SnapLogic Reviews

My main use case for SnapLogic is automating data ingestion. I am using SnapLogic to automate data ingestion by collecting data from sources such as AWS or SAP and then enriching data and loading it into a data cloud. That is the main way I'm using SnapLogic right now.

The best features SnapLogic offers include a fantastic interface, and being able to drag and drop and connect core components with minimal configuration and coding is really helpful and streamlines the deployment process.

The drag and drop interface and streamlined deployment have helped my team day to day by allowing us to deploy new processes far quicker than we would have done historically. SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization so far, with very positive feedback. There is potential to offload debt to SnapLogic to close out very complicated historic data flows. We have definitely saved time from using SnapLogic, but we don't have specific metrics just yet as the product is still in deployment at the moment.

SnapLogic can be improved. My only initial suggestion is that the AI agent is a little overly friendly. That is the main thing for now regarding needed improvements. There is some confusion in the documentation, but the overall product seems very good, and those are the additional improvements I would like to see in SnapLogic.

I have been using SnapLogic for three months.

SnapLogic is stable.

SnapLogic has been very scalable so far, and we have deployed multiple Groundplex nodes with ease.

Customer support has been very good, as we have had multiple calls per week helping us set up the platform. The knowledge and the information provided on these calls is really valuable. I would rate the customer support on a scale of one to ten as a ten.

We did use a different solution previously, which was a proprietary developed workflow within the business, and that is why we switched.

I was not involved in the pricing, but I did take over the setup. The Groundplex installation, for example, was very easy.

We do not have relevant metrics with us just yet regarding a return on investment, such as time or money saved so far.

Before choosing SnapLogic, I evaluated other options, including Visual Cron.

My advice for others looking into using SnapLogic is to definitely spend some time exploring what SnapLogic can offer; it is a fantastic product. I would rate this review an eight out of ten.

My main use case for SnapLogic is creating pipelines for data migration projects.

A specific example of a pipeline I have built for a data migration project is when we have our old product in a different technology that we are moving to the new product. For that, we are moving the data from SQL to the Next Gen SQL database. We are creating pipelines through which we are moving the data from the old product to the new product.

As of now, we are only using SnapLogic for data migration projects.

SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization in terms of revenue and customer satisfaction.

The faster delivery is one significant point, and our customers were very happy. Earlier, we used other tools that took around a year, and because of SnapLogic, we were able to complete tasks within months, so they were very satisfied with this tool.

The best features SnapLogic offers include various Snaps we use, such as Get, Get Post, and error handling, which is a very good feature. Error handling allows us to easily identify if we have any errors in our migration pipelines.

The error handling feature has helped me during my migrations because when we moved a lot of data, we opened our error log and could easily identify all the areas that had errors, which was very helpful for us in resolving the issues.

There are many features that are truly helpful, including Union, Joins, and various Snaps, so everything is very useful based on our project, and it really helps us speed up our work.

Regarding SnapLogic's governance and security capabilities, I think they are very good compared to others; there is no doubt about security, as it is a very good tool for security.

As for SnapLogic's AI capabilities regarding accuracy and reliability of output, I can say we currently have eighty percent reliability and accuracy, which I think is good, and it would be better if we could improve more, but currently it is eighty percent from my perspective.

Although SnapLogic is already a very good tool, it can be improved by making the GUI part, particularly the user interface, more usable, which would be more helpful for users.

Apart from that, I think it is fine and good, and once we use it more, I will provide feedback on other things as well.

As of now, I do not have any other improvements for SnapLogic that come to mind, but once I think of something, I will surely update.

I have been using SnapLogic for the past one year.

SnapLogic is very stable.

SnapLogic's scalability is excellent; we can easily scale, and it is straightforward to do so.

The customer support is very good; we can easily access the support team on demand whenever we need help, and they are helpful.

I would rate the customer support ten out of ten.

I previously used a different solution, specifically the SSIS tool, which is a Microsoft tool, and now we have switched to SnapLogic.

I have seen a return on investment; although I do not have specific numbers, we saved time by completing tasks in months instead of years, which indicates that if we saved time, we obviously saved money too.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is such that as a developer, we are not aware of much of these things; we are more focused on the technical side.

