We performed a comparison between Stormshield Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."It is stable and scalable."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station."
"The endpoint protection and disk encryption features are the most valuable."
"There is a new feature where you can set thresholds for all the CPU consumption allowing for no consumption on the servers when the scans happen. It is a separate plugin or addon, and if we have it on all the virtual machines it automatically checks the resources, and based on that, it will schedule the scans. That is something that I have not seen in other antivirus solutions, such as Symantec."
"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"Dynamic Application Containment."
"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."
"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."
"McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection is stable. We don't have any bugs being reported."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The support needs improvement."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"Detections could be improved."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better."
"The interface is complex."
"We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything."
"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"Although they have increased the complexity, it has affected the scanning speed."
Earn 20 points
Stormshield Endpoint Security is ranked 65th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. Stormshield Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Stormshield Endpoint Security writes "Protects the global station and has good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Stormshield Endpoint Security is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.