We performed a comparison between Agiloft Workflow and BPM and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's very safe. It has a high degree of security, much better than many other solutions I have researched."
"The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"The case management functionality of this solution has been most valuable."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"Agiloft does not have a good user interface."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
Earn 20 points
Agiloft Workflow and BPM is ranked 45th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. Agiloft Workflow and BPM is rated 9.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Agiloft Workflow and BPM writes "Easy to use with a high degree of security and excellent flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Agiloft Workflow and BPM is most compared with , whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
