Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1074924 - PeerSpot reviewer
Networks Lead Engineer at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Good management capability and wireless heatmap, but NetFlow needs to be improved
Pros and Cons
  • "It gives you the ability to upgrade switches remotely, schedule the upgrade time, perform backups, and monitor the health of all networks."
  • "If you think about a centralized monitoring system, Cisco Prime is not good because it does not support third-party vendors like Palo Alto or FortiGate."

What is our primary use case?

This solution is being used for managing Cisco access points and managing network switches.

What is most valuable?

Cisco Prime is very good management-wise. It gives you the ability to upgrade switches remotely, schedule the upgrade time, perform backups, and monitor the health of all networks.

The wireless heatmap is very good.

What needs improvement?

The NetFlow is very limited, which is a disadvantage to this product. NetFlow is a very important tool that gives you a lot of information about what is happening for each device, including all of the hosts that are connected and what they are doing. For example, it will tell you if devices are accessing an on-premises application and you can use that information to help build usage statistics. With Cisco Prime, it is not reporting all of the Cisco devices. In particular, some of the access point devices are missing. NetFlow is about network visibility, so it should definitely not be limited to Cisco products.

If you think about a centralized monitoring system, Cisco Prime is not good because it does not support third-party vendors like Palo Alto or FortiGate.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Cisco Prime for two years.

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Prime [EOL]
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Prime [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is always stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

If you consider scalability from the point where it can be used with everything, then it is not scalable. It cannot monitor all of the devices in your network, as a normal monitoring system would.

We have more than 1,000 users.

How are customer service and support?

Cisco's technical support is very good for all of its products and in all aspects. You get a very good response from them. I have no doubts about the OEM because they are really very good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used SolarWinds and Microsoft SCOM in the past.

SolarWinds is used on the networking side and can also be used for monitoring the health of the hardware. SCOM was being used for maintaining Microsoft products, such as keeping track of the number of licenses they have, performing health checks on Windows systems, and other monitoring tasks.

How was the initial setup?

I did not personally set up this device, although it is a Cisco product, which normally comes ready to use. With a Cisco product, you just need to switch it on, put in a username and password, and then you have access. It's straightforward. I think that it is probably an easy setup, and not difficult to do.

What about the implementation team?

We have two in-house engineers who take care of all of the network setup and maintenance. They are also responsible for operating all of the monitoring systems, network devices, firewalls, etc.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to anybody who is considering this solution is to look carefully at your infrastructure. Our plan is to take Cisco Prime out because we do not have a fully-Cisco infrastructure and it is not compatible with all of the devices.

It is very good for Cisco products and if your entire infrastructure is Cisco, or you want to monitor a specific section that is entirely Cisco, then it will work well. However, if you have a mix of devices from different vendors and you want to centralize then this is not the right solution. Also, I would not recommend using two different solutions for the same purpose. Find one that works with everything, like SolarWinds or Netskope.

Ultimately, I think that Cisco Prime will be taken off the market and replaced with Cisco DNA. It has all of the features such as NetFlow, monitoring, and smart analytic systems. It is another Cisco product doing the same job and much better. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
EVP – Central Asia,Kazakhstan, Ukraine at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Real User
A comprehensive network management with real-time monitoring, automation, and robust security features
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable is the assistance for network support."
  • "They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for Infrastructure Hyperion to support the financial and strategic planning processes and for remote device configuration. When we perform network repairs and upgrades, we need to implement modernization procedures and methods.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable is the assistance for network support.

What needs improvement?

They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for eight years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate its stability capabilities ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We don't use it to increase the workload. There are around ten people actively involved with operating this system.

How are customer service and support?

Its technical support offers the finest experience and the most effective solutions. I would rate it ten out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We use other well-known software for our purposes, like POTG and Rubix software, to oversee our infrastructure monitoring. I believe Cisco Prime is exclusively used for Cisco equipment and we haven't encountered any problems  with it.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost is quite high.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate it ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Prime [EOL]
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Prime [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Muluken Alemu - PeerSpot reviewer
TechFin Solutions Department Lead at IE Network Solutions PLC
MSP
Top 20
Highly stable, ensures our network's performance and security
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is its excellent audio and video conferencing with clear quality and no interruptions."
  • "Some improvements are needed, specifically in the form of more updates and enhancements."

What is our primary use case?

We use Cisco Prime for network management, ensuring our network's performance and security. It also helps with project execution and project monitoring.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is its excellent audio and video conferencing with clear quality and no interruptions.

What needs improvement?

While it is a great solution, some improvements are needed, specifically in the form of more updates and enhancements.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Cisco Prime for a month.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have not experienced any issues with the stability of the solution. I would rate the stability as a seven out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Cisco Prime is quite scalable.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is fairly easy. It only takes a few minutes to deploy it.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate Cisco Prime as a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Prime [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: June 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Prime [EOL] Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.