We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, PeopleSoft, and SYSPRO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"It’s a stable product."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's most valuable feature is its one consolidated platform that runs all the different aspects of companies."
"Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The product can scale."
"PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"It's a mature product."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is having the sources so that you're able to adapt the product to your needs. That was a big benefit."
"The PeopleSoft interface is very good."
"The synchronization of business processes, and the software, streamlined the shared service departments to run 40% leaner."
"The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"The Financial Accounting module, in general, is quite good. It is quite simple but powerful. Similarly, the Manufacturing functionality, including a multiple level bill of materials, is also quite useful."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"The product’s pricing should be improved."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"EnterpriseOne's integration could be improved."
"If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"Global payroll could be easier to use."
"There could be more adaptability of the system."
"The solution could improve by offering PeopleSoft site licenses. Currently, Oracle is pushing for everyone to transition to the cloud, but clients are discontent with this approach. Offering new PeopleSoft site licenses would be the most beneficial for our clients."
"Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"I would like to see better support, bug fixing, and documentation."
"I would like to see it become available again in Mexico."
"One aspect where PeopleSoft could see improvement is in its level of customization."
"SYSPRO at the moment is lacking on the project side. There's a module called Projects and Contracts, and it's a poorly designed module. One of my clients is a project-based organization, and they're finding it extremely difficult to manage their business using SYSPRO, to the point that they're looking at alternative solutions. The Projects and Contracts module is not a very useful tool. It does project accounting reasonably well, but in terms of putting in proper structures, like a work breakdown structure and so forth, it's actually quite poor. Their design or their architecture for the Projects module isn't good enough. They need to redesign it and redevelop it. They have made improvements. However, the problem is that if you're building on a bad foundation, then your building isn't going to be very strong. That's principally their problem. Any heavy equipment company would have a requirement to keep their equipment available for production. In that sense, SYSPRO has no maintenance management functionality. There's also no functionality for field services management. These two functionalities are critical for places like mines or for heavy equipment manufacturers who service the aftermarket and so forth. From a product perspective, this obviously isn't a good place to be because they are sort of taking themselves out of the market for quite a number of industries. They are constrained to manufacturing and distribution."
Earn 20 points