Ubuntu Linux Reviews

I have installed Ubuntu Desktop on my personal laptop. 

Nowadays, you can do everything with a browser, meaning you don't need a vulnerable, fancy solution like Windows for example.

I am aware that they package some versions that are lightweight and are not so process or memory-intensive however, I would like to see an even more lightweight version because I believe it is possible.

I have using Ubuntu for about 15 years and intend to increase my usage.

Ubuntu is very stable, I have zero issues.

I used Windows for a very long time, however my specialty has been on Unix systems.

I did the initial setup on my own. It takes about two hours, unattended, as it takes time to update and download.

I do not pay a licensing fee for this operating system.

I would recommend Ubuntu Linux. If people are scared of Linux machines they don't need to be, it is as simple as Windows. Don't be scared of the fact that it says Linux on the box, it's a desktop in itself.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux an 8 out of 10.

I use Ubuntu mostly for private purposes.

I think Ubuntu's performance is fine and so is its user interface. However, the latter is not as fancy as Microsoft Windows. It could be a bit fancier and easier to use. 

I have used Ubuntu only occasionally. I am not an experienced user. 

Ubuntu is a stable solution. 

Ubuntu is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is absolutely straightforward. 

There are no costs associated with Ubuntu. 

Ubuntu is rather stable, simple to deploy, stable, and well supported by an open-source community. I would recommend it as a possible alternative to Windows for those looking to avoid the cost associated with that operating system. It is definitely a cost-effective alternative for private usage.

We use Ubuntu Linux as an operating system for daily use. We use it for many purposes, for example, supporting, developing, configuring, and scripting.

The solution has high fantastic performance.

Ubuntu Linux could improve by having better documentation because sometimes their documentation is not very good.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for approximately 10 years.

Ubuntu Linux is stable.

We have 200 people using this solution in my organization.

Ubuntu Linux is easy to install. We already configured it to auto-install for other Linux servers. The process takes not more than 15 minutes.

For the implementation and maintenance of the solution, we have approximately six people.

We are saving money from not having to pay for an operating system that costs our company money because Ubuntu Linux is free to use.

We are using the free and open-sourced version of the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others because it is free and you can save licensing costs.

I rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

Our primary use case is for implementing anything that's open source, like a network monitoring tool or anything connected to network, security or vulnerability scanning. It can all be done with Linux. 

The solution is open source and free with a fast OS.

The installation of Ubuntu is somewhat complicated. It requires searching online forums and installation takes time. If there was additional training and documentation available, better support for integration, that would be helpful. The UI could be improved. 

I've been using this solution for over 20 years. 

For business, the initial deployment is straightforward. If additional hard disk is required, then that will be difficult. Deployment took around 20 minutes and I believe we have around 10 users. 

The solution is open source, so no licensing costs.

I recommend this solution if it's appropriate to your needs. 

I rate this product a seven out of 10. 

I am using it for the desktop system. I have its latest version.

It is stable and quite easy to use as compared to other Linux operating systems. They have created a system like Windows. It is simple and without any problems.

When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades. 

I have been using this solution for a few years.

For desktop, we don't need it to be scalable. Currently, it is for personal use, and there is only one user.

I have not used their technical support. Ubuntu probably has a lot of documents, but I never had to read something about it. I have used CentOS for dozens of years, so Ubuntu seems simple to me.

We use CentOS for our web servers. 

It is very simple. It took less than half an hour.

Usually, I do it by myself, and it is very simple.

It is free.

I would recommend Ubuntu Linux for other users who want to start using it.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a 10 out of 10.

Ubuntu is a Linux OS. The solution is primarily used for web servers and web traffic.

The solution is easy to use for developers and DevOps teams. 

The commands and user commands are very good. 

The repository and the security repository are up to date, which is great.

The product is very user-friendly.

We've found the solution to be quite stable so far.

The solution is free to use.

There is a very good open-source community surrounding the solution that can help you troubleshoot if you run into any issues. 

You need a Linux operating system to be the host of the web servers. We don't use a GUI. It's not like Windows. It's not for daily users to write documents or browsing sheets or browsing the internet.

The product could be easier to manage.

I've been using the solution for five or six years at this point.

The stability of the solution is very good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. 

The solution can scale if you need it to.

We don't really deal with technical support per see. It's a free-to-use open-source solution. The way it works is it has a community and you can submit to Ubuntu and you can get help from some of the people that lead this community. It's pretty good. You can find what you need to solve pretty much any problem you might have.

I've also used CentOS, and I would recommend Unbuntu over it.

I did not install the solution myself, however, if you decide to use the cloud you can choose it as a wizard. It's my understanding that it is pretty straightforward. 

The solution is free to use. It doesn't cost us anything. It's great that we have access without having to worry about licensing fees.

We don't use a GUI. We tend to focus on its OS layers. Therefore, we don't really deal with any dashboards.

I'd rate the solution at a perfect ten out of ten. It's been very reliable and we appreciate its capabilities overall.

It is useful for web servers, email servers, and file servers. I am using its latest version.

It is open-source, secure, and easy to use.

It can have more security.

I have been using this solution for 20 years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We currently have around ten users. We don't have any plans to increase its usage.

I am satisfied with their technical support.

I have used FreeBSD.

Its initial setup is straightforward. It took about 20 minutes.

I did it myself. We have a team of six engineers for deployment and maintenance. 

It is open-source. We don't have to pay for its license.

I would rate Ubuntu Linux a ten out of ten.

We mainly use this solution for application-related uses. We use it as our main Linux platform of choice. 

One of the best features is that it is constantly updated.

I have been using Ubuntu Linux for more than 15 years.

Ubuntu Linux is both stable and scalable.

I have never contacted their support team.

We actually use both Ubuntu Linux and CentOS, but CentOS is being decommissioned so our choice is Ubuntu.

Ubuntu Linux was very easy to deploy. You can install Ubuntu in many different ways and all of them are pretty straightforward. I also have a lot of experience with Ubuntu, so for me, the initial installation is very easy.

A team of four people is required for maintenance and deployment.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Ubuntu Linux a rating of ten. More people should use this solution.