I utilize Fortinet FortiAnalyzer to gather various logs from FortiGate, enabling me to conduct specific investigations in particular cases.
Team Lead Manager at Wizlynx
We can collect all gateway information and logs in one location, but it is difficult to modify rules
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to gather all gateway information and logs in a single location is the most valuable feature."
- "I don't find Fortinet FortiAnalyzer to be as robust as Check Point Security Management."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The ability to gather all gateway information and logs in a single location is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement?
I don't find Fortinet FortiAnalyzer to be as robust as Check Point Security Management. However, this perception might be attributed to my limited familiarity with Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. For instance, with Check Point, I can easily make modifications to rules such as identifying issues, making corrections, or adding new features. This includes creating exceptions or adding elements to the current rule set.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for four months.
Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
October 2025

Learn what your peers think about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In our current environment, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I am currently utilizing the cloud version of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, and the scalability it offers is exceptional. Unlike the on-premises version, I have not encountered any issues.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment takes a few minutes and the configuration is easy.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would rate FortiAnalyzer's price a seven out of ten, with ten being the most expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Fortinet FortiAnalyzer a seven out of ten.
We are paying for vendor maintenance support, and so far, the maintenance has been minimal.
I recommend completing training before utilizing Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. I was suddenly tasked with using the solution when my organization decided to change technologies, and it was initially challenging to understand how it operates.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Solutions Architect at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Easy to configure and understand with helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is easy, and the deployment is fast."
- "They could improve the user interface a bit."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution as a firewall and security gateway.
What is most valuable?
It is easy to configure.
The end-user finds it very easy to understand.
It's stable and reliable.
The solution is scalable.
The initial setup is easy, and the deployment is fast.
Technical support is generally helpful.
What needs improvement?
I'm not sure if any features need improvement.
They could improve the user interface a bit. The GUI could be easier to understand.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten in terms of reliability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's a very scalable solution. I'd rate the ability to extend ten out of ten. It's excellent.
We work with mostly small and medium companies.
How are customer service and support?
I haven't been directly involved with support. However, I have an understanding that they are very good. I haven't heard of any complaints.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I'm also familiar with Check Point. I prefer Fortinet products.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. I'd rate the ease of setup eight out of ten. It is quite simple.
Deployment only takes about one week. We can handle the customer's various policies and configurations.
It only takes one person to deploy and maintain the solution. It's easy to manage the product. The customer can self-learn the solution and manage it once it is launched.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is a fairly affordable solution. I'd rate the solution three or four out of ten with ten being the most expensive. It's cheap It's not costly.
What other advice do I have?
We mostly resell the solution to big and small customers.
We're using the latest version of the solution.
I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd recommend Fortigate products to users in general.
I would rate the solution ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
October 2025

Learn what your peers think about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2025.
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
solution architect at a non-profit with 51-200 employees
Low cost and easy to set up, but needs to be easier to use
Pros and Cons
- "There are a lot of monitoring features available."
- "They need to make the monitor better."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution as an analysis tool.
What is most valuable?
We can look at all of the logs in one place. It helps with analysis. It's useful for centralization. We're able to collect all of the logs via the analyzer.
Overall, it's a useful tool.
The cost is very low. It's one of the reasons I am using it.
There are a lot of monitoring features available.
It is easy to set up.
What needs improvement?
You have to play a lot with it in order to find what you need and how to use it.
It is not easy to use.
We were trying to monitor more problems via FortiAnalyzer, however, it was not very good.
We haven't received much help from the team. They haven't tried to make it better or more user-friendly.
They need to make the monitor better.
They really need to focus on security issues. Every manager is most concerned with this and that must be at the forefront of future designs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three or four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is okay. I'd rate it between five and seven out of ten.
We have 2,000 users on the solution right now.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good overall.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not use a similar product previously.
How was the initial setup?
The solution is very simple to set up. It is very easy to connect all other Fortinet products to this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is reasonable. I'd rate the affordability four out of ten, where ten is the most expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I'd rate the solution five out of ten overall. It's an okay product that needs to be easier to use.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Network Architect at NTT Global Networks Incorporated
Stable, but the initial setup is complex
Pros and Cons
- "The analyzer is the most valuable feature."
- "The deployment is complex and has room for improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution for log analysis.
What is most valuable?
The analyzer is the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement?
The deployment is complex and has room for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex. The deployment took a few hours.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was completed with an integrator.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay for an annual license.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution a six out of ten.
I do not recommend the solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network Security Engineer at Social Security Commission
A good firewall activity reporting tool with next to real-time reporting capabilities, but lacking auto-detection when upgrades take place
Pros and Cons
- "We like the fact that we can run minute-by-minute reporting form this solution."
- "We would like to see some improvement on the upgrade process around this solution. There are sometimes communication issues when a new version of the firewall is implemented, and it fails to report back to this product."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution to actively pick up and report on all activities and connectivity going through the FortiGate firewall.
What is most valuable?
We like the fact that we can run minute-by-minute reporting form this solution.
We also appreciate that the interface of this solution is very good, and doesn't require a lot of configuration, updating, or maintenance.
What needs improvement?
We would like to see some improvement on the upgrade process around this solution. There are sometimes communication issues when a new version of the firewall is implemented, and it fails to report back to this product.
