We performed a comparison between Skyhigh Security and Trend Micro Web Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"The most valuable features are the antivirus as a whole, the anti-malware, and all of the protection features that scan our enterprise devices."
"On the outside, the main differentiation is because Lookout ingest. They have ingested basically all of the apps for the last ten years and all the versions of all the apps, and we have that in a corporate database that allows us to do very large-scale machine learning and analysis on that data set. That's not something that any of the competitors really have the capability to do because they don't have access to the data set. A lot of the apps you can no longer get them because that version of the app is five or six years old, and it just doesn't exist anywhere anymore, except within our infrastructure. So, the ability to have that very rich dataset and learn from that dataset is a real differentiator."
"The protection offered by the product is the most valuable feature. It detects vulnerabilities or traps on our users' phones and then prompts them to clean up their devices. Tools we used previously would only discover, which required us to gather information on the backend, so Lookout is a welcome upgrade."
"The initial setup is fairly straightforward and easy to perform."
"The most valuable features of MVISION Cloud are the automatic reports and modification incidents."
"It's a great product with solid features."
"The solution performs well."
"It is easy to configure rules."
"User analytics."
"The management is very good."
"Tokenization."
"It's a stable solution."
"The security of Trend Micro Web Security is good."
"The most valuable feature is machine learning, which automatically monitors the activity on the machine."
"I feel that it is a user-friendly product that provides quick response to users."
"It's secure and useful from an administrative point of view, with controllable login monitoring and so on."
"The solution is stable."
"We find the advanced license for the DLP to be particularly useful with this product."
"Threat protection solution with good stability and scalability. Installation is straightforward. Support for this product is good."
"From the analysis that we've done, they do seem to be maybe a step behind in trying to enter the market with a new solution. But when they do pick up, they do come out with some good products."
"Lookout was moving into the SSE space. And so their work on SecureWeb Gateway and SD-WAN is still sort of evolving."
"We just submitted an enhancement request reflecting the main area we want to see improvement in; the APIs. Currently, we're able to build dashboards, but it's somewhat backward because we use our MDM API to create them. Lookout should provide API to customers so we can query our data and use it in our cloud, and this is the only outstanding area for improvement with the product right now."
"The stability depends on the service from where you access it. Because sometimes, the place you are in, you have Gateway. You don't have Gateway. The gateway is overutilized. At the end, you need to go through their gateways. And this is the key point here. You have a tracking point. If it's not well orchestrated, and it scales up as you add more to the existing team, you will suffer"
"Needs integration with other technology ecosystems."
"The biggest challenge we have with McAfee is their cross-cloud support."
"The documentation could be improved."
"The tool could improve flexibility with the creation of reports/querying data."
"The encrypted disk implementation could be improved. I currently use it from a dongle or USB key with two-factor authentication to access my computer."
"It would be nice to be able to get more advanced search functions to filter out data and quickly obtain the data that we need."
"The performance of the tool can be improved to provide faster report generation."
"The services take some time to load. It would be helpful if the loading time was reduced."
"The installation is a little bit complex."
"This solution has a lot of restrictions on what non-administrator users can do, including generating comparative code. We would like to see this changed as the product is developed."
"What could help Trend Micro Web Security in terms of improvement is the addition of a DDoS protection feature. It also needs to be more comprehensive to meet the needs of large-sized companies."
"The product's scalability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's scalability could be better."
"The product should be more secure and stable. It is also not flexible."
"Setup isn't very straightforward. You must have a certified technical engineer."
"The costs are a bit high in terms of licensing."
Skyhigh Security is ranked 6th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 51 reviews while Trend Micro Web Security is ranked 17th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 13 reviews. Skyhigh Security is rated 8.4, while Trend Micro Web Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Skyhigh Security writes "Good scalability, but the technical support service needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Web Security writes "Though a tool suitable for medium-sized businesses, it needs to work on its price model". Skyhigh Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope , Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Symantec Proxy and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Trend Micro Web Security is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Symantec Proxy, Cisco Umbrella, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway and Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway. See our Skyhigh Security vs. Trend Micro Web Security report.
See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.