We performed a comparison between Microsoft Office SharePoint Server and Mindjet MindManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps."
"The software is friendly to use for mixing data and analyzing it."
"The implementation and configuring of the resolution are very easy in the online version."
"The forms aspect of the solution, for example, the creation of surveys, is its most valuable aspect."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself."
"Document management and records management features are the most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Communication Site."
"The solution is scalable. You can do both horizontal and vertical scaling."
"The most valuable feature is being able to export to Microsoft Project."
"The areas around security, such as protection, need to be included."
"This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result."
"The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration."
"The permission management features need improvement."
"It is a bit restrictive to develop in the cloud version. A lot of features are in the cloud now, and you have to develop on the outside. As far as the platform and the programming side of things are concerned, it is moving more towards configuration management rather than programming. When we are doing solutions, we are basically just configuring it to make solutions happen rather than actually using the Visual Studio code and developing from scratch in the cloud. It is almost like creating an app. You have created an app for your phone, but the app doesn't really sit on your phone. It sits somewhere on a server, and the database sits on another server. The app is just pulling and pushing information. The whole development has changed. We used to install things directly on the server and then run the application from the server. Now, it is more of a modular architecture."
"The search feature needs improvement. I can never find the information I need when I use it."
"I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications."
"The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are."
"Since I have been using such an old version, most of the improvements have already been made, but I would suggest moving forward with the times and creating a cloud-based solution for universal access."
More Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 11th in Content Collaboration Platforms while Mindjet MindManager is ranked 4th in Mind Mapping Software. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.6, while Mindjet MindManager is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Stable, integrates well with Teams, and has flexible and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mindjet MindManager writes "An Easy to use tool for brainstorming and planning, compatible with Microsoft Project". Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with Amazon WorkDocs, Datto Workplace, FileCloud, Kiteworks and HighQ, whereas Mindjet MindManager is most compared with Visio, draw.io, Office 365 and Atlassian Confluence.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
