We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud API and App Integration and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"The interface is really good."
"The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager is very responsive."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The drag-and-drop functionality in Signavio is impressive and user-friendly, allowing easy connection to other elements without the need for excessive back-and-forth."
"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The setup is complex."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
"I think the biggest selling point that Signavio talks about is its collaborative aspect. However, there's still a lot more improvement in terms of what they can do, how they receive comments, address comments, whether they actually provide feedback, etc. There is still a little bit more improvement to be made on those areas."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."
"The collaboration and commenting are great. However, I think it would be more useful for people to get notifications of comments straight-away so we can react even quicker to them than we already can."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"There is always room for improvement is the capability of integration with other solutions."
"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."
Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Appian, ARIS Cloud and Camunda, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Informatica Cloud API and App Integration vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
