We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL], Mule Anypoint Platform, and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"It's easy to develop APIs."
"It can scale."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."
"It is simple to transfer files."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The stability could be better."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users."
"It requires some maintenance."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
Earn 20 points
