ManageEngine vs NetApp

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
ManageEngine
Based on 285 reviews.
NetApp
Based on 1114 reviews.
Overview
Information Not Available
NetApp, Inc., formerly Network Appliance, Inc., is an American computer storage and data management company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It is a member of the NASDAQ-100. It was ranked on the Fortune 500 for the first time in 2012. NetApp was founded in 1992 by David Hitz, James Lau, It had its initial public offering in 1995. NetApp thrived in the internet bubble years of the mid 1990s to 2001, during which the company grew to $1 billion in annual revenue. After the bubble burst, NetApp's revenues quickly declined to $800 million in its fiscal year 2002. Since then, the company's revenues have steadily climbed.
Sample Customers
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity
ManageEngine IT360
Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source
Greenqloud qstack
Advania, HP, CB Technologies Inc., Redapt Engineering Co Ltd, vmware
NetApp SaaS Backup
Node4, Profi Engineering Systems
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Educational Organization
29%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Educational Organization
41%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.