CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs CylancePROTECT comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk Logo
1,604 views|1,084 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
BlackBerry Logo
6,064 views|4,563 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and CylancePROTECT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT Report (Updated: May 2022).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually""You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them.""CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is very easy to manage, which I like. The solution also has a dashboard where you can see which software is suspicious, which I find valuable.""The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management.""The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its ability to reset passwords every time that it is needed or periodically.""I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good.""The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features.""This is the number one product for privilege account security."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pros →

"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected.""CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices.""The deployment of updates is easy.""​Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product.""What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system.""The most valuable features of CylancePROTECT are its powerful machine-learning capabilities and predictive intelligence.""​Very easy to deploy. It can be done one by one or deployed by customizing an MSI file for GPO push.​""Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"

More CylancePROTECT Pros →

Cons
"The price of the solution should improve.""The solution's pricing could be better.""For an experienced system implementer it will take approximately one day. However, for somebody who is inexperienced it may take up to five days.""One area that has room for improvement is in managing the credentials for network devices.""Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies.""CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent.""CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution.""The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Cons →

"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating.""CylancePROTECT could be improved in its technical support and communication.""The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT.""An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly.""The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward.""The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening.""It is hard to manage.""It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."

More CylancePROTECT Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."
  • "I think that it was in the range of $200,000 that had to get approved."
  • "Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
  • "The cost for CyberArk is very high."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."
  • "The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
  • "We pay about $17 per user."
  • "CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."
  • More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Review closely how many endpoints you actually need before buying into a pricing level. Deal and deal with the VAR of your choice."
  • "The initial end-point cost may seem a little high (~$55/device/year) but when you look at the total peace of mind that the solution provides, with no reboots for updates, and negligible performance impact, it is well worth it."
  • "​Shop around for sure and be assured the price you pay will be close to other solutions available, but even at a slight mark-up from the other solutions, you are getting real endpoint protection versus nothing more than a cheap security blanket that might keep you warm at night."
  • "Do not get hung up on price. You pay for what you get and expensive will hurt one time, where cheap will hurt forever, especially if you fall victim to a ransom attack, etc.​"
  • "Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user."
  • "I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is."
  • "The monthly fee is $55 USD per user."
  • More CylancePROTECT Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
    Top Answer:CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files… more »
    Top Answer:It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point.
    Top Answer:I rate the tool a ten out of ten when it comes to the ease of use or management part.
    Top Answer:The licensing part of the product is too expensive compared to other solutions in the market. There are other competitors of CylancePROTECT in the market who have been keeping the prices of their… more »
    Top Answer:The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be more competitive.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,604
    Comparisons
    1,084
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    601
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    6,064
    Comparisons
    4,563
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Viewfinity
    Blackberry Protect
    Learn More
    Overview

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

    Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

    Blackberry Protect is a next generation artificial intelligence (AI) based endpoint protection platform (EPP) that prevents breaches and provides added controls for safeguarding against sophisticated cyberthreats. It uses predictive analysis to quickly and accurately find even the most advanced threats before they ever take place. Blackberry Protect’s cloud-based supercomputer mines hundreds of millions of files from all over the cloud, allowing it to predict and stop any hacker dead in their tracks.

    Blackberry Protect runs on a lightweight agent and requires no internet connection. Instead of taking up massive amounts of computing power, it typically requires less than 1% of a system’s available computing resources. In addition, it only needs to be upgraded if the model is improved, which means that you can run it on your local servers and have constant and uninterrupted access to it.

    Benefits of Blackberry Protect

    Some of the benefits of using Blackberry Protect include:

    • The use of advanced AI analytics to provide extremely fast protection. The solution scans any and all applications that attempt to execute commands in your system. If it determines that the application is a threat, then it will respond to the threatening action within milliseconds. The anti-viral software will cancel or disallow any actions that the application attempts to initiate.
    • Minimizing of potential threats by cutting off the access of unauthorized devices. Blackberry Protect allows users to determine which devices are allowed to run on their network. It enforces the security rules that your system administrators set and denies hackers the ability to penetrate your system through unapproved devices.
    • Uses less computing power while still providing your system with a robust level of protection. Blackberry Protect runs on a lightweight agent that requires you to devote a fraction of the computing power that similar solutions require. This ensures that your system does not have to sacrifice security for processing power.

    Reviews from Real Users

    The Blackberry Protect software stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms that the solution uses to detect and deal with threats and the ability to scale your level of protection according to your needs.

    PeerSpot user Donald D., the owner of Terra Controls, notes the value of having both artificial intelligence and machine learning in a single product when he writes, “The most valuable feature is the AI and ML-based virus protection that does not rely on signature-based detection methods. The way this product works is that it does not go to a central server to pick up the latest virus definitions. Instead, it's a processor-powered search that checks to see if anything out of the ordinary is running on your machine. It looks for anomalies and cancels processes that do not look normal. For example, if a program tries to read the registry and then make a change, but it hasn't been authorized, then it is assumed to be a bad actor and the process is canceled or the action is disallowed.”

    PeerSpot user Orlando B., Head of Systems at SKN Caribecafe Ltda, noted how this program is not a one-size-fits-all solution when he writes, “The solution is very good at quickly and easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and server. It's very easy to control and to see what is happening with each computer. It's very easy to choose which computer I can look at and check.”

    Sample Customers
    Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Wholesaler/Distributor8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company19%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Security Firm12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business69%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Buyer's Guide
    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT
    May 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 27 reviews while CylancePROTECT is ranked 23rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT report.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.