Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Reviews

It's a lock storage correlation device. You can connect locks from different devices. Not just from Fortinet, but you can send locks from other devices to FortiAnalyzer. Basically, it is a centralized repository.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer has a lock correlation feature. It simplifies the troubleshooting process for its customers. So now, instead of logging into every firewall, they can log into Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and check the locks. They can also check whether there are any issues with the network.

This is a difficult question for me to answer. I want the tool to have a sophisticated and customizable dashboard similar to the one in the SIEM solution. However, I'm not sure if that is in the pipeline. Basically, I would say that it's not a pure SIEM solution where your customer can have a layer on a view of dashboards or advanced dashboards.

I work with Fortinet and Palo Alto. I am also a partner of Fortinet. Even though I have been working with Fortinet for more than five or six years now, Fortinet EDR is something very new for me and us in general. We have been working on firewalls, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiMail, FortiADC, and FortiWeb. EDR, SDMA, and ZTNA are new to us. Speaking about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, I have been working on it for more than six years now.

The stability of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is okay. Although some customers have encountered issues, others have had a pretty okay experience and are doing pretty well with the solution.

I would say that more than ten of our clients are working on this solution. I would say that it is kind of scalable since it comes in different form factors. Owing to the different form factors and sizing of the solution, you can add and get increased capacity. This can help a person to add more firewalls and devices.

I would say that Fortinet's tech support is really good.

Neutral

I can say that the setup is a mixture of both options. I wouldn't say it is difficult. I would rather say that the setup process is okay or moderate. Also, the straightforwardness and complexity of the setup process will depend on your environment.

The deployment of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is not complex, but integrating it with firewalls can take some time, depending on the number of firewalls. So, the deployment of the entire solution can take approximately one week to complete.

I'm not familiar with the cost point, because I am more of a technical person and I do not do pre-sales or sales.

I downloaded reports for CrowdStrike Falcon and FortiEDR from peerspot.com to see how they are in terms of performance.

Based on current trends, people are shifting towards FortiGate devices for their attractive value proposition and exceptional performance. FortiGate is the go-to choice for firewalls. And for us, along with FortiGate, I'll even go with FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer. I rate this solution a seven out of ten.

The product is for reporting about the use or detecting some issues or activities.

The ability to track the activities of our users and some topics about security risks are the most valuable aspects.

It's simple to use.

It is not hard to set up.

The configuration is easy.

It offers good integration capabilities.

Support is helpful.

There is a lot of great documentation to be found online. 

We are concerned about the compliance of our policy and institutional philosophy. We are a university and provide the tool to the users and to the infrastructure for the right use.

I've been using the solution for six years. 

We have around 2,000 users.

Support is good. We also use the documentation online and find help via some tutorials on the internet.

The initial setup is very simple. 

The deployment took about six months. 

We deployed it via our team, however, we used an external consultant from the reseller.

We pay a standard licensing fee on a yearly basis. 

The pricing is complex since we need to add some other products or tools to assure our infrastructure, then the amount of every one of the items of software otherwise the solution is expensive in the end.

We are a customer and end-user.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use this solution to centralize the monitoring on Forti Fabrics. We monitor all firewalls and use this solution for incident management.

This solution offers one view of incident management which has been the most valuable feature. 

When using this solution, you need a high-level expert to make it work as it should. We hired IT support who had knowledge of the network and firewall. For the initial step, you need a Forti expert. 

We have used this solution for one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

We have a support expert who contacts Forti when we have a problem. If we come across a bug, we need to involve Forti and open a ticket for support.

We hired a consultant to complete the setup as it is not straightforward and requires an expert. The setup took a few days. Four IT staff look after maintenance of this solution.

The enterprise version of this solution is costly. We have considered FortiAuthenticator for network control, but the pricing was focused on the larger companies and didn't suit our needs as a smaller business.

The pricing for this solution is on an annual basis. Databases, a virus scanner, and intrusion detection is included.

We have previously looked into Sophos UTM and Palo Alto.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

We use FortiAnalyzer as our indicator of compromise solution, and I'm also running some SOC into it. 

FortiAnalyzer's reporting features like graphs, threat intelligence, and vulnerabilities analysis are helpful. Fortinet knows how to do reporting. You can customize your reports to show exactly what you want to analyze. It's user-friendly and doesn't require a lot of effort. 

The hub is another feature that's good to use. FortiAnalyzer can be connected to other Fortinet devices via the hub. It isn't restricted, and it's all controlled by FortiManager. It can also integrate all the opcodes to one box. 

If Fortinet could introduce some firewalling or maybe FortiAnalyzer on the cloud, that would be interesting because I've never seen it on a cloud. 

We've been using FortiAnalyzer since 2015. 

FortiAnalyzer is stable. It will do the work as long as your FortiGate is stable. It depends more on the FortiGate, so if your FortiGate is cool, there's no problem. If there is a problem, you can bypass it most of the time. I can't say that there are no issues. I don't want to lie.

FortiAnalyzer is scalable. It can even take over traffic from other analyzers. You can connect as many analyzers as you want to it. 

I used a McAfee SIEM solution before at my previous employer, but it's not as powerful as FortiAnalyzer. I used a Rapid7 solution and Cisco FirePOWER, which are both weak.

We don't need to do much to install FortiAnalyzer because it always depends on FortiGate. You need to deploy FortiGate before you install it. That's why I say that I see it as a dummy box. I don't see anything interesting in it. It's only a support structure.

