Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1207530 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Helpful support, minimal coding required, and highly scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."

    What is most valuable?

    webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using webMethods Integration Server for approximately three and a half years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The stability of the webMethods Integration Server is good.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I rate the scalability of webMethods Integration Server a nine out of ten.

    Buyer's Guide
    webMethods.io
    May 2025
    Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
    856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is very good. We were using the peer services and they were helpful at supporting every aspect of webMethods Integration Server and with ARIS.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced.

    What other advice do I have?

    We would advise others to at least give webMethods Integration Server a try. Based on the solution's usability and ease of use it is very good. You don't have to do a lot of coding, it is close to an out-of-the-box functioning solution. It makes life easier.

    I rate webMethods Integration Server a nine out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer984546 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
    Real User
    Provides good visibility of one's applications
    Pros and Cons
    • "The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
    • "The deployment should be simplified."

    What is our primary use case?

    Our customers use webMethods Integration Server to integrate their retail solution, the frontend with the backend. 

    What is most valuable?

    The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved. The visibility with Java is not so easy. However, the solution allows a person to know where his application is in the ecosystem, which application he is using, what the protocol is and the number of requests. The solution makes identification easy. 

    What needs improvement?

    The installation process is very complex, there being many products, each having its own. The deployment should be simplified. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using webMethods Integration Server for more than 12 years. I have been working with it over the past 12 months and continue to do so. 

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The solution is very stable.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is scalable. 

    How was the initial setup?

    The installation process is very complex, there being many products, each having its own. The deployment should be simplified. Other than this, I feel it to be a good tool.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Java's visibility is not so easy and fairs unfavorably with that of the solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    I'm an integrator and use the product to provide solutions to vendors.

    The solution is a good ESB tool.

    I rate webMethods Integration Server as a nine out of ten. 

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    webMethods.io
    May 2025
    Learn what your peers think about webMethods.io. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
    856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    reviewer2300019 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Consulting Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Reseller
    Top 5
    A scalable solution that is easy to implement and provides good technical support
    Pros and Cons
    • "The tool supports gRPC."
    • "The learning curve is a little steep at first."

    What is most valuable?

    The tool supports gRPC. It is the best product in the market.

    What needs improvement?

    The tool has its own proprietary language. It does not use Java or C#. The learning curve is a little steep at first. Once we get familiar with it, we might like to use it. The product must provide AI features to auto-generate logic based on our request.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working with the product for more than 20 years.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is good.

    How was the initial setup?

    The product is easy to implement. We help our customers to implement the solution.

    What other advice do I have?

    People who want to use the product must request a trial. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
    PeerSpot user
    reviewer2300019 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Consulting Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Reseller
    Top 5
    A stable and scalable solution that can be used for B2B use cases
    Pros and Cons
    • "webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."
    • "The solution should include REST API calls."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use webMethods Trading Networks mostly for B2B use cases.

    What is most valuable?

    webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution.

    What needs improvement?

    The solution could be improved in the VTA part.

    The solution should include REST API calls.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using webMethods Trading Networks for more than 20 years.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    webMethods Trading Networks is a scalable solution. We mostly recommend the solution to big companies.

    How was the initial setup?

    The solution's initial setup is straightforward.

    What other advice do I have?

    Since webMethods Trading Networks is much like proprietary software, users should try it on the trial version first and do some POC.

    Overall, I rate webMethods Trading Networks a nine out of ten.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free webMethods.io Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: May 2025
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free webMethods.io Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.