We performed a comparison between Symantec Norton 360 [EOL] and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"It provides confidence by ensuring software programs are virus free and file integrity through an online backup."
"One valuable feature is Threat Prevention with the on-demand scan."
"The user behavioral analysis feature is great."
"The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized console where everything can be controlled by the administration."
"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."
"We like the management of the ePO, and we like the management console."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The support needs improvement."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The free online storage capacity is limited."
"I think it would be nice if Dynamic Application Control would come together with McAfee Endpoint Security."
"The product could do more to keep administration alerted to detected threats on endpoints."
"The solution could provide open XDR in addition to EDR."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"The resolution time should be faster."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
Earn 20 points
Symantec Norton 360 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. Symantec Norton 360 [EOL] is rated 8.6, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Norton 360 [EOL] writes "Provides online backup in case of ransomware and hardware failure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Symantec Norton 360 [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.