Before choosing SnapLogic, we evaluated other options such as Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, and ultimately we found SnapLogic very helpful, so we opted for that one.

My advice to others looking into using SnapLogic is to switch to this tool, explore various features, and it will be helpful; it is a good tool for them to choose. I would rate SnapLogic an eight out of ten.

SnapLogic is used for system integration, similar to SSIS, and also for more complex integrations such as integrating our HR system to various partner systems, both on-premises and cloud-based.

We now have a single publisher from our HR system that is triggered and managed by SnapLogic, which delivers it out to various partner systems. This allows us to support benefits for our employees, employee tracking, and employee reporting in a secure and safe way.

SnapLogic is also used in conjunction with our event bridge for event processing, functioning almost as an adapter. It allows us to take messages off our event bridge and integrate with systems that would not naturally talk in an event-based way.

The best features SnapLogic offers are the low entry knowledge, making it very simple for somebody to pick up and work with the product. SnapLogic has great AI-based features, not only from an MCP server point of view but also internally within the tool itself, and it utilizes AI in a sensible way that really helps developers deliver quickly.

Within the mapping tool of SnapLogic, there is now an AI prompting feature which allows you to take source data and use AI to map it to the target. This allows you to do almost no-code work. For example, you could say, 'Take this date, reformat it, and if it's in this date range, do X or Y.' Another feature is pipeline creation, where you can ask from a prompt base, saying 'Deliver me a pipeline that does this,' and then refine it repeatedly to deliver a pipeline very quickly with very low manual input.

The biggest improvement observed from using SnapLogic is speed. SnapLogic allows us to deliver at a higher pace, which in this modern age really helps with the business. It has helped us manage our estate better through the use of not being responsible for the actual platform itself, but just building upon it. SnapLogic takes products such as BizTalk and Dell Boomi to another level, and I think that's one of the things that has really helped people engage and work with the product.

One thing that comes to mind about SnapLogic is that the product is always improving, which is a great thing, but the changes in the UI and the way things keep moving around mean that a level of stability would help achieve a higher adoption ratio.

The changes in the UI have frustrated a few people, which is why a nine for SnapLogic is justified. Additionally, some of the snaps could do with greater functionality. For example, the SOAP snap could be opened up to allow broader usage.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities and its governance and security, as you determine the model that it uses, this is very much on the developer or implementer to provide that level of control. SnapLogic is open to lots of models and works with any AI model out there, and that exposes a risk. This creates a risk that you could provide your own sensitive data out to a public model. Therefore, it is very much on the developer to make sure that security and the level of data retention is kept in-house.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, the accuracy and reliability of output is subject to hallucinations, just any AI model. The accuracy is no better or worse than any other platform. In some ways, it does help with the prompting and helps make a better prompt, which will give back better data, but it is no better or worse than ChatGPT.

SnapLogic has been used since Drax purchased it, which is about four to four and a half years.

SnapLogic is stable.

Within our state, there have been no problems with SnapLogic's scalability.

Customer support from SnapLogic has been brilliant. We do have an elite service contract with SnapLogic, and we always get any challenges, questions, and issues resolved very quickly. SnapLogic's customer support receives a perfect rating.

Drax has used a number of solutions before SnapLogic over the years, including BizTalk, Tibco, and Service Bus. The goal was to find one platform that is fit for the future, allowing us to do everything that we do today in a more consistent way.

Regarding return on investment with SnapLogic, I was not involved in the financial side. Definitely not fewer employees are involved; rather, people use it in a better way to deliver quicker.

Before choosing SnapLogic, we looked at most of the top right quadrant Gartner partners, including Informatica and Dell Boomi. However, SnapLogic stood out as the right choice for us.

My advice for others looking into using SnapLogic is to get your model for platform as a service support decided as soon as possible. The more you can stabilize and share the platform, the quicker you will see a return. My overall rating for SnapLogic is nine out of ten.

I connect system to system, and sometimes I do applications to applications as well. When required, I build some APIs in SnapLogic and expose them to customers.

