We performed a comparison between ADONIS, Comindware Tracker, and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."It's a very complete solution."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"It is a stable solution."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"Low code development."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The feature I have found most valuable is the easy synchronization with other tools."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"The functionality to design UI to be responsive and can run on multiple devices."
"Provides the power to understand and automate processes."
"Everything is coupled together and comes as one solution."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Good user interface and good add option."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"We have had to use Mule as an alternative integration tool because it is more flexible than IBM BPM."
"The coaches and the user interface are the areas that can be improved a lot. It is good in terms of data processing, but the UI, scripting, and coaches are not very user-friendly and developer-friendly. Performance is always an issue. The scripting and the pattern that it uses are very tedious for new developers to understand, and it takes time to master it in depth. When comparing IBM BPM with IBM APN, a lot of things are provided out of the box in IBM APN. We don't have to write code or a Java connector to make a functionality work. It would be very helpful and time-saving for developers if IBM BPM is improved in this area to provide many functionalities or drag-and-drop options so that the developers don't have to write the code."
"IBM BPM is stable, but sometimes there are issues with the server."
"If the processing gets better, it would be more efficient."
"When you have to integrate files for enterprise applications."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"There is room for improvement in the stability."
"There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers."
Earn 20 points
