We performed a comparison between Microsoft OneDrive and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."Image management is great since the search is simple, and accessing images with labels is easy."
"We use Microsoft OneDrive for file sharing without the need for additional hardware (such as flash drives or external hard drives)."
"The most valuable feature is to be able to modify the file online and keep it stored on the cloud, since it is not necessary to download it to make modifications."
"It is good as a central hub for the storage of documents and sharing among team members."
"It's pretty easy to learn. Once someone taught me, I was able to navigate it quite easily."
"Scalability is good just because it is a cloud-based product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the amount of space allotted to each user that is issued a subscription."
"It helps you keep organized."
"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."
"The tool's implementation has made life easier for customers. It is sold by SAP. The integration between SAP and the solution is good, making it easy to access the documents. It is widely recognized as a market leader in enterprise document management."
"I did not face issues with the product's scalability...The solution's technical support is good."
"It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."
"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."
"The product can be integrated with different solutions."
"The technical support is really very bad."
"The online application is quite limited, for this and other Office offerings."
"If I want to pick out certain criteria of pictures, Google enables me to do that whereas OneDrive is a bit sort of flaky."
"The user interface could be a little more intuitive."
"The security is not as flexible as it is with Dropbox, which means that we can't share our OneDrive files."
"OneDrive is a bit behind competing products like Dropbox and Box."
"The website could be improved. Sometimes I try to login and the website has issues, I can't retrieve my documents."
"Performance is an issue when sharing a large number of files in a single folder."
"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."
"Support could be enhanced. The first line of support consists of individuals who lack experience with some key aspects. When you create a support ticket, the time to resolve the issue may be prolonged because the first person may not understand the system or the solution."
"The product could improve its scalability."
"The ease of use should be addressed."
"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."
"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made."
Microsoft OneDrive is ranked 4th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 19 reviews while OpenText Content Manager is ranked 10th in Enterprise Content Management with 21 reviews. Microsoft OneDrive is rated 8.2, while OpenText Content Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft OneDrive writes "A transparent and self-explanatory storage system for data and files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Content Manager writes "A document management system that integrates well with SAP, Salesforce and Oracle ". Microsoft OneDrive is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Box, Atlassian Confluence and Citrix ShareFile, whereas OpenText Content Manager is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and Alfresco.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.