From a general automation perspective, when a business wants to automate a particular use case, it can be anything. For example, tickets are getting created in ServiceNow where I need to automate the ticket creation with the information I receive back to Jira or something similar. I connect with systems such as ServiceNow and Jira and automatically create an automation workflow that connects these two systems to make the process automated, which saves manual effort.

I work on many use cases across different domains, such as HR, sales, and many other domains. I use SnapLogic in the regular way, as it needs to be used.

From an impact perspective, SnapLogic really helps me as a middleware level platform. It helps me to automate many integration workflows. As for improvements, the monitor that I currently use sometimes gets stuck and I am not able to expand and view the child pipelines in a much easier way. On the monitor part, I can do some fine-tuning, which would help the developer, citizen integrator, or any support person easily monitor the pipelines and easily access the pipeline logs. That would be very beneficial. There are also many other areas that I can work on where I see that these areas would be beneficial for a larger group and I can try to implement those points.

I cannot share the exact numbers or percentage, but I can say that SnapLogic has really helped my team in saving time because due to this automation, I do not need to do the manual activity. The person's effort is saved, the time is saved, and many other things are improved. Due to this automation, I see better results compared to the manual ones because the logic I have added to the automation is more specific and more static. Sometimes when I do it manually, I might end up making some small errors, but as I have built it as an automation workflow, there will not be any minor issues. This is considerably a good time-saving solution.

The best feature is that it is easy to use because it provides a UI level and drag and drop options, which are simply easy for anybody to kickstart and use much easier compared to some complicated ones.

Another valuable feature is that SnapLogic has been providing more connectors, which means more Snaps when compared to the past. This gives developers or citizen integrators the ability to connect various new systems or applications as well.

For new users who have started to explore SnapLogic, they can simply understand from the name what each Snap does. For example, file reader and file writer make it clear what the exact functionality will be. The catalog provides easy drag and drop and connect capabilities. The AI assistant helps me with some examples referring to what the next Snap I can use will be. This kind of additional feature benefits the new users who are going to use SnapLogic for the first time. This adds ease to their experience.

I use many features and I feel they are good. SnapLogic is compatible in many areas and provides better features when compared to other integration tools.

One area would be improving the monitor. Another few things I would mention is that I would like better logs to debug in case of any issues, other than just understanding from the pipeline statistics level. I would appreciate some additional logs where on a need basis, I can enable the slots and the traces will be available at the server level so that I can capture the end-to-end what is happening, such as request, response, and things. This feature would be really helpful at the time of critical P1 issues, which I can use.

As I mentioned earlier, with few corrections in the monitor and logging and few other areas that I correct and improve, SnapLogic will be much more scalable than others. This is the reason I have given this rating.

I have been using SnapLogic for around 7.5 years.

For reusable ones, I am building some pipelines where I am actually using the reusability concepts. Performance-wise, it is completely based on the server setup that I have. This is something based on the business use case or based on the business I will be thinking it and putting up the server capacity. Performance-wise, I do not see any issue.

I have been using SnapLogic from the beginning.

I would say time saved.

As of now, nothing.

I would suggest that if someone is looking for data integration, application integration, and API building in one tool, then SnapLogic is one of the options which they can give a try.

Regarding automation, there were multiple business requirements to automate processes, such as sales processes and finance data. They wanted to integrate with different systems and achieve accurate results with the reflection of accurate data into correct databases. In that way, we can use SnapLogic to integrate and load; it is ETL, extract, load, and transform with different databases. With those databases, it will be really helpful to use SnapLogic, which will serve as the middleware tool to make it easy to transform data.

For deployment, we were raising requests to another team. They were creating solutions to make it happen with the help of Postman; we were adding details, and using the Postman tool, they were integrating or deploying in another environment.

The tool is very user-friendly and not complex to understand. The structure of the platform is easy to understand, and we can build multiple systems with low-code, no-code, so it doesn't require much coding language. Now it is moving more into APIs, so we can create APIs to transfer data, which we can manage. It's moving into AI, so we can create AI agents with LLM models. We can use most of the LLM such as Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Azure AI. With those Snaps, we can integrate and move more into the AI world.

SnapLogic is hosted on Groundplex and AWS cloud. It has pre-built connectors, which we call Snaps. That is very helpful to connect with multiple systems.

