Oracle WebLogic Server Reviews

We use this solution with an insurance portal.

Oracle WebLogic Server is secure.

Licensing fees need improvement.

I have been supporting Oracle WebLogic Server for ten years.

Oracle WebLogic Server is a stable product.

We have no issues with the scalability of the Oracle WebLogic Server. 

In our organization, we have 3,000 to 4,000 customers.

Technical support is fine. I don't have any issues with the support.

Depending on the severity of the issue will determine the length of time it takes to get a response.

If it is a severe case, they will respond immediately. They will prioritize the support depending on the severity.

The installation is straightforward. It's easy.

The complete setup takes a week.

We have a team of five to ten people who maintain this solution.

I completed the installation and setup myself.

Fees are paid on a yearly basis.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.

We are using Oracle WebCenter content to store our enterprise documentation. We want to create a database warehouse to hold all the document information and to allow someone access to any of the documents. This will be a single gateway where someone can check-in and check-out the documents.

When we installed Oracle's complete suite it comes with multiple tools and we did not need to separately install WebLogic because all these solutions run under WebLogic itself. Once we install it, we have an administration console to enhance it. There are a couple of other related Oracle products that it can integrate with it. For example, if you want to include Oracle WebCenter Capture (WCC) or Form Recognition (WCFR), these are different modules. We have only done a couple of integrators and that has been for WCC and WCFR.

If you want to use Oracle products to the fullest with enhanced customizations, you need to get trained. There is enough documentation and the flexibility to configure the application to your needs but you will need to spend more time gathering the knowledge.

I have been using Oracle WebLogic Server for approximately one year.

The stability of the WebLogic Server is good. If you are dealing with multiple versions, you may need to work on some patch activities, but other than that it is good.

The scalability is very good.

The technical support is responsive. They are always ready to help by various communication channels, such as Zoom calls. However, sometimes it will take a while because when we are dealing with a problem, they need to look at the logs and configuration. A lot of the issues are related to the configuration that they need to look at thoroughly before they can give us a solution and it can take a few days depending on the type of problem. 

The solution was part of an Oracle suite and was installed with it which was easier than installing it seperately.

Those wanting to implement this solution will need to check what their desired functionality specific to the implementation is and if it in fact the solution can satisfy the purpose. For example, if the solution can operate without customization, and if so, you can relax and do the implementation easily. However, if your implementation requires a lot of customization changes, such as changing the behavior or the skin, it will not be straightforward. You will need to spend a lot of time getting the knowledge to do the customizations.

I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a six out of ten.

Primarily we deploy WebLogic both as an in-house and a private cloud-hosted server solution for our customers. We have got a couple of different use cases as per specific clients. Our personal use case is just to understand its functionality deploy it to adapt to client needs.  

The most valued feature is probably simply just the overall functionality. The product has a lot of versatility as far as what we can do with it and that flexibility is valuable in our ability to leverage deployments.  

We have some pain points with the product. First of all, we know that the Oracle-related WebLogic updates tend to be a little volatile. That is in regards to their regular updates. They do quarterly security patch updates.  

People do the updates and over a period and for some of them the updates lead to the product becoming unstable. The updates do not always apply correctly. If there is something that is a little bit off — say, if a customer has installed an extra piece of software or something to modify the system — this can create issues. There are a lot of reasons that can cause WebLogic updates to end up making the whole system unstable.  

Having to do with that update issue, we would like to see Oracle add the Diagnostic Pack back in. They used to have it included with the product and it was removed. There is another piece that was also useful in helping with product analysis and stability that they took out after 10g. Right now these helpful modules are just add-ons. Really they should be part of the standard package.  

We have got a couple of other smaller problems, but right now our main problem is the Oracle CPU updates. They are timely, but primal as far as installations.  

We have been working with Oracle WebLogic Server for a little over five years.  

Besides some issues with updates, the product has been pretty stable for us. The instability that we sometimes experience is not necessarily the fault of the product itself and likely is linked to modifications. I can not downgrade the stability of WebLogic based on trying to make the product do something that it was not exactly designed for.  

The scalability of the solution seems to be fine. We use the standard edition; we do not use the enterprise level, so I do not have direct experience with the enterprise version. We have been talking to Oracle about changing that and possibly upgrading. They are currently setting up a proof of concept for us, but we have not completed that evaluation yet. The enterprise package would hopefully provide even better opportunities to scale.  

We are pretty good at doing our own technical support and supplying it for our clients. The biggest problem right now is versioning. As they update versions we have had to buy extended support to cover potential issues with older versions.  

Oracle has quarterly updates, but the licensing fees are annual. In our case, the licensing runs into the thousands as an annual cost. But the pricing depends on the model that you have adopted.  

