Cisco Prime [EOL] Reviews

Our primary use case for this solution is Assurance. It helps us manage and monitor analytics and fix issues such as poor voice quality. We can investigate by fetching reports and real-time alert generation for VoIP infrastructure. For example, suppose there is latency during calls, it can be immediately alerted to take immediate action before we investigate the deeper issue.

Cisco Prime could be improved for other devices like Aruba and Juniper by focusing on the features to be enabled for non-Cisco vendors. For example, the onboarding process could be improved and developed to enhance compatibility for non-Cisco devices. Otherwise, for Cisco infrastructure, it's well suited.

We have been using this solution for approximately ten years.

The solution's stability depends on the product's chosen requirements.

The solution is scalable.

We have had a good experience with customer service and support. They are responsive and helpful. They are available to assist when issues occur but do not provide support for the entire configuration process.

We previously used Juniper. However, it did not provide some of the parameters available on Cisco.

The product is both straightforward and complex. However, it is primarily straightforward because Cisco provides their OVA template and open virtual appliances for deployment using the VMware ESXi. Hence, it's easy to deploy, but it's a little bit difficult to configure according to your use cases and what is performed or delivered to the customer.

Deployment can be done in three ways and the time varies depending on the chosen one.

I cannot comment on pricing and licensing as another department handles it.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including features for non-Cisco vendors. I recommend this tool to customers looking for a good tool that can provide an advanced level of monitoring for people with 90% infrastructure or inventory from Cisco.

Our company uses the solution for management of complex configurations, archiving routes and switches, and monitoring wireless connections. Our team of seven administrators serve as system integrators for our clients and currently manage more than 1,000 sites. 

The solution's configuration management tool is amazing because it centralizes and pushes configurations which saves a lot of volume and effort. 

The solution has issues with real time monitoring of devices and NetFlow such as inadequate visualization for reports, sources, and destinations. Because of this, I have to rely on other tools for monitoring and troubleshooting so I am only able to use 50% of the solution. 

I would like the solution to allow open monitoring for use with other products in the same fashion that competing vendors support any SMP products. 

I have been using the solution for six years. 

The solution is stable if the appliance is functioning properly without interruption. 

We experienced three cases where the solution was interrupted on push and almost corrupted. 

Sudden outages that interrupt host availability will cause instability. 

The solution is scalable from the configuration management side. 

There might be limitations on the monitoring side. 

Technical support is good with no issues. 

Positive

The initial setup is easy and deployment takes about 30 minutes. 

Our company implements the solution for customers. 

The solution uses a licensing model for pricing. 

The solution is only good for configuration management and has issues with real time monitoring. 

Our company had the expectation that we could use the solution for both configuration management and real time monitoring, but unfortunately we were not able to replace our other monitoring tool.

We still recommend that our customers use the solution for configuration management, especially if they have a lot of Cisco devices. 

Our primary use case for this solution is for network monitoring and conducting upgrades and we can manage devices in the network. Additionally, we deploy this solution on-premises.

We are planning to move to DNA Center, but we have legacy devices and near versions of devices that support Cisco DNA Center. We run both, but for DNA Center, we don't rely on it. In the future, when Cisco moves all of its device's DNA platforms, we will move from Cisco Prime to Cisco DNA Center.

Cisco Prime is user-friendly, so we are comfortable using it. In addition, we find the ability to monitor inventory and export reports from running networks valuable.

We would like to see the inclusion of detailed alerts. This feature is available in Cisco DNA Centre.

We have been using this solution for one year and are currently using version 3.8.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable, but if you want to expand the number of devices that can be used on the server, you will have to upgrade your license.

We have had a good experience with customer service and support which is why we have continued to use this product. However, the technical support depends on the licensing contract.

The initial setup depends on your experience with the specific product. It will not be difficult if you have had previous experience, but if you haven't, it may be difficult. In our case, we had moderate experience with our initial setup.

A solution integrator conducted the initial stages of deployment, but the other stages were completed in-house. Therefore, the time for deployment varies depending on the number of devices managed through Cisco Prime infrastructure for the site. Still, it doesn't take much time because multiple features like network discovery can be run with all the saved parameters.

We have seen a return on investment. When you have a central management plan, it saves a lot of costs. For example, the solution has reduced the resources and time needed to be spent on day-to-day tasks by managing our activities from a central management plane.

