretty straightforward process.
We deployed the solution over 100 servers, and it didn't take too long to deploy.
We have about ten to 20 people managing the solution.
We had a vendor assist us with the implementation.
I don't know the exact cost of licensing, however, it's my understanding that the solution is relatively expensive.
We're simply a customer. We don't have a business relationship with HPE.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using or if it's the latest.
I'd recommend the solution to other companies.
On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate it at an eight. If the pricing was better and they offered better support, I would rate the solution higher.
I'm very happy with the product in general.
I'm an engineer in different environments, I have seen HPE frequently; HPE support packs, et cetera. In terms of the hardware versions update, it's giving me very good support compared to other products.
It is a stable product.
The scalability has been good.
Technical support is helpful.
I'd like to see an all-in-one packet in the future. Some solutions don't come with storage.
During deployment, they're providing different places for the .EXE files and whatever it is downloading. It would sometimes mess up. This could be adjusted so that it's easier to deploy without issue.
I've used the solution for the past 15 years. It's been well over a decade now. I've used it for quite a while.
We are satisfied with the stability. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.
The solution can scale. It is a bit limited, however.
The support has been very good and we are extremely satisfied with them.
Aside from some issues around .EXE files not downloading properly, the initial setup is pretty straightforward.
In terms of deployment times, each blade hardly takes one or two hours to set up. It might take one or two days in total based on the already gathered requirements and whatever the company made already.
You only need about two people to deploy and maintain the solution. Once it's deployed completely, likely you only need one person to maintain everything.
Vendors will come and they configure mostly hardware side. The remaining part, networking, et cetera, we configure, and everything is fine. Our clients mostly deployed it in-house. We come in to configure the WLANs and remaining stuff.
The licensing is paid on a yearly basis.
I have recommended my clients to HPE. Rather than other companies, HPE would give good support, and I'm very happy with that. It is a good, high-end product.
I'm not completely an end-user. I'm like an administrator, in the server administration department.
The solution is more suited to the cloud in terms of deployment options.
I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We are using HPE for the virtualization. All machines are virtualized, and we are using them in the clusters. They are highly available and set up on the default ones as well. For the DMZ, we use regular rack servers. Those are separate clusters.
The solution is very easy to use.
We find the product to be very stable.
The scalability is great.
Technical support is okay.
These particular blades are no longer being produced. If they produced more or offered support for them I would be interested in getting more.
It would be ideal if they had been offered at a lower price point. If they bring them back, I'd buy them at a lower price point.
The support you get is dependant on the region. Some regions are better than others.
I have been here, in this company, for more than four years. We have been using the product since I have been here, so it's likely been more than five years that the company itself has used the product.
The stability of the product is very reliable. The performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
The solution can scale well. It's not a problem if a company wants to expand it.
We have thousands of people that use it.
I've been in touch with technical support in the past. The level of service you receive depends on the region. We have two data centers, one in Frankfurt and one in Paris. When we were assigned to the Frankfurt team, they are okay, however, the local French team left us a bit unsatisfied.
Mainly we are using blade servers from different vendors. We have Cisco UCS, HPE blade servers, and Lenovo blade servers on the global team.
In previous companies, I used HPE and the Cisco blade servers as well - the Cisco UCS servers. In one other company, I used Dell servers as well.
It's my understanding that the initial setup is very straightforward and simple. However, I was not directly involved with the initial setup. It was two or three years ago.
I'm not sure exactly how long the deployment process takes.
We have five or six people on staff that can handle deployment and maintenance tasks. They are all engineers and one is a team leader.
The price of the product was a bit on the high side.
You do have to pay for the hardware and a yearly licensing fee.
I'm a customer and an end-user.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with its capabilities.
I would recommend it to others.
We have a mix of generation eight and ten Blades in our HPE BladeSystem and we mostly use the system for virtualization.
One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily.
We sometimes have compatibility issues depending on the browser that you are using. For example, sometimes you have to switch between Edge, Mozilla, Internet Explorer, or Chrome to have things operating correctly.
We have a few Blades from previous generations that cannot have the updated firmware upload to them unless you have a maintenance contract with HP. This is a frustrating problem we have experienced with the support.
I have been using this solution for approximately eight years.
The solution has had a few bugs and glitches.
The solution is scalable, we have approximately 3,000 people that use this solution.
When we received technical support from HPE and it has been very good.
I would rate the technical support for HPE BladeSystem a ten out of ten.
The installation was very easy.
We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support.
We are currently evaluating and researching other options because we are looking for simplicity. We plan to replace our HPE BladeSystem with converged or hyper-converged infrastructure.
I would advise others this is a good system overall with great hardware.
I rate HPE BladeSystem an eight out of ten.
We use HPE BladeSystem as an internal cloud.
HPE BladeSystem makes it much easier since it's been there. We can set up the hardware once and just provision what we need from that.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the ease of management with the hardware.
We are very pleased with using this solution.
We are very happy with what we have, but HPE is not going to continue with BladeSystem. It will be discontinued so we will have to change to another product shortly.
I have been using HPE BladeSystem for approximately seven years.
We use the BL460 series and the version is C7000. We have a mix of Gen9 and Gen10 servers.
Stability-wise, it's been very good for us.
We have had very few issues with it, hardware-wise, and even very few software issues with it.
Overall, the HPE BladeSystem has been very stable for us.
For our purposes, it has worked exactly the way we expected it to.
It has been very scalable for us. We have been able to add additional servers, add additional C7000 chassis, and it just continues to work. It has been very scalable and worked very well.
We have two C7000s, and a total of 17 blade servers. Most of the servers have the attached storage blade for increased storage, besides what's in the blade itself.
Our initial implementation included a couple of NAS units, but they were very slow, which is why we went with the storage blade units. That gave us better performance.
We have upgraded to some newer NAS units from HPE, and they've worked very well for us, which is why we are starting to slowly shift in that direction. That may change now since we're going to have to go with a new platform the next time we do an upgrade.
I have contacted technical support once or twice, and it was very good.
We were very pleased with the support that we received.
We went from individual servers, or individual racking at servers, to the blade system.
The initial setup was different than anything we had done before. It was a little bit complex to get initially set up. But, once it was set up, the ongoing management has been fairly easy.
If I had to do it again, it would be very easy to do, now that we're familiar with it.
We rolled it out over time. We modified our implementation a little bit as we went along, as we discovered different features and different capabilities.
I maintain the solution. It only requires one person.
I am not familiar with the pricing.
We will be evaluating other solutions since we discovered that they are not going to be making the BladeSystem anymore.
We have had good luck with them, and good success with them.
We haven't had any issues that are major issues. We have been very pleased with it.
I would rate HPE BladeSystem a nine out of ten.