We have a dashboard monitor that is very graphical. We can measure exact times in seconds and how much time it took to complete the process. With that help, it's really helpful to see how much memory consumption is utilized. The monitor structure has very good features for SnapLogic.

SnapLogic is an integration tool which we use to integrate multiple systems such as source system, target system, cloud systems, and Groundplex systems. It is an iPaaS tool and a very strong tool. Now it is moving more into APIs and AI/ML tools; it is improving their knowledge. It is helpful for creating SnapLogic agents. In this way, SnapLogic is expanding their work.

In the future, SnapLogic can make connectors with LLM connectors which are available recently. They can work on that aspect. Sometimes those connectors have low performance or don't generate accurate results, so that can be improved.

I have been working with SnapLogic for three-plus years.

Recently, I haven't found any performance issues. Previously, a year or a year and a half back, sometimes it was lagging, meaning it was giving low performance. But recently, in a year, I haven't found many performance issues in SnapLogic.

SnapLogic is scalable.

They have a community channel for support if needed. Some SMEs are allotted for the organization, so in case of any issue, we have their email IDs to contact them for support, including SMEs and community.

Neutral

There was MOVEit, which was the old product. We migrated from MOVEit to SnapLogic.

In MOVEit there were some security issues, and that product was taking a long time to respond, and the performance was very laggy. We decided to move to SnapLogic due to these security issues.

It was not straightforward. There were medium to complex kinds of integrations. Sometimes it is direct integration, and sometimes it has logics to make transformations. In some cases, we have scripts we need to run in SnapLogic to perform operations.

Regarding the transformation in SnapLogic, we can make complex query transformations, multiple logic, if-else statements, or any ternary operators; any transformation needed from source database or source system to target system. SnapLogic is really helpful to make that transformation with the help of connectors.

Previously, we were using other tools and observed their timing. When we migrated that logic to SnapLogic, we found a major difference compared to the old legacy tool. It is saving cost and time. SnapLogic is really helpful and processes in very little time, so it doesn't take much time compared to any legacy tool.

I do not know the exact pricing.

It was not straightforward. There were medium to complex kinds of integrations. Sometimes it is direct integration, and sometimes it has logics to make transformations. In some cases, we have scripts we need to run in SnapLogic to perform operations.

I would consider SnapLogic, and I would suggest any other organization use SnapLogic because it's not just an ETL tool; it is also moving into data orchestration and AI. It is a very scalable product and highly recommended. I rate SnapLogic 8 out of 10.

I have been using SnapLogic for one and a half years on various multiple projects from the perspective of data migration and ingestions.

My main use case for SnapLogic is migrating some legacy product data to our newest products.

A specific example of a migration project I handled with SnapLogic involved our legacy product, which has multiple modules within it.

Regarding my main use case and other ways I use SnapLogic, we import the data as part of the ingestion process. We edit the data into an Excel tool in an Excel sheet and, using SnapLogic, read the data from the Excel sheet and load it into our newest product.

The best features SnapLogic offers in my experience include excellent REST APIs and batch processing, which is a standout feature.

Batch processing has helped us load around five to six lakh records within two to three hours, which involves loading thousands of records in a single shot. This helped our process reduce from eight hours to a couple of hours.

SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization because the professional services team has been running the pipelines and migrations very easily without any technical knowledge or dependency on technicalities.

This has made my team more efficient and freed up time for other projects. It significantly reduced the migration timeline for multiple customers, as there is no dependency on developers to run the migrations, allowing us to move to other particular migrations from the development perspective instead of running the same pipeline and staying on the same product.

API integrations are also really good to handle from a front-end perspective or any interface perspective regarding the features.

Regarding how SnapLogic can be improved, I think the Snaplex page can be improved without any downtime. There are some updates with SnapLogic that are not very stable before the release. This can be improved so that there will be no downtime impact for us.

I have been using SnapLogic for one and a half years on various multiple projects from the perspective of data migration and ingestions.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, the accuracy and reliability of output are 50-50, but there is a lot of scope for improvement because I cannot rely on SnapLogic or SnapLogic AI or SnapGPT for the development which I am currently handling.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, I think the governance and security are fine, but there is some scope for improvement with respect to security and access to personal level data.

