Seemplicity Reviews

For us, the main use case for Seemplicity is to get vulnerability findings in order to remediate the issue, and then some of our teams need to automatically check the vulnerability based on our automation setting.

Whenever we find or identify new findings in Seemplicity, we set up the vulnerability rule on our end, which identifies what the previous rule setting was, and the auto-fix is based on what we configured and what we want to mitigate, using this automation setting for these vulnerabilities.

The best features that Seemplicity offers include the risk finding, rule setting, and the analytics in the dashboard, where we can identify all types of vulnerabilities.

Out of those features, I find myself using the analytics in the dashboard most often because in some cases, I need to investigate the findings, while the second one is the rule setting based on the team request.

Seemplicity has a huge positive impact on our organization because once we have a vulnerability, it acts as a great assistant with its auto-mitigate feature, which can be used for a variety of different types of vulnerabilities, supporting our cybersecurity analysis.

The positive outcomes from using Seemplicity include saving our human effort, and while I cannot calculate the exact hours, it usually saves over five hours per employee, and our security posture is always up-to-date with the standard framework based on all of the vulnerability findings.

Seemplicity can be improved because sometimes the rule setting can be a little complicated, and for instance, filtering out the criteria may not be useful at times, as it can be too complicated based on the business requirements.

If we can have more metrics in Seemplicity dashboard, it could be very useful and helpful for us, as some parts of the dashboard just look to require a template, suggesting that more widgets would greatly enhance it.

I have been using Seemplicity for less than one year.

Seemplicity is stable.

Its scalability is great because once we set up new teams, their risk and vulnerability finding process is very scalable.

Customer support for Seemplicity is great because whenever I open a ticket and chat with support, the admin responds right away.

Seemplicity contributes significantly to our organization's readiness for regulatory audits because most of our InfoSec team uses it when investigating vulnerabilities.

I would rate Seemplicity an eight out of ten. I choose eight out of ten because overall, Seemplicity is a great tool, but it sometimes has a sync issue between other applications and itself, such as Twist or some other inventory data or sources of data, indicating a need for improved functionality for synchronizing data.

While I do not quite use Seemplicity's AI capabilities a lot, I was recently informed about them and have utilized the AI for problem-solving by chatting with it to get an immediate solution or instant message, which proves to be useful.

I cannot measure the accuracy of Seemplicity's AI, but I think its reliability is around eighty percent, as I feel a bit doubtful about the accuracy since my usage has mainly been through the chat feature.

My advice for others looking into using Seemplicity is that it would be beneficial since you can clearly see the vulnerability findings. My review rating for Seemplicity is eight out of ten.

My main use case for Seemplicity is unified vulnerability management. I use Seemplicity for unified vulnerability management by aggregating the detections from various sources which we use for performing the scans, and this provides a view for our stakeholders and for the mitigation team as well to cut the tickets and work on the process.

The interesting challenge that is solved with Seemplicity is aggregating the detections and then showcasing it according to our requirement based on our prioritization framework.

The best features Seemplicity offers include the aggregation logic, the way it is simplified to view and access, and the ability to have a view in a simpler way.

The aggregation logic in Seemplicity stands out for me because it made the features simpler for the team and the aggregation logic and other features are something useful for us in speeding up the things for the mitigation activities.

Seemplicity has positively impacted our organization, as we are still in the phase of production for all the zones, so we don't have feedback yet, but for now, it's all good.

To improve Seemplicity, I would suggest having more knowledge base and more threat intel. Adding the threat intel features will improve much, such as having its own threat intel source which is covered from the third-party sources and then converted, that will help.

I have been using Seemplicity for more than a year now.

Seemplicity is stable.

Seemplicity's scalability is good.

The customer support for Seemplicity is amazing.

We did not previously use a different solution.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that earlier we felt it was too pricey, but I think it's worth it.

We use AWS, Azure, and GCP, and right now we have Seemplicity on a private cloud.

I have seen a return on investment with Seemplicity, as we are saving money, so it's worth it.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that earlier we felt it was too pricey, but I think it's worth it.

Before choosing Seemplicity, we evaluated other options, including Nucleus and Armis.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is that it is highly recommended. Regarding Seemplicity's AI capabilities in terms of governance and security, I think it's all good. Regarding Seemplicity's AI capabilities, I think its accuracy and reliability of output are good for now.