I rate FortiAnalyzer seven out of 10. It's a very user-friendly box. You don't even need to know the CLI. It has a CLI, but you don't need to know it because the GUI is excellent. It's always doing its duty to keep up with the reporting. 

Our clients use Fortinet FortiAnalyzer to analyze and locate the traffic in their network. Since it's a big customer, they have both Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Fortinet FortiManager.

With Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, it is easy to get reports and read specific logs. It provides fast log analysis for getting information. The solution helps locate if a destination is blocked or a machine communicates with the right port or server. Basic debugging can be done quickly using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer.

Fortinet has a new bug every month, which needs to be improved.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for four years.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is a really stable solution and does not have any bugs.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is a scalable solution.

I have previously used the Kibana tool.

The solution's initial setup is easy because it's a virtual machine. You have to upgrade it once every two to three years, which is a slow process. However, there aren't many features that need to be updated because the product is good.

The solution has been in our organization before I joined. Based on that, I have to say it's a good investment.

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is quite an expensive tool.

On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.

Users should never upgrade to the newest firmware. In the last decade, we have learned to always wait and see. Fortinet has had some bad releases. You must have good quality assurance that the product is bug-free. It is easy to maintain the solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The primary use case for our clients revolves around robust reporting capabilities, addressing key aspects such as understanding diverse utilizations and the performance of network links. They specifically sought insights into bandwidth usage and detailed reporting at the application level. Additionally, an essential requirement was efficient log management. This is crucial because FortiGate has limitations on retaining logs for an extended duration, and our clients needed a solution, such as FortiAnalyzer, to effectively manage and analyze logs over an extended period.

The most valuable is its robust and comprehensive reporting functionality, providing a thorough overview of various metrics. Additionally, its ability to centrally capture logs from multiple devices proves indispensable for our SOC. This centralized log management facilitates automation processes, and we also greatly appreciate the effectiveness of its analytics features.

I believe that its technical support is the only aspect that requires significant improvement. With the current trend toward AI advancements, there's an opportunity for improved AI analytics. This could empower us to better leverage technology to detect attacks in a more effective manner.

I have been working with it for more than five years.

It offers excellent stability capabilities. I would rate it nine out of ten.

It offers a capacity of up to two thousand gigabytes of logs daily, showcasing considerable scalability. I believe it is a scalable solution that can easily accommodate increasing needs without compromising performance. Our clients fall into the enterprise category. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The support services are often outsourced to specific regions, resulting in varying levels of technical expertise. While regions like America, the USA, Europe, and certain countries in Australia benefit from reasonable and proficient engineers, other locations may experience subpar tech support. Consequently, issue resolution can be time-consuming, leading customers to sometimes address problems independently. Particularly in terms of time efficiency, there is a need for improvement to expedite the support process. I would rate it six out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The deployment process is straightforward and efficient, requiring minimal time and effort. It takes approximately thirty minutes and it's quite user-friendly.

The pricing is reasonable. The cost structure is primarily based on factors such as the number of logs, log sizes, and the daily log storage capacity, with a minimum requirement of two gigabytes per day. The maximum storage capacity can extend up to eight thousand gigabytes of logs per day.

I would strongly recommend utilizing it. It's an excellent product with abundant features, offered at a very reasonable price point. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a firewall and security gateway.

It is easy to configure.

The end-user finds it very easy to understand. 

It's stable and reliable.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup is easy, and the deployment is fast. 

Technical support is generally helpful. 

I'm not sure if any features need improvement. 

They could improve the user interface a bit. The GUI could be easier to understand.

I've used the solution for four years. 

The solution is very stable. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten in terms of reliability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It's a very scalable solution. I'd rate the ability to extend ten out of ten. It's excellent. 

We work with mostly small and medium companies. 

I haven't been directly involved with support. However, I have an understanding that they are very good. I haven't heard of any complaints. 

Positive

I'm also familiar with Check Point. I prefer Fortinet products. 

The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the ease of setup eight out of ten. It is quite simple. 

Deployment only takes about one week. We can handle the customer's various policies and configurations. 

It only takes one person to deploy and maintain the solution. It's easy to manage the product. The customer can self-learn the solution and manage it once it is launched. 

It is a fairly affordable solution. I'd rate the solution three or four out of ten with ten being the most expensive. It's cheap It's not costly.  

We mostly resell the solution to big and small customers. 

We're using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd recommend Fortigate products to users in general. 

I would rate the solution ten out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution as an analysis tool. 

We can look at all of the logs in one place. It helps with analysis. It's useful for centralization. We're able to collect all of the logs via the analyzer.

Overall, it's a useful tool. 

The cost is very low. It's one of the reasons I am using it. 

There are a lot of monitoring features available. 

It is easy to set up. 

You have to play a lot with it in order to find what you need and how to use it. 

It is not easy to use.

We were trying to monitor more problems via FortiAnalyzer, however, it was not very good.

We haven't received much help from the team. They haven't tried to make it better or more user-friendly. 

They need to make the monitor better.

They really need to focus on security issues. Every manager is most concerned with this and that must be at the forefront of future designs. 

I've been using the solution for three or four years. 

It is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The scalability is okay. I'd rate it between five and seven out of ten. 

We have 2,000 users on the solution right now. 

The technical support is good overall. 

Neutral

I did not use a similar product previously. 

The solution is very simple to set up. It is very easy to connect all other Fortinet products to this solution. 

The pricing is reasonable. I'd rate the affordability four out of ten, where ten is the most expensive.

I'd rate the solution five out of ten overall. It's an okay product that needs to be easier to use.