The licensing costs are much cheaper compared to Cisco DNA Centre. I rate the licensing costs a five out of ten because it is moderate. It is not too cheap or costly. The solution has a standard licensing fee and no additional charges, but the DNA licensing must be renewed every three, five or seven years.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good and has all the features we require for our environment. My advice to users implementing this solution for the first time would be to opt for Cisco DNA Center because, with time, I believe Cisco will force customers to use Cisco DNA Center because they may retire all other legacy platforms.

We use the solution to manage Cisco devices and other wireless products. 

Cisco Prime is a good tool for inventory monitoring and wireless management. 

I want the tool to improve data visibility. 

I have been using the solution for five years. 

I rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate Cisco Prime's scalability an eight out of ten. 

I have never had any experience with the technical support. 

Cisco Prime's deployment is complex. 

I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten. 

I rate the product an eight out of ten. 

The solution helps with the management and support of the enterprise network. 

The tool's performance is fine. 

The product needs to improve its stability. 

I have been using the product for more than 15 years. 

I would rate the solution's stability an eight out of ten since I have encountered bugs in the past. 

My company has 30-50 users for the product. 

The tool's setup is easy. One engineer is enough to handle the deployment and maintenance. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. 

We use the solution as a monitoring tool for management and configuration.

The technical support team is very good.

The product needs to improve its interface and reporting. The setup should be made easy.

I have used the solution for years.

The product is not at all easy to deploy. It needs quite a bit of server, and the person installing must have the knowledge to handle and manage the product.

If we have a license for Cisco DNA, we can use the same license for Cisco Prime.

I recommend the product for medium to large enterprises. I would recommend SolarWinds over Cisco Prime. SolarWinds is user-friendly, has a pretty good UI, and allows us to customize the report. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

We use Prime to manage all our Cisco products like wireless controllers, access points, switches, etc. 

The endpoint information Cisco Prime generates helps us troubleshoot, and it's also useful for compliance reporting and endpoint identification.

Cisco Prime is a little outdated. It will soon be discontinued and replaced by DNA Center, which offers similar functionality.

I have used Cisco Prime for about 10 years. 

I rate Cisco Prime 10 out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Prime eight out of 10 for scalability. Prime is a management tool, so the scalability is there. It's sufficient for our environment. 

I rate Cisco support eight out of 10. Overall, Cisco's support team is knowledgeable. They easily understand our questions and provide solutions fast. However, some of their engineers take longer, so I have to deduct a couple of points. 

Positive

I rate Cisco Prime nine out of 10. All Cisco products come with a quick start guide that tells you every step. The initial installation takes a few hours, but it takes longer to integrate and populate the system to capture all your information. You can complete the deployment in two days. 

I rate Cisco Prime seven out of 10 for affordability. All Cisco solutions are expensive. 

I rate Cisco Prime eight out of 10. I recommend it. It's a useful tool for managing large Cisco environments. 

I use Cisco Prime to check the interfaces and links and generate reports. I use the solution to see which locations are down.

What I found most beneficial from Cisco Prime is that it gives you an insight into what your network does, even when you're not actively monitoring what's going on with your network.

I would love for Cisco Prime to show bandwidth usage and consumption, but I can't monitor bandwidth usage at a given time on the version I use or on the subscription I have available. All I can see on Cisco Prime is the uptime depending on the date range or period I want to have an insight about, so this is an area for improvement in the solution.

If bandwidth usage and consumption data are available, that will help me with my reporting.

I discovered you need another license to see bandwidth utilization data. If Cisco can diffuse that functionality into a single subscription, I can monitor bandwidth usage and see reports and a few other functionalities, which would improve Cisco Prime.

I've been using Cisco Prime for around six months.

Cisco Prime is a stable product. Its stability is eight out of ten.

I've yet to try to scale Cisco Prime.

I've contacted Cisco Prime technical support, and as it can be problematic at times and other times pretty seamless, it's a seven out of ten for me.

Neutral

Cisco Prime was the first solution I used, and then I just supplemented it with a free version of PRTG.

I didn't do the initial setup for Cisco Prime because I just came into the company after the setup.

A third party implemented Cisco Prime for the company.

I've used PRTG and then Cisco Prime.

I have to check the version of Cisco Prime that I'm currently using, but I'm sure it isn't the latest version.

A third party deals with Cisco Prime, which can sometimes be troublesome, though it's pretty seamless at other times.

Up to thirty people use the solution within the company.

I'd tell people looking into Cisco Prime that the decision should be based on what you need the solution for. What are you looking to monitor? It would be best if you also looked into licenses supporting your use case. This is the best way to go about it.

My rating for Cisco Prime is eight out of ten.