The advice I would give to others looking into using SnapLogic is that it is a low-code tool and can be helpful for people who are just getting into software engineering or data engineering. This should help developers gain much confidence before starting with coding.

I am not really sure about the details of a business relationship with SnapLogic other than being a customer, but I am sure that we are a customer of SnapLogic. I do not know what kind of business relationship exists.

I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

My main use case for SnapLogic is for data migrations, where I am building pipelines. A specific example of a data migration project I handled with SnapLogic is moving our legacy product, EHSS Pria, to the new one by building pipelines with the base being the SQL database.

The best feature SnapLogic offers in my experience is logging, which is a great help in my projects. The logging feature is helpful because I can easily identify errors in our pipelines.

SnapLogic has impacted our organization positively as it is a great help for us. I am easily able to migrate the complete project without many difficulties. I saved time as a specific outcome, and it is easy to do.

I do not have much idea on how SnapLogic can be improved, but UI-wise, if the user interface is improved to be more user-friendly, it would be more helpful.

I have been using SnapLogic for the past one year.

SnapLogic is very good and stable.

SnapLogic's scalability is good and scalable.

Customer support is nice, and I do not have any concerns from that side. I would rate the customer support a 10 out of 10.

Earlier, I was using SSIS packages, but I switched to SnapLogic because it was not that much secure and governance-wise, it was not that good. I moved to SnapLogic due to its security features.

While I do not have specific metrics, my organization definitely got the benefits because I was able to deliver the project, and they received a good amount from the customers as I completed a few projects through SnapLogic.

I did evaluate a few other options, such as Azure Data Factory, but at last, I chose SnapLogic.

My advice to others looking into using SnapLogic is to use it because it is very good for their company, especially security-wise, as customers focus more on security features. It has very nice security features, so compared to the other tools, it is a good choice if they choose SnapLogic.

SnapLogic is a very good tool; usability-wise, it is excellent as well. Learning-wise, I can easily learn it, and if someone has worked on any other data migration tools, for them, it is very easy to learn SnapLogic. It is really helpful for their organization and learning purpose, and it is a demanding tool, which is very good for their future professionalism.

Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security features are very good. The accuracy and reliability of output is around 80%. I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

My main use case for SnapLogic is performing data migration. A specific example of a data migration project I've done with SnapLogic involves dealing with the EHR system, where we are using SnapLogic to migrate our environments, and we have the migration projects as well. Along with SSIS, we are working with SnapLogic, and we basically deal with health and safety.

I feel amazed to provide feedback on this particular tool for our main use case of data migration, as compared to any other SSIS or migration tools. The drag-and-drop feature that SnapLogic provides and the recently introduced SnapGPT are really helping us in our daily needs, and that is an amazing thing.

In my experience, the best features SnapLogic offers include its logic capability and an abundance of connectors with no limitation on input connectors, and I mainly want to highlight SnapGPT. Regarding the features of SnapLogic, I feel it is up-to-date in the market and has everything at this point in time.

SnapLogic has positively impacted our organization by enabling us to reach our delivery within our timeline. Moreover, it is easy to train any new interns or newcomers who are transitioning from other technologies, as they typically work in different cloud domains. It is easy to adapt.

The impact on timelines and training is noticeable, as both new joiners training and the knowledge transfer transformation to other teams are easy to adapt, which I want to highlight. Secondly, the drag-and-drop method and support for numerous features mean we do not need to do major manipulations for this kind of activity, which positively affects the delivery timeline.

Regarding improvements for SnapLogic, I feel the new GUI should be more readable for my team, as we find ourselves needing to zoom in and zoom out when there are too many things on the screen. I personally believe that if they enhance the GUI effect, it would be easier and handier for users. The GUI part is the only improvement I feel is necessary for SnapLogic; other than that, I find it awesome.

I have been using SnapLogic for close to four years.

When it comes to handling large volumes of data or high-throughput workloads, I have mixed opinions. We are sometimes able to manage huge amounts of data, but at other times, the pipeline execution feels a bit slow with large volumes.

SnapLogic's integration capabilities with other tools or platforms are quite good as compared to other migration tools, where scripting is often necessary for handling use cases. SnapLogic provides many features without enforcing that we write or script on one particular page.

