We performed a comparison between webMethods.io Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"Based on the information I have, the solution's most valuable feature is its capability of implementing custom solutions."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"API management lifecycle is the most valuable."
"The main feature — the publication of the API, the management section — is great in general."
"The flexibility is definitely a highlight. We have flexible mapping capabilities, allowing us to provide common mappings or create custom ones as needed."
"It's very scalable, which is one of the best features."
"WSO2 API Manager's most valuable features are the simple interface that is easy to use and the APIs lifecycle."
"Functionality-wise, I like WSO2 API Manager - Publisher API and WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The technical support must be improved."
"We had some problems with the reverse proxy not being able to invoke fully qualified domain names, so we have to build some custom scripts to solve this issue."
"The initial setup can be difficult."
"Integration is an area that needs to be improved."
"We found WSO2 API Manager to be a bit complex."
"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."
"They don't have different URLs for administrators."
"The user interface could be a bit better."
webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 7th in API Management with 33 reviews. webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and SSIS, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our WSO2 API Manager vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