We would also like to be able to pull off incident reports and display them graphically using this solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for about three years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of this solution is okay. There is some room for improvement, and so we would rate the stability as an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have found this to be a fairly scalable solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution is very easy, and takes around three hours to complete the implementation.
What about the implementation team?
We carried out the implementation using in-house resources.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The renewals for this solution are carried out yearly.
What other advice do I have?
We would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Solutions Consultant at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of the solution is reporting."
- "The solution can improve the incident response function to provide more detailed information on where the incident is originating."
What is our primary use case?
The customer purchased a Fortinet Firewall in order to run it as a decentralized block and collect amazing security logs from their internet usage or other data from the box. The benefit of having an on-premise firewall is that they don't have to worry about any subscription, and the storage space it consumes is minimal due to the internal hard drive of the FortiAnalyzer. Furthermore, the firewall does not consume a lot of traffic from the internet due to it being on-premise.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of the solution is reporting. The report that accompanies the solution includes the top 10 usages, threats to be aware of, and any highlights. Additionally, the API can be connected to other systems to receive more notifications.
What needs improvement?
The solution can improve the incident response function to provide more detailed information on where the incident is originating.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and we have never experienced downtime.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I give the scalability of the solution an eight out of ten.
This solution is suitable for enterprise customers with a large number of devices and logs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer enables the compilation of log files over a period of time, such as 90 days in Thailand. This is especially useful for gathering and analyzing data.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is simple. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is an out-of-the-box solution, so we can start customizing as soon as we finish the installation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I give the cost a seven out of ten. I believe that Fortinet is a cost-effective brand, making it a competitive option in terms of pricing.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
An alternative solution is SolarWinds, which analyzes server performance, and could be a competitor's CM solution or a managed service that sends data from sensors on the site to their facility. The primary distinguishing feature of SolarWinds is its form factor. SolarWinds must be installed on a server and requires server resources. In the past, a large amount of OS and other resources were necessary, but the form factor has remained the same.
What other advice do I have?
I give the solution an eight out of ten.
Due to the high cost, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is not feasible to use for certain office or branch office environments. A possible compromise could be to use a combination of two solutions: for banks, the file-based solution may be beneficial, but for on-premises locations, it could be worthwhile to make use of the existing value and use it to centrally control and manage the data.
I recommend utilizing the FortiAnalyzer if our log volume is sufficient and we have a FortiGate.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
You can also download premade reports on the portal, but the user experience could be better
Pros and Cons
- "FortiAnalyzer helps us discover what's happening on the network."
- "They could always improve the interface and the user experience."
What is our primary use case?
FortiAnalyzer is a log analytics tool. Our company has around 600 to 700 people.
What is most valuable?
FortiAnalyzer helps us discover what's happening on the network.
What needs improvement?
They could always improve the interface and the user experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used FortiAnalyzer for four or five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate FortiAnalyzer eight out of 10 for stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is irrelevant to me because we have a small setup. One analyzer is enough for me.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up FortiAnalyzer isn't complex and takes two or three hours. They have a prebuilt OVA we can deploy using Ansible. Next, we configure FortiGate to send the logs to the FortiAnalyzer. You can also download premade reports on the portal.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You pay an annual license based on the volume of logs per day.
What other advice do I have?
I rate FortiAnalyzer seven out of 10.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network manager admin at Yamaha
Help global support, beneficial reports, and suitable for all business sizes
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is the capturing of traffic for reports."
- "Fortinet FortiAnalyzer should come bundled with other Fortinet solutions. Additionally, the performance and updates could improve. They need to test their updates better so there are not as many bugs."
What is our primary use case?
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is for log collection and reporting.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is the capturing of traffic for reports.
What needs improvement?
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer should come bundled with other Fortinet solutions. Additionally, the performance and updates could improve. They need to test their updates better so there are not as many bugs.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Fortinet FortiAnalyzer for approximately 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is good.
We have approximately 2,800 people using this solution in my organization on a daily basis.
The solution is suitable for all sized businesses.
How are customer service and support?
The support from Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is responsive. If the Indian support can support only the lowest priority work and the global team can support any kind of topic. The global support is experienced and technically sound. The Indian support can improve by having better knowledge.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used Palo Alto and when comparing it to Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, Palo Alto is better. However, it is priced too high.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is simple.
I rate the initial setup of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer a four out of five.
What about the implementation team?
We did the deployment of the solution in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We pay approximately $11,000 for a three-year license to use Fortinet FortiAnalyzer. When we compared the price of this solution to others it is not expensive. Palo Alto is a more expensive solution.
I rate the price from Fortinet FortiAnalyzer a four out of five.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others is if there are not any budget restraints then I would recommend choosing Palo Alto or FireEye. If there is a budget then Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is good.
I rate Fortinet FortiAnalyzer an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2025
Product Categories
Log ManagementPopular Comparisons
Dynatrace
Splunk Enterprise Security
IBM Security QRadar
Elastic Security
Grafana Loki
Elastic Observability
Security Onion
Graylog Enterprise
LogRhythm SIEM
Elastic Stack
Amazon CloudWatch
syslog-ng
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Log Management tools and software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
- Which Windows event log monitoring tool do you recommend?
- What is the difference between log management and SIEM?
- Splunk vs. Elastic Stack
- How can Cloudtrail logs be used effectively to improve log monitoring?
- Why hot data and cold data differences in SIEM solutions are not discussed sufficiently?
- When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
- Why are Log Management tools important for companies?