F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) Reviews

The load balancing features are valuable. We use a lot of web applications. The solution helps us to integrate with our core banking system. We are happy with the configurations and interface.

Most support teams are from other countries. We do not have knowledgeable support teams locally.

I have been using the solution for almost two years.

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten.

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. We have more than 100 engineers. Our technical team is strong.

A third-party vendor deployed the product for us.

We see a 100% return on investment in the product.

The tool is a little bit expensive. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

We have moved to microservices. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

We use F5 BIG-IP APM to control and monitor device access based on MAC addresses.

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has improved our organization's ability to manage and secure remote connections, particularly from external partners.

The product allows us to create customized portals for your users.

They should work on issues related to login and access for MacOS addresses. They could provide us with direct access to edit the policies. Additionally, there need to be more features for network, portal, and VPN access. Integrating identity providers and single sign-on solutions can simplify user authentication and access control.

We have F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) version 17.1.0 for six months.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the product's scalability a ten out of ten.

The technical support team takes around a month to resolve the case.

Neutral

The initial setup process is complex as we have sync policies between two sites.

The platform generates a return on investment for us.

I rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) a ten out of ten.

We use the product for load balancing. We use it to read, understand, and direct traffic.

The solution helps us to distribute the load.

Stickiness is the most valuable feature of the product.

The solution’s automation is not good. The solution’s GUI looks very old.

I have been using the solution for four years.

The solution is stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The scalability of the product is high. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Seven people in my organization are using the product.

The initial setup was complex.

The deployment was done in-house.

We see an ROI on the solution.

The product is very expensive.

We have specific cookies with stickiness. The product should not be used for WAF. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Our primary use case for this solution is remote access VPN and VPI integration with VMware, and we deploy the solution on-premises.

The performance of the solution is valuable.

The operational deployment is not great and can be improved.

We have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. Approximately 1,000 users are utilizing the solution.

We have had a good experience with customer service and support. I rate them a ten out of ten.

Positive

We previously used Cisco ASA and House CCure. We chose to switch to this solution based on our company's needs.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten, and I recommend it. The solution is good, but its functionality start offering can be improved.

I use F5 BIG-IP APM to connect to my company's private network and access the tools that I need.

F5 BIG-IP APM is relatively easy to use. 

F5 BIG-IP APM disconnects when you leave it for long enough, but that is natural for IT solutions to do. That's a little bit frustrating.

I have been using F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) for approximately a year and a half.

The stability of the F5 BIG-IP APM could be better.

F5 BIG-IP APM is used within our company and we have approximately 17,000 employees.

I have contacted the support of F5 BIG-IP APM for the initial setup only.

I rate F5 BIG-IP APM a seven out of ten.

I primarily used the solution for portal access.

It was scalable.

The solution is stable and reliable. 

The portal access was very good.

The initial setup was complex.

They could do a better job on the reporting and how we can use the data, provide more detail on the reporting logs, and show how we can export them and have graphical views. The reporting doesn't have graphical views, which makes things hard. You have basic reports that you can export, however, it's not that easy to use. The reporting needs to be improved a bit.

I have used the solution for a couple of years.

It was very stable, the solution itself. However, the underlying software, the LTM software, had an issue when we deployed with the failover. The APM itself, the access policy manager, I find the solution a great, great tool. It's very stable. We used it for years and we deployed it for approximately more than 100 applications at the same time which is why it took so long to implement.

For the organization I was working for, there are different solutions being used. I would say, in terms of the number of users, F5 was around 10,000.

It was scalable enough for our purposes.

I did not use something previously, however, after using this solution I did use a different product.

The initial setup was not easy. It was pretty complex.

I was the integrator. I worked as an integrator for the solution. I worked as an expert and it still took six to nine months to implement that.

Maintenance requires a team. It's not one person. It's a team that is managing not only APM. They were managing a component like a load balancer. They were managing network components. They were managing many other components. That team was a big team of maybe 15 to 20 people working across different profiles.

I worked as an integrator and would implement the solution for clients.

I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for access management.

The solution is stable and reliable.

The scalability is good.

The solution is pretty technical.

The initial setup is complex. 

The solution is quite costly.

The solution could offer better reporting.

The management aspect of the solution needs improvement. 

I've used the solution for one year. 

The product is stable. I haven't noticed any bugs or glitches and I haven't seen it crash or freeze. It seems to be reliable and the performance is good.

The solution can scale if a company needs to expand it. It's not a problem.

I've been able to work with technical support in the past and I have had positive experiences. When we have issues, they help. We are satisfied with their services. 

The initial setup is not very straightforward or easy. It's complex. 

I can handle the initial setup myself. I do not need the assistance of an integrator or consultant. 

The solution is expensive. It's not a cheap product.

You do need to pay extra for certain features and services. 

Our company didn't use F5 ourselves, however, we sell F5 products. We're resellers.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

I'd recommend this solution to other users and companies. 

This is a product that is easy to install and integrate, and it is simple to use.

The most valuable feature is the SSL VPN.

It allows you remote access to applications, such as those from Microsoft, as well as to our internal website.

The price of this product can be improved.

We have been using F5 APM for one year.

The stability is okay.

Scalability depends on the office and the number of remote users. We have about 50 users.

Using the documentation available on the website, it was easy to set up.

The F5 Access Policy Manager is something that I have experience with and I am happy with it. This is a product that I can recommend for others.

At this point, we don't have requirements beyond what this product provides, so I cannot think of any additional features that it needs.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.