SnapLogic's flexibility in handling different data formats or sources is excellent. I find SnapLogic's monitoring and alerting features very helpful for our team, as we rely on them completely when working with production data to find any error messages or to obtain any statistical information.

Maintaining and updating pipelines in SnapLogic is easy compared to any other tool, from my personal perspective. SnapLogic's error management and troubleshooting capabilities are helpful for my team, as the ability to read the error log itself aids us. When we validate or execute pipelines, the error message pinpointing the exact issue rather than generalizing is really supportive.

My team reported that with their experience on other tools, onboarding new users is not taking too long; it generally takes about one to two weeks to integrate them into production projects. I rate this review an eight out of ten.

My main use case for SnapLogic is importing data to my CRM. I use SnapLogic by taking data from the JustGiving platform through an import file dropped into a specific location and loading it into my CRM.

The best features SnapLogic offers include its low-code nature, which makes it relatively easy for developers to pick up, and it has a wide range of connectors.

Reusability has been important for us with SnapLogic as well as being able to build MinePlexes and reuse them. We are also getting to grips with some of the AI capability.

SnapLogic has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to remove a big risk and cost in removing a legacy integration platform, and we have built the foundations to gain significant efficiencies in our integrations.

We want to get to grips with some of the automated testing functionality in SnapLogic, but we have not had the time to do that yet.

The main frustrations for us with SnapLogic have not been the technology, but the usual things of stakeholder capacity constraints and other hold-ups to the project.

One improvement that would be beneficial is better visibility of SnapLogic's environmental credentials.

I have been using SnapLogic for 18 months.

SnapLogic has been reliable for me with no downtime or disruptions.

SnapLogic's scalability as our needs grow or change is good.

The customer support for SnapLogic is very good.

I do not have any specific outcomes or metrics to share regarding time or money saved or how my team's workload has changed.

Learning SnapLogic for my team was fairly easy.

My experience with SnapLogic's documentation and learning resources is pretty good, although it always feels as though there is more to learn.

SnapLogic's integration with my existing systems and tools is easy and good.

SnapLogic's performance and speed when handling large data volumes are good. We have hit some snags, but we believe that is more on our CRM side than SnapLogic.

My advice to others looking into using SnapLogic is to go for it. I would rate this review as a 9.

For data migrations, we are building pipelines with SnapLogic. We have our legacy product, EHSS Pria, and from there we move to the new one by building pipelines with the base being the SQL database, which we handle with SnapLogic. I have provided details about my main use case and ways I am using SnapLogic.

Logging is the best feature I found with SnapLogic, and it is a great help in my projects.

We can easily identify the errors in our pipelines with SnapLogic's logging feature, making it very helpful for my projects.

SnapLogic is a great help for our organization, and with it, we are easily able to migrate the complete project without much difficulty.

We saved time with SnapLogic, and it is easy to use.

I do not have much idea on how SnapLogic can be improved, but from a user interface perspective, if it were improved in a more user-friendly way, it would be more helpful.

I do not have any suggestions other than that regarding SnapLogic.

In the past one year.

SnapLogic is very stable.

SnapLogic is scalable.

Customer support with SnapLogic is nice, and we do not have any concerns from that side.

I would rate the customer support of SnapLogic ten out of ten.

Earlier we were using SSIS packages, but that was not as good from a security and governance perspective, so we moved to SnapLogic due to its security features.

We do not have specific ROI metrics, but as we were able to deliver our project through SnapLogic, our organization certainly got the benefits and received a good amount from customers as we completed several projects.

We did a few evaluations including Azure Data Factory, but ultimately we chose SnapLogic.

I advise others to use SnapLogic as it is very good for their company. Security-wise, customers focus more on security features these days, and SnapLogic has very nice security features, making it a better choice compared to other tools.

SnapLogic is a very good tool, and from a usability perspective, it is excellent. Learning-wise, we can easily learn it. If someone has worked on any other data migration tools, learning SnapLogic is very easy, and it is truly helpful for their organization and learning purposes. SnapLogic is a demanding tool, which is good for future professionalism.

I would rate this product nine out of ten.