Sysdig Secure Reviews

Sysdig Secure has many strong foundational features like compliance and benchmark, security, network access management, and vulnerability management.

Banks and financial institutions cannot use Sysdig Secure because it doesn't sell SaaS-hosted versions for under two hundred working nodes.

I have been using Sysdig Secure for one month.

I have not faced any stability issues with the solution.

I rate Sysdig Secure an eight or nine out of ten for stability.

It is very easy to scale Sysdig Secure. Around ten users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate Sysdig Secure a nine out of ten for scalability.

I have experience with Aqua. Sysdig Secure has features like network monitoring and an open-source threat detection engine, which Aqua does not have.

The solution's deployment is very easy and can be done in ten minutes.

Sysdig Secure has two agents: one for network monitoring and the other for security sites. You can install one agent if you would like to see network monitoring. You can deploy two agents if you would like to see network asset management and the security site.

I compared Sysdig Secure with other solutions like Aqua by opening a demo trial account and examining its features and benefits for one month.

Overall, I rate Sysdig Secure a nine out of ten.

We are a cloud provider, and we use the solution to collate some issues in our environment. 

The solution has improved the resolution time. We can detect any issue in the syslogs more quickly.

The log monitor is the most valuable feature.

I tested the solution, however, I haven't put my hands on it too much and haven't seen any issues so far.

The dashboard could be more simple and show the more important issues that are detected first. We'd like to be able to set it up so more important issues show up more prominently in the dashboard. 

I have been using this solution for six to twelve months.

The stability is very good. 

We have not tested the scalability. This is my first deployment. 

Our technicians do not often ask for support, however, the support is okay. The questions they asked were handled responsively. 

Positive

We previously used an open source solution. This is the first solution we have used for this kind of work. We are using syslog-ng with Sysdig, and I am comparing them both. 

The solution was easy to deploy and easy to use. The technicians found that it was not too difficult to use.

The initial setup was not complex. It's easy.

I handled the deployment on my own. 

The pricing is okay. I need the cheapest price. However, the pricing I've seen is okay. 

I did not evaluate any other options. I plan on testing more options next year. 

It hasn't necessarily freed up time for me. I haven't noted any time to value yet.

It's a good solution and better than the open source option I tested. I need more time to test and clarify the solution. While it is okay, I expect more from it. I'd like to have something that is out of the box. 

I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

The solution is used for runtime security of containers, cloud security, CSPM, and CWPP.

The solution's runtime security and Falco are the two features I found to be the most valuable ones. So, Falco is their open-source tool for rules and policies.

The solution needs to improve overall from a CSPM standpoint since they can't compete with Wiz or Orca.

I have an experience two years of with Sysdig Secure. Our company is a partner and reseller of Sysdig.

It's a very stable product. We should decide whether we are talking about containers or the cloud. So, if we're talking about it from a container standpoint, it is a stable product. If we're talking about it from a cloud standpoint, then essentially not a stable product.

From a container-based standpoint, it offers excellent scalability to its users, while from a cloud-based and security standpoint, it is not too great.

The technical support offered by the vendor is good. The technical support is very knowledgeable. I rate the technical support team an eight or nine out of ten.

Positive

I rate the solution's initial setup a six out of ten. So, one needs to have good and dedicated personnel or a team to ensure it is up and running.

Only one person is required if the deployment is being carried out for a small team. However, a handful of people would be required if the deployment is being carried out for an extensive team.

The deployment process typically involves various roles, including security engineers and cloud architects. These professionals may need to have visibility into the underlying STL stack to ensure a secure and efficient deployment.

The solution's pricing depends on the agents. So, on average, it's around 80K. In short, the price depends on the environment of its user.

I would tell those planning to use the solution that, from a container standpoint, it's excellent. If you're looking at it for other things, other vendors might be able to offer you better tools. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for monitoring clusters on the AWS account. We also do some proofs of concept. They have implemented a way to view the logs.

The solution has connection with cloud providers with the development abilities.

The solution could allow us to see the wireless Internet cluster and select the data inside it.

I have been using Sysdig Secure as a partner for two months.

There was an error. In the beginning, we couldn't connect with some other AWS account, we have to open a case to the support.

I rate the solution’s scalability a seven out of ten.

We have a direct contact with the support.

Positive

The initial setup is not easy. We have to connect the AWS account to Sysdig Secure.

Sysdig Secure is a good tool for understanding and monitoring the security cluster.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight-point five out of ten.