We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger, Mule ESB, and Oracle Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."
"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."
"Mule Expression Language"
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"It is stable."
"The ability to master the process in one location."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"I like the ease of deployment and the ease of implementation."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"Limitation on external subscribers to listen to the messages on the bus."
"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"Mule ESB could be more user-friendly. I think users must learn about the architecture before they start coding. The price could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an EDIFACT integration."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"Community editions need more attention."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"This solution should work better with RESTful services."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"We have faced a problem with the heap memory side, but that is stable now."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"There are issues, especially if you want to create some compensation in your service bin."
