We performed a comparison between Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."
"We did some research and chose CloudSuite because it has the flexibility to cover a range of areas. And there were many other factors like traceability, for example, which is crucial for food production."
"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."
"The product's most valuable feature is production planning. It is one of the core features."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."
"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."
"The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV's most valuable feature is the integration with other Microsoft solutions."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is good for smaller-sized companies."
"The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly."
"All of the features are valuable, depending on where you implement them. I've done implementations in 60 countries, across 86 different companies and groups, and each company has a different reason for why they want to use it. Every single feature that I've implemented has been successful, and for some companies, where they didn't use the functionality, they have moved to external products or they've integrated into other applications."
"It is a stable solution."
"Planning needs to be improved. That is, industry-specific planning details need to be added and refined."
"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."
"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
"Pricing is always an area where there is room for improvement."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."
"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."
"They need to improve their processes."
"In the next release, I would like to see a quality check module - Navision doesn't have one, and the industry very much requires it."
"I would like a more modular and user-friendly interface."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"The product should improve work optimization."
"I work in Pakistan, and many people want desktop solutions. They don't want to work on the cloud. They want a strictly on-premises solution."
"It could be more stable."
"The solution's event management can be improved."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Infor CloudSuite Industrial is ranked 15th in ERP with 10 reviews while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is ranked 3rd in ERP with 62 reviews. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor CloudSuite Industrial writes " Advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central writes "Easy to deploy, extremely stable, and highly scalable". Infor CloudSuite Industrial is most compared with Infor LN, Infor M3, Epicor ERP, SAP Business One and Infor Distribution SX.e, whereas Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, SAP Business One, SAP ERP and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our Infor CloudSuite Industrial vs. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.