We performed a comparison between Appian and ELMA 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"Appian is a very low code platform. It's very easy to learn and use."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"It has created executable requirements and speeds up the SDLC process greatly."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"This is the most complete solution of its kind."
"The technical support is excellent."
"A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"Native mobile capabilities or hybrid mobile app capabilities are very limited. Things like offline sync, offline storage, access to smartphone device features, etc. are not supported by the Appian platform yet."
"What could be improved is more on the front end perspective, like the user interface and the mobile application aspect."
"There are four areas I believe Appian could improve in. The first is a seamless contact center integration. Appian does not have a contact center feature. The second is advanced features in RPA. The third would be chatbot and email bot integration—while Appian comes with chatbot and email bot, it's not as mature as it should be, compared to the competition. The fourth area would be next best action, since there is not much of this sort of feature in Appian. These are all features which competitors' products have, and in a mature manner, whereas Appian lacks on these four areas. I see customers who are moving from Appian to Pega because these features are not in Appian."
"It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"The solution could improve by being more responsive when dealing with large quantities of data. Additionally, they can make the decision or rules engine better. It cannot handle too many rules or too many decisions at once."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"Customers want improved productivity."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while ELMA 365 is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Appian is rated 8.4, while ELMA 365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas ELMA 365 is most compared with Camunda, Bitrix24, WorkFusion and Bizagi.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.