Private Cloud

Other

The main use case for Seemplicity is automating vulnerability tickets creation by using predefined asset scopes. I use Seemplicity's remediation queues to automatically feed vulnerability tickets into our remediation owners native Jira projects, ensuring that the entire process end to end is automated. The automation allows us to maintain control over ticket volume while ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.

The best features Seemplicity offers from our perspective include the ticketing queue automation, which allows us to create unique ticketing queues specific to each remediating team, and the various customizability around severity assignment, and rules that help us alter the priority or severity level as appropriate to our business.

Ticketing queue automation in Seemplicity has freed time and resources for my team because it reduces the time we spend on manually cutting tickets. Instead we can focus on tuning the automation, scopes and queues which scales with time. 

More customizations around the scoping, filters, dashboarding/metrics would be great.

I have been working in my current field for about eight years.

Seemplicity is stable.

For our use, the scalability is good because it is very easy to setup new scopes and remediations queues. 

Customer support for Seemplicity is quick to respond and provide feedback to any issues or feature requests that we have requested.

We previously had Daz, which was acquired by Wiz, and we switched because the vulnerability management capabilities inside of Wiz were not satisfactory at the time of purchase.

I do not have any specific metrics to share regarding return on investment, but Seemplicity has saved us time and overhead.

We found the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Seemplicity to be extremely fair.

We evaluated a couple of other options before choosing Seemplicity, including Nucleus and Armis.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is to make sure that you have your primary use cases documented and measure the success of the proof of concept against your requirements.

Public Cloud

Other

My main use case for Seemplicity is providing vulnerability data to customers via tools like Qualys. Seemplicity helps us run vulnerability data to customers by allowing us to filter all of the data from Qualys directly into the customer's ITSM platforms, enabling them to manage their remediations.

Seemplicity has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to provide a single viewpoint into vulnerability management and pen testing for our customers. That single viewpoint has changed things for our customers and team by allowing for better updates in terms of vulnerabilities and pen test results, enabling them to better organize how they resolve those challenges and issues.

Seemplicity has contributed to our organization's readiness for regulatory audits by being beneficial for our customers.

The best features Seemplicity offers are phenomenal aggregation that reduces the total count of vulnerabilities down by a huge amount, and SEMA, the AI, is very good as well. When it comes to aggregation reducing the total count of vulnerabilities, SEMA stands out to me for its ability to troubleshoot issues directly within the platform while allowing the AI to also query things internally, providing good and accurate responses without having to use guides or third-party solutions. Depending on how it's set up with the customer and their goals, you can reduce total counts from hundreds into under ten tickets that need to be raised very quickly.

Seemplicity has a great library of integrations. Seemplicity's AI capabilities tick all the boxes of what we need it to do in terms of governance and security. In terms of accuracy and reliability of output, I have mainly used Seemplicity for troubleshooting and querying if things are possible within the platform, and it has given good outputs that have worked, so I have no issues with it.

If I had to think of one thing that could be even better, it would be auto-remediation for vulnerabilities, specifically the ability to link into solutions that can handle the auto-remediation, translating Qualys's information to another tool that can then do the auto-remediation. The support is great, and I do not see any main reasons or main things for improvement off the top of my head.

I have been using Seemplicity for two and a half years.

Seemplicity is stable.

I have not seen any issues with the scalability of Seemplicity.

The customer support has been phenomenal, with Alon getting responses as quickly as possible, solving issues, and getting on calls if we need them for priority issues. I rate the customer support a nine on a scale of one to ten.

We did not previously use a different solution that handled what Seemplicity does.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing and setup costs were not in my area. The setup itself was reasonably smooth. Licensing is also not my area, as I am more of the technical, hands-on person.

Seemplicity is deployed in my organization via Seemplicity themselves, and we manage the platform configuration. I am not sure if it is public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, or on-premises.

I have not seen a return on investment since financial figures are not my area. I am a technical person.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing and setup costs were not in my area. The setup itself was reasonably smooth. Licensing is also not my area, as I am more of the technical, hands-on person.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Seemplicity. That was not in my area, as I was just given the tool to utilize.

My advice to others looking into using Seemplicity is to be aware that you will get more information from support than from the documents themselves, and it can take a bit of time after feeding in data to show meaningful results. However, it does show meaningful results in the end. I rate Seemplicity a seven on a scale of one to ten.

Seemplicity is deployed in my organization via Seemplicity themselves, and we manage the platform configuration. I am not sure if it is public cloud, private cloud, hybrid cloud, or on-premises.

Other