We performed a comparison between Bizagi and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the organizational modeling capability."
"With the appropriate governance framework, properly trained business analysts can be empowered to design and build business solutions themselves."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"It automates a completely manual, complicated process."
"The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature."
"It can be useful as a tool to improve your communications and the control of your processes. For example, when you have to explain a process to seven or eight stakeholders who think differently as well as have different experiences in different functional departments, it is not easy. Sometimes you are using a lot of technical terms, and other times, you are dealing with management terminology. The visual representation helps you create a better alignment and understanding for different roles and stakeholders of your workforce."
"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is that it is compatible with Visual Studio and .NET, and we can program it. Its speed is very good, and it is also stable and easy to deploy."
"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"There could be more documentation."
"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"Framework approach, which extends to reusability in tools, like Pega, for deployment management could be improved."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"It is difficult to drive ROI on types of processes involving complex business rules."
"When you start working with information modeling, et cetera, here is no really good solution for the data modeling and information modeling."
"Also, the tool sometimes feels not so mature when we find random deploy errors from testing to production environment."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"On the monitoring side of things, the UI for monitoring could be improved. It's a bit cumbersome to work with."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"The patching of infrastructure is not very smooth and improved authentication should be added in the next feature."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bizagi is ranked 7th in Process Automation with 78 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Bizagi is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Bizagi vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
