Clients may use Azure Virtual Desktop for replacing some of their remote desktops and admin jump hosts.
Azure Virtual Desktop provides users the ability to do remote work in a secure environment that is easy to manage.
Clients may use Azure Virtual Desktop for replacing some of their remote desktops and admin jump hosts.
Azure Virtual Desktop provides users the ability to do remote work in a secure environment that is easy to manage.
As a service provider, the advantages of the product are the ease of integration.
The integration with Microsoft 365 is particularly noteworthy.
The multi-session Windows 10 feature is used and helpful.
Management aspects could still be enhanced.
Regarding pricing, the solution is affordable.
I have been dealing with Azure Virtual Desktop for about five years.
Installation and setup for Azure are pretty straightforward.
They had glitches in the past, but everything is fixed now, and I don't see any issues currently.
Azure is better concerning scalability and flexibility.
It takes too long to get a return call.
The quality overall is good, with the only concern being response time.
I have worked with Citrix and Horizon as solutions before.
When drawing a brief comparison between these tools, some require an on-premise environment, while some don't. Having a cloud-only solution is a benefit.
I am a service provider, and we work with various vendors, including Microsoft and AWS.
We primarily work with Microsoft as our flagship product, and we have another team for AWS. I build solutions around Microsoft.
I work on security, endpoint security, and endpoint management.
I primarily work with Microsoft solutions, including Windows Defender.
The team itself is very diverse.
I work with Microsoft Azure, dealing with infrastructure, Azure Virtual Desktops, and infrastructure solutions. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would rate this solution as an eight.