As we go through our contracts and bring on new clients, it is just a part of our normal due diligence to review new products and compare what is available on the market to make sure that we are using the best technology. "The best" is not necessarily the most current, and it is better to describe it as "the best" because newer is not always better. Mature options can evolve and sometimes that result is better than using an otherwise immature solution just because it is new. We just look at options and fit them to use cases.  

My advice to people considering WebLogic as a solution is to do the same thing that we do right now and what we make sure our clients do. Doing due diligence is not really an option. You have to make sure that a solution — any solution you are considering — matches up with the use cases you are planning to deploy it for. There is no point in investing in the wrong solution.  

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server as a seven or eight. If I had to choose between those, I would say seven. It could easily be better and that really detracts from the user and administrative experience.  

In my current company, we are working with banking systems, developing software for investment companies and finance. Our product is built on the Oracle database and Oracle WebLogic Server.

Oracle WebLogic Server is more secure and has full functionalities that can be used for big applications.

The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved.

I have been using Oracle WebLogic Server for six years.

Oracle WebLogic Server is a very stable solution.

I rate Oracle WebLogic Server an eight out of ten for stability.

I rate Oracle WebLogic Server ten out of ten for scalability.

Oracle WebLogic Server provides very good technical support.

The solution's initial setup is very easy and straightforward.

The solution's deployment does not take more than five minutes.

Only one administrator is needed for the solution's installation, deployment, and maintenance.

I would recommend Oracle WebLogic Server to other users.

Overall, I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.

We use WebLogic for app development. I think about 20 to 25 people at my company use this solution.

WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development.

I work in IT, so I'm not directly involved in programming or development. I'm not sure how to improve the tools.

I've been using WebLogic for the last two years.

The latest version is pretty reliable.

Our business is not that big, but WebLogic has worked for what we have right now, and it will meet our immediate future requirements.

Our company moved to Oracle some time ago for the Database. I believe we switched because of reliability and performance.

The Initial setup was straightforward, but there are some specific tools we use, and that took some time.

We used a consultant.

We have a yearly subscription, but I don't know how much it costs. 

Oracle WebLogic Server is used for developing, and running applications.

The integration could be improved. We need technology to be able to integrate.

I'd like to see it more cloud, defined, and easier to maintain in the next release.

I have been working with Oracle WebLogic Server for the last four years.

We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well.

From an ability perspective, I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Oracle WebLogic Server on our e-commerce webpage to manage and monitor it.

I mostly like the stability. It's a very stable solution.

It is also scalable and has a user-friendly UI.

The administration is hard, and it is more complex to use than others.

It could be more user friendly and easier to manage.

Also, starting off the applications in Oracle WebLogic Server takes a long time.

I have one and a half years of experience with this solution.

It is a very stable solution.

It's easier to scale up or scale down. The UI is user friendly.

My advice is that you should test the performance after the installation. You may struggle while starting the application. 

You can analyze deeply how to manage Oracle WebLogic Server and how to set up the configurations. It's a little complex.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at six.

We are using it for our core banking application server.

It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers.

Its pricing should be better. We are analyzing other options, such as JBoss, because of the cost of WebLogic.

I have been using this solution for 10 to 15 years.

It is very stable.

It is very scalable. We have approximately 4,000 users.

Their technical support is good. There are no issues.

It is straightforward and easy. It takes a day to deploy it.

It is expensive.

I would recommend this solution if you can afford it. Its biggest disadvantage is pricing.

I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.

We are a software solution provider and I am a Java software developer. When I deploy my work, I use an application server like Oracle WebLogic. 

We have not deployed this product for our own use, but rather for a client. It is being used as a SOAP solution for a backend service for a BASE24-eps ACI product. 

The most valuable feature is the performance.

It has good integration with security features, including OWASP.

We have had some problems with cluster solutions when working with a WebLogic domain. It may be because the error codes and error information is poor.

In the future, I would like to see better support for the REST interface.

I have been working with Oracle WebLogic for about three years.

We're having trouble with the stability of this solution.

In our country, we have had trouble with scalability because the DPS is lower.

Our client is a large company, but the market as a whole is small.

The Oracle team is not a good provider when it comes to supporting. They do not have good knowledge of the technical aspects, so Google is better.

The documentation is really good. The community is also good, although the documentation is better.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is not complex.

The deployment takes approximately two weeks at the client's site, on-premises. The total time it takes for implementation is perhaps three months.

In our country, this is an expensive product.

My client is moving from Oracle to a Red Hat solution. The main driver is that it is open-source.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use it for the deployment of the enterprise's internal applications. 

It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks.

The possibility of having several servers running, so we do not lose the service